{"title":"三层图式之外:产品体验的竞争模型","authors":"Cecilia Luca","doi":"10.1504/jdr.2023.133263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the formal structure of some design theories of product experience in order to highlight their fundamental, if largely implicit, assumptions. Even though building on different perspectives and with different focuses of interest, many authors address the theme of experience in the light of a shared conceptual structure. The three-level schema, on which they agree, mirrors the traditional philosophical distinction between primary, secondary and tertiary qualities. I will argue that the reason for this similarity lies in the acceptance of a shared paradigm, that of object-subject dualism. This fundamental world-view creates an unbridgeable separation between the material structure of an artefact and its meanings, hindering the attempt towards a true understanding of experience. The adoption of a pragmatist approach, which is based on different fundamental assumptions, leads to frameworks that truly do justice to the complex, dynamic and situated nature of experience.","PeriodicalId":35082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the three-level schema: competing models of product experience\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/jdr.2023.133263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on the formal structure of some design theories of product experience in order to highlight their fundamental, if largely implicit, assumptions. Even though building on different perspectives and with different focuses of interest, many authors address the theme of experience in the light of a shared conceptual structure. The three-level schema, on which they agree, mirrors the traditional philosophical distinction between primary, secondary and tertiary qualities. I will argue that the reason for this similarity lies in the acceptance of a shared paradigm, that of object-subject dualism. This fundamental world-view creates an unbridgeable separation between the material structure of an artefact and its meanings, hindering the attempt towards a true understanding of experience. The adoption of a pragmatist approach, which is based on different fundamental assumptions, leads to frameworks that truly do justice to the complex, dynamic and situated nature of experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/jdr.2023.133263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/jdr.2023.133263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond the three-level schema: competing models of product experience
This paper focuses on the formal structure of some design theories of product experience in order to highlight their fundamental, if largely implicit, assumptions. Even though building on different perspectives and with different focuses of interest, many authors address the theme of experience in the light of a shared conceptual structure. The three-level schema, on which they agree, mirrors the traditional philosophical distinction between primary, secondary and tertiary qualities. I will argue that the reason for this similarity lies in the acceptance of a shared paradigm, that of object-subject dualism. This fundamental world-view creates an unbridgeable separation between the material structure of an artefact and its meanings, hindering the attempt towards a true understanding of experience. The adoption of a pragmatist approach, which is based on different fundamental assumptions, leads to frameworks that truly do justice to the complex, dynamic and situated nature of experience.
期刊介绍:
JDR is an interdisciplinary journal, emphasising human aspects as a central issue of design through integrative studies of social sciences and design disciplines. Originally published as an electronic journal publishing articles including multimedia applications and hence allowing visual knowledge transfer, it is now also available in print. Topics covered include Expertise in design Design learning strategies and design pedagogy Design as a social process Gaming and simulation in design Designing user interfaces The role of visual techniques in the design process Design tools Sustainability.