接受ADHD药物治疗的成人精神药物的处方模式:2019年日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库(NDB)的分析

Kanako Ishizuka
{"title":"接受ADHD药物治疗的成人精神药物的处方模式:2019年日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库(NDB)的分析","authors":"Kanako Ishizuka","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of psychotropic polypharmacy, defined as the use of medication from two or more psychotropic classes, is quite common in clinical practice despite limited evidence of efficacy and mounting safety concerns. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most disabling and common psychiatric disorders, persisting from childhood to adulthood. Individuals with ADHD are known to have many comorbid psychopathologies, making them candidates for psychotropic polypharmacy.1 In Japan, the approved psychotropic medications and the diagnosed disorders differ between pediatric and adult populations. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the utilization of multiple classes of psychotropics among patients undergoing ADHD pharmacotherapy, specifically targeting the adult population in Japan. A retrospective study was conducted using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which covered 99.9% of public health insurance claims from hospitals, 97.9% from clinics, and 99.9% from pharmacies as of May 2015. The sampling data set of outpatients consisted of 1% of all claims data that were randomly extracted based on standard demographic characteristics in terms of age and sex in Japan, and included anonymized data on diagnoses, prescribed medications, examinations conducted, age group, and sex. Since the sensitivity of diagnoses in the database is generally low,2, 3 this study focused on pharmacotherapy. Data on individuals aged 20 years and over prescribed any of three ADHD medications as of October 2019 were retrieved from the NDB. The number of psychotropic medications prescribed concurrently with ADHD medications—atomoxetine, guanfacine, and the osmotic-controlled-release oral delivery system methylphenidate—was identified. The drug classification, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics/hypnotics, and mood stabilizers, is shown in Supporting Information: Table S1. DB Browser for SQLite Version 3.12.2 for macOS (https://sqlitebrowser.org) was used for analysis. Less than half of individuals in their 20s and nearly 20% of those over age 30 were prescribed ADHD medications alone. Among patients in their 20s, anxiolytics/hypnotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics were prescribed at similar rates, while among those aged 30 and above, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics were more frequently prescribed (Table 1). Based on these observations, two potential scenarios emerge. The first one is that ADHD medications were prescribed to those who meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. In this case, adults with ADHD might exhibit multiple psychiatric symptoms to require polypharmacy of psychiatric medications. The second scenario is that pharmacotherapy for ADHD was being administered to individuals who might not fully meet the ADHD diagnostic criteria, but who are experiencing specific symptoms, such as issues with attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. The author and colleagues revealed that the levels of adult patients' self-perceived ADHD characteristics were significantly associated with the severity of depressive symptoms,4 indicating that diagnosing ADHD by the self-administered questionnaire alone might overestimate its prevalence, especially when the depressive state becomes severe. Before considering prescribing ADHD medications, an assessment of the patient's core psychiatric problem is essential to avoid unnecessary polypharmacy. In any case, the use of psychotropic combinations might be justified as long as prescribed by well-trained providers.5 According to a survey using the NDB, approximately 40% of individuals with ADHD are newly diagnosed after age 19 years.6 Considering that over 70% of Japanese patients prescribed psychotropic medications receive either a single or two-drug prescription,7 and that the prescription rates of anxiolytics/hypnotics remained high despite four medical fee reductions in reimbursement between 2012 and 2018 to promote the appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in Japan,8 further research is needed to investigate the risk factors and explore preventive interventions for adults who require polypharmacy involving ADHD medications and other psychotropic drugs. There are several limitations to the present study. First, this cross-sectional study might have overestimated polypharmacy since it did not account for unintended polypharmacy resulting from medication switching. Second, information regarding the medication adherence was not available in this data set. If a patient did not take the prescribed medication as directed by the physician, additional medications might be added due to insufficient symptom improvement. Third, the entire population was not accounted for by the NDB, which comprised 1% of all claims data. Nevertheless, this study provides representative evidence of the prescription patterns of psychotropics with ADHD medications in Japan. Whether psychotropic polypharmacy in adulthood with ADHD symptoms is excessive, appropriate, or insufficient is still under debate and requires further longitudinal evaluation. Furthermore, evidence of the efficacy and safety is needed to guide psychotropic polypharmacy practice. Kanako Ishizuka conceived of conception and design of the study, performed the data collection and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript and figure. The author would like to sincerely thank the Initiative for Clinical Epidemiology Research for their invaluable assistance, especially the SQL program. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant JP20K16625). The author declares no conflicts of interest. N/A N/A. N/A. N/A Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription patterns of psychotropics for adults treated with ADHD medications: Analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) of 2019\",\"authors\":\"Kanako Ishizuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pcn5.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of psychotropic polypharmacy, defined as the use of medication from two or more psychotropic classes, is quite common in clinical practice despite limited evidence of efficacy and mounting safety concerns. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most disabling and common psychiatric disorders, persisting from childhood to adulthood. Individuals with ADHD are known to have many comorbid psychopathologies, making them candidates for psychotropic polypharmacy.1 In Japan, the approved psychotropic medications and the diagnosed disorders differ between pediatric and adult populations. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the utilization of multiple classes of psychotropics among patients undergoing ADHD pharmacotherapy, specifically targeting the adult population in Japan. A retrospective study was conducted using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which covered 99.9% of public health insurance claims from hospitals, 97.9% from clinics, and 99.9% from pharmacies as of May 2015. The sampling data set of outpatients consisted of 1% of all claims data that were randomly extracted based on standard demographic characteristics in terms of age and sex in Japan, and included anonymized data on diagnoses, prescribed medications, examinations conducted, age group, and sex. Since the sensitivity of diagnoses in the database is generally low,2, 3 this study focused on pharmacotherapy. Data on individuals aged 20 years and over prescribed any of three ADHD medications as of October 2019 were retrieved from the NDB. The number of psychotropic medications prescribed concurrently with ADHD medications—atomoxetine, guanfacine, and the osmotic-controlled-release oral delivery system methylphenidate—was identified. The drug classification, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics/hypnotics, and mood stabilizers, is shown in Supporting Information: Table S1. DB Browser for SQLite Version 3.12.2 for macOS (https://sqlitebrowser.org) was used for analysis. Less than half of individuals in their 20s and nearly 20% of those over age 30 were prescribed ADHD medications alone. Among patients in their 20s, anxiolytics/hypnotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics were prescribed at similar rates, while among those aged 30 and above, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics were more frequently prescribed (Table 1). Based on these observations, two potential scenarios emerge. The first one is that ADHD medications were prescribed to those who meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. In this case, adults with ADHD might exhibit multiple psychiatric symptoms to require polypharmacy of psychiatric medications. The second scenario is that pharmacotherapy for ADHD was being administered to individuals who might not fully meet the ADHD diagnostic criteria, but who are experiencing specific symptoms, such as issues with attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. The author and colleagues revealed that the levels of adult patients' self-perceived ADHD characteristics were significantly associated with the severity of depressive symptoms,4 indicating that diagnosing ADHD by the self-administered questionnaire alone might overestimate its prevalence, especially when the depressive state becomes severe. Before considering prescribing ADHD medications, an assessment of the patient's core psychiatric problem is essential to avoid unnecessary polypharmacy. In any case, the use of psychotropic combinations might be justified as long as prescribed by well-trained providers.5 According to a survey using the NDB, approximately 40% of individuals with ADHD are newly diagnosed after age 19 years.6 Considering that over 70% of Japanese patients prescribed psychotropic medications receive either a single or two-drug prescription,7 and that the prescription rates of anxiolytics/hypnotics remained high despite four medical fee reductions in reimbursement between 2012 and 2018 to promote the appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in Japan,8 further research is needed to investigate the risk factors and explore preventive interventions for adults who require polypharmacy involving ADHD medications and other psychotropic drugs. There are several limitations to the present study. First, this cross-sectional study might have overestimated polypharmacy since it did not account for unintended polypharmacy resulting from medication switching. Second, information regarding the medication adherence was not available in this data set. If a patient did not take the prescribed medication as directed by the physician, additional medications might be added due to insufficient symptom improvement. Third, the entire population was not accounted for by the NDB, which comprised 1% of all claims data. Nevertheless, this study provides representative evidence of the prescription patterns of psychotropics with ADHD medications in Japan. Whether psychotropic polypharmacy in adulthood with ADHD symptoms is excessive, appropriate, or insufficient is still under debate and requires further longitudinal evaluation. Furthermore, evidence of the efficacy and safety is needed to guide psychotropic polypharmacy practice. Kanako Ishizuka conceived of conception and design of the study, performed the data collection and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript and figure. The author would like to sincerely thank the Initiative for Clinical Epidemiology Research for their invaluable assistance, especially the SQL program. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant JP20K16625). The author declares no conflicts of interest. N/A N/A. N/A. N/A Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多种精神药物的使用,定义为使用两种或两种以上精神药物类别的药物,在临床实践中相当普遍,尽管有效性证据有限,安全性担忧日益增加。注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种最致残和最常见的精神疾病,从童年持续到成年。众所周知,ADHD患者有许多共病精神病理,使他们成为精神药物的候选人在日本,批准的精神药物和诊断的疾病在儿童和成人人群中有所不同。因此,本研究旨在探讨在接受ADHD药物治疗的患者中,多类精神药物的使用情况,特别针对日本的成年人群。利用日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库(NDB)进行了一项回顾性研究,截至2015年5月,该数据库涵盖了来自医院的99.9%、诊所的97.9%和药店的99.9%的公共健康保险索赔。门诊患者的抽样数据集占所有索赔数据的1%,这些数据是根据日本年龄和性别的标准人口统计学特征随机抽取的,包括诊断、处方药物、进行的检查、年龄组和性别的匿名数据。由于数据库中诊断的敏感性通常较低,因此本研究侧重于药物治疗。截至2019年10月,从NDB中检索了年龄在20岁及以上的人的数据,这些人服用了三种ADHD药物中的任何一种。确定了与ADHD药物同时开具的精神药物的数量——阿托西汀、胍法辛和渗透控释口服给药系统哌甲酯。药物分类,包括抗精神病药、抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药/催眠药和情绪稳定药,见辅助信息:表S1。使用DB Browser for SQLite Version 3.12.2 for macOS (https://sqlitebrowser.org)进行分析。不到一半的20多岁的人和近20%的30岁以上的人单独服用了ADHD药物。在20多岁的患者中,抗焦虑药/催眠药、抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的处方率相似,而在30岁及以上的患者中,抗抑郁药和抗焦虑药/催眠药的处方率更高(表1)。基于这些观察,出现了两种可能的情况。第一个是ADHD药物是给那些符合ADHD诊断标准的人开的。在这种情况下,患有多动症的成年人可能表现出多种精神症状,需要多种精神药物治疗。第二种情况是,ADHD的药物治疗是针对那些可能不完全符合ADHD诊断标准,但有特定症状的人进行的,比如注意力不集中、冲动和多动。作者及其同事发现,成年患者自我感知ADHD特征的水平与抑郁症状的严重程度显著相关,4表明仅通过自我管理问卷诊断ADHD可能高估了其患病率,特别是当抑郁状态变得严重时。在考虑开ADHD药物之前,对患者的核心精神问题进行评估是必不可少的,以避免不必要的多重用药。在任何情况下,只要由训练有素的提供者开出处方,使用精神药物组合可能是合理的根据NDB的一项调查,大约40%的ADHD患者是在19岁以后才被诊断出来的考虑到超过70%的日本精神药物患者接受单药或双药处方7,尽管日本在2012年至2018年期间四次降低医疗费用报销,以促进精神药物的合理使用,但抗焦虑药/催眠药的处方率仍然很高8,需要进一步研究涉及ADHD的成人需要多种药物治疗的危险因素并探索预防干预措施药物和其他精神药物。本研究有几个局限性。首先,这项横断面研究可能高估了多药作用,因为它没有考虑到药物转换导致的意外多药作用。其次,关于药物依从性的信息在这个数据集中是不可用的。如果患者没有按照医生的指示服用处方药物,由于症状改善不足,可能会增加额外的药物。第三,NDB没有考虑到整个人口,它只占所有索赔数据的1%。然而,本研究为日本精神类药物与ADHD药物的处方模式提供了有代表性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescription patterns of psychotropics for adults treated with ADHD medications: Analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) of 2019
The use of psychotropic polypharmacy, defined as the use of medication from two or more psychotropic classes, is quite common in clinical practice despite limited evidence of efficacy and mounting safety concerns. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most disabling and common psychiatric disorders, persisting from childhood to adulthood. Individuals with ADHD are known to have many comorbid psychopathologies, making them candidates for psychotropic polypharmacy.1 In Japan, the approved psychotropic medications and the diagnosed disorders differ between pediatric and adult populations. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the utilization of multiple classes of psychotropics among patients undergoing ADHD pharmacotherapy, specifically targeting the adult population in Japan. A retrospective study was conducted using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which covered 99.9% of public health insurance claims from hospitals, 97.9% from clinics, and 99.9% from pharmacies as of May 2015. The sampling data set of outpatients consisted of 1% of all claims data that were randomly extracted based on standard demographic characteristics in terms of age and sex in Japan, and included anonymized data on diagnoses, prescribed medications, examinations conducted, age group, and sex. Since the sensitivity of diagnoses in the database is generally low,2, 3 this study focused on pharmacotherapy. Data on individuals aged 20 years and over prescribed any of three ADHD medications as of October 2019 were retrieved from the NDB. The number of psychotropic medications prescribed concurrently with ADHD medications—atomoxetine, guanfacine, and the osmotic-controlled-release oral delivery system methylphenidate—was identified. The drug classification, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics/hypnotics, and mood stabilizers, is shown in Supporting Information: Table S1. DB Browser for SQLite Version 3.12.2 for macOS (https://sqlitebrowser.org) was used for analysis. Less than half of individuals in their 20s and nearly 20% of those over age 30 were prescribed ADHD medications alone. Among patients in their 20s, anxiolytics/hypnotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics were prescribed at similar rates, while among those aged 30 and above, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics were more frequently prescribed (Table 1). Based on these observations, two potential scenarios emerge. The first one is that ADHD medications were prescribed to those who meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. In this case, adults with ADHD might exhibit multiple psychiatric symptoms to require polypharmacy of psychiatric medications. The second scenario is that pharmacotherapy for ADHD was being administered to individuals who might not fully meet the ADHD diagnostic criteria, but who are experiencing specific symptoms, such as issues with attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. The author and colleagues revealed that the levels of adult patients' self-perceived ADHD characteristics were significantly associated with the severity of depressive symptoms,4 indicating that diagnosing ADHD by the self-administered questionnaire alone might overestimate its prevalence, especially when the depressive state becomes severe. Before considering prescribing ADHD medications, an assessment of the patient's core psychiatric problem is essential to avoid unnecessary polypharmacy. In any case, the use of psychotropic combinations might be justified as long as prescribed by well-trained providers.5 According to a survey using the NDB, approximately 40% of individuals with ADHD are newly diagnosed after age 19 years.6 Considering that over 70% of Japanese patients prescribed psychotropic medications receive either a single or two-drug prescription,7 and that the prescription rates of anxiolytics/hypnotics remained high despite four medical fee reductions in reimbursement between 2012 and 2018 to promote the appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in Japan,8 further research is needed to investigate the risk factors and explore preventive interventions for adults who require polypharmacy involving ADHD medications and other psychotropic drugs. There are several limitations to the present study. First, this cross-sectional study might have overestimated polypharmacy since it did not account for unintended polypharmacy resulting from medication switching. Second, information regarding the medication adherence was not available in this data set. If a patient did not take the prescribed medication as directed by the physician, additional medications might be added due to insufficient symptom improvement. Third, the entire population was not accounted for by the NDB, which comprised 1% of all claims data. Nevertheless, this study provides representative evidence of the prescription patterns of psychotropics with ADHD medications in Japan. Whether psychotropic polypharmacy in adulthood with ADHD symptoms is excessive, appropriate, or insufficient is still under debate and requires further longitudinal evaluation. Furthermore, evidence of the efficacy and safety is needed to guide psychotropic polypharmacy practice. Kanako Ishizuka conceived of conception and design of the study, performed the data collection and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript and figure. The author would like to sincerely thank the Initiative for Clinical Epidemiology Research for their invaluable assistance, especially the SQL program. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant JP20K16625). The author declares no conflicts of interest. N/A N/A. N/A. N/A Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信