心理(智力)测验的反应过程及其效度

Vanessa Torres van Grinsven
{"title":"心理(智力)测验的反应过程及其效度","authors":"Vanessa Torres van Grinsven","doi":"10.19080/gjidd.2023.11.555825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standardized (psychometric) tests are common tools used in the diagnosis of learning and behavior disabilities in children. In this essay, I argue that, in a test-taking situation with a psychometric test, complex interrelationships take place. This complex interaction shapes the response process which results in a performance, i.e., the results of this test. Current psychometric practices and test-taking practices and interpretation of results fail to take this response process sufficiently into account. I present the interactionist and process-performance approach as a framework to help address this phenomenon, discuss a few examples of subtests of WISC IV based on this approach, and call for more research into the response process and aspects of tests that may impact validity.","PeriodicalId":93559,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of intellectual & developmental disabilities","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Response Process in Psychometric (Intelligence) Testing and Validity\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Torres van Grinsven\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/gjidd.2023.11.555825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standardized (psychometric) tests are common tools used in the diagnosis of learning and behavior disabilities in children. In this essay, I argue that, in a test-taking situation with a psychometric test, complex interrelationships take place. This complex interaction shapes the response process which results in a performance, i.e., the results of this test. Current psychometric practices and test-taking practices and interpretation of results fail to take this response process sufficiently into account. I present the interactionist and process-performance approach as a framework to help address this phenomenon, discuss a few examples of subtests of WISC IV based on this approach, and call for more research into the response process and aspects of tests that may impact validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal of intellectual & developmental disabilities\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal of intellectual & developmental disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/gjidd.2023.11.555825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of intellectual & developmental disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/gjidd.2023.11.555825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准化(心理测量)测试是诊断儿童学习和行为障碍的常用工具。在这篇文章中,我认为,在心理测试的测试情况下,复杂的相互关系发生了。这种复杂的相互作用形成了导致表现的反应过程,即测试的结果。目前的心理测量学实践和考试实践以及对结果的解释未能充分考虑到这一反应过程。我提出了交互和过程性能方法作为帮助解决这一现象的框架,讨论了基于该方法的WISC IV子测试的几个例子,并呼吁对响应过程和可能影响效度的测试方面进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Response Process in Psychometric (Intelligence) Testing and Validity
Standardized (psychometric) tests are common tools used in the diagnosis of learning and behavior disabilities in children. In this essay, I argue that, in a test-taking situation with a psychometric test, complex interrelationships take place. This complex interaction shapes the response process which results in a performance, i.e., the results of this test. Current psychometric practices and test-taking practices and interpretation of results fail to take this response process sufficiently into account. I present the interactionist and process-performance approach as a framework to help address this phenomenon, discuss a few examples of subtests of WISC IV based on this approach, and call for more research into the response process and aspects of tests that may impact validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信