{"title":"喷砂清理钢基体的测量方法和分形维数","authors":"T. Marquardt, A. W. Momber, A. Krenz","doi":"10.1080/02670844.2023.2259527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMorphological parameters of steel substrates determine the adhesion of coatings and adhesives. Three different assessment methods (cross section image, contact stylus instrument, and stripe light projection) were applied to blast-cleaned substrates. A total of 12 surface configurations were generated with different abrasive materials. The fractal dimensions were estimated by means of the box-counting method. Design of experiment and ANOVA were applied to statistically analyze the relationships. Factors included abrasive type, surface preparation grade, surface roughness, and surface profile measurement method. Similar relative trends for the fractal dimensions resulted for the three measurement methods. The normalized values of the fractal dimensions were approximately twice as high for the cross section profiles compared to the ones from contact stylus and stripe light projection. Fractal values derived from contact stylus measurements showed the highest repeatability, whereas those derived from cross section images showed the lowest repeatability.KEYWORDS: Cross sectionfractal dimensionprofile impactstripe line projectionstylus instrument Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis study received financial support from the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) in Berlin, Germany, through the ‘FoKO-Wind’ project [grant number: 03EE2006A] as part of the ‘7. Energieforschungsprogramm’.","PeriodicalId":21995,"journal":{"name":"Surface Engineering","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement methods and fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel substrates\",\"authors\":\"T. Marquardt, A. W. Momber, A. Krenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02670844.2023.2259527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTMorphological parameters of steel substrates determine the adhesion of coatings and adhesives. Three different assessment methods (cross section image, contact stylus instrument, and stripe light projection) were applied to blast-cleaned substrates. A total of 12 surface configurations were generated with different abrasive materials. The fractal dimensions were estimated by means of the box-counting method. Design of experiment and ANOVA were applied to statistically analyze the relationships. Factors included abrasive type, surface preparation grade, surface roughness, and surface profile measurement method. Similar relative trends for the fractal dimensions resulted for the three measurement methods. The normalized values of the fractal dimensions were approximately twice as high for the cross section profiles compared to the ones from contact stylus and stripe light projection. Fractal values derived from contact stylus measurements showed the highest repeatability, whereas those derived from cross section images showed the lowest repeatability.KEYWORDS: Cross sectionfractal dimensionprofile impactstripe line projectionstylus instrument Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis study received financial support from the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) in Berlin, Germany, through the ‘FoKO-Wind’ project [grant number: 03EE2006A] as part of the ‘7. Energieforschungsprogramm’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface Engineering\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2023.2259527\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2023.2259527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement methods and fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel substrates
ABSTRACTMorphological parameters of steel substrates determine the adhesion of coatings and adhesives. Three different assessment methods (cross section image, contact stylus instrument, and stripe light projection) were applied to blast-cleaned substrates. A total of 12 surface configurations were generated with different abrasive materials. The fractal dimensions were estimated by means of the box-counting method. Design of experiment and ANOVA were applied to statistically analyze the relationships. Factors included abrasive type, surface preparation grade, surface roughness, and surface profile measurement method. Similar relative trends for the fractal dimensions resulted for the three measurement methods. The normalized values of the fractal dimensions were approximately twice as high for the cross section profiles compared to the ones from contact stylus and stripe light projection. Fractal values derived from contact stylus measurements showed the highest repeatability, whereas those derived from cross section images showed the lowest repeatability.KEYWORDS: Cross sectionfractal dimensionprofile impactstripe line projectionstylus instrument Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis study received financial support from the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) in Berlin, Germany, through the ‘FoKO-Wind’ project [grant number: 03EE2006A] as part of the ‘7. Energieforschungsprogramm’.
期刊介绍:
Surface Engineering provides a forum for the publication of refereed material on both the theory and practice of this important enabling technology, embracing science, technology and engineering. Coverage includes design, surface modification technologies and process control, and the characterisation and properties of the final system or component, including quality control and non-destructive examination.