冠状动脉搭桥术中导管的选择

Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, Vasileios Leivaditis, Assaf Sawafta, Anastasia Katinioti, Konstantinos Tasios, Vasiliki Garantzioti, Korina-Thomais Stathi, Andreas Antzoulas, Christos Pitros, Charalampos Kaplanis, Georgios-Ioannis Verras, Francesk Mulita
{"title":"冠状动脉搭桥术中导管的选择","authors":"Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, Vasileios Leivaditis, Assaf Sawafta, Anastasia Katinioti, Konstantinos Tasios, Vasiliki Garantzioti, Korina-Thomais Stathi, Andreas Antzoulas, Christos Pitros, Charalampos Kaplanis, Georgios-Ioannis Verras, Francesk Mulita","doi":"10.5114/amsad/170215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Choosing appropriate bypass conduits is important in the consideration of long-term outcomes after surgical revascularization. When deciding on a grafting strategy, attention should be given to technical, anatomic, and angiographic determinants of conduit properties, as well as the clinical characteristics of the patient. The aim of the study was to present a current review of available choices of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. To date, only 4 conduits have proven to be effective: the saphenous vein (SVG), the internal mammary arteries (IMAs), the radial artery (RA), and the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). The IMA has unique biological properties that confer protection to intimal growth and atherosclerotic plaque formation, making it the conduit of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting. SVG exhibits a lower patency rate than those of IMAs. The RGEA allows revascularization of the inferior wall but is less commonly used, given that it is more prone to spasms.","PeriodicalId":8317,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, Vasileios Leivaditis, Assaf Sawafta, Anastasia Katinioti, Konstantinos Tasios, Vasiliki Garantzioti, Korina-Thomais Stathi, Andreas Antzoulas, Christos Pitros, Charalampos Kaplanis, Georgios-Ioannis Verras, Francesk Mulita\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsad/170215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Choosing appropriate bypass conduits is important in the consideration of long-term outcomes after surgical revascularization. When deciding on a grafting strategy, attention should be given to technical, anatomic, and angiographic determinants of conduit properties, as well as the clinical characteristics of the patient. The aim of the study was to present a current review of available choices of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. To date, only 4 conduits have proven to be effective: the saphenous vein (SVG), the internal mammary arteries (IMAs), the radial artery (RA), and the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). The IMA has unique biological properties that confer protection to intimal growth and atherosclerotic plaque formation, making it the conduit of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting. SVG exhibits a lower patency rate than those of IMAs. The RGEA allows revascularization of the inferior wall but is less commonly used, given that it is more prone to spasms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad/170215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad/170215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择合适的旁路导管是考虑手术血运重建术后长期预后的重要因素。在决定移植策略时,应注意导管特性的技术、解剖和血管造影决定因素,以及患者的临床特征。本研究的目的是对目前冠状动脉搭桥手术中可用导管的选择进行综述。迄今为止,只有4条导管被证明是有效的:隐静脉(SVG)、乳腺内动脉(ima)、桡动脉(RA)和右胃网膜动脉(RGEA)。IMA具有独特的生物学特性,可保护内膜生长和动脉粥样硬化斑块的形成,使其成为冠状动脉旁路移植术的首选导管。SVG的通畅率低于ima。RGEA允许下壁血运重建,但不常用,因为它更容易发生痉挛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery
Choosing appropriate bypass conduits is important in the consideration of long-term outcomes after surgical revascularization. When deciding on a grafting strategy, attention should be given to technical, anatomic, and angiographic determinants of conduit properties, as well as the clinical characteristics of the patient. The aim of the study was to present a current review of available choices of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. To date, only 4 conduits have proven to be effective: the saphenous vein (SVG), the internal mammary arteries (IMAs), the radial artery (RA), and the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). The IMA has unique biological properties that confer protection to intimal growth and atherosclerotic plaque formation, making it the conduit of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting. SVG exhibits a lower patency rate than those of IMAs. The RGEA allows revascularization of the inferior wall but is less commonly used, given that it is more prone to spasms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信