从通用技能到行为监控:探索公私关系中关键技能框架的实体化

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ida Martinez Lunde
{"title":"从通用技能到行为监控:探索公私关系中关键技能框架的实体化","authors":"Ida Martinez Lunde","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2023.2259814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how responses to a generic skills framework are materialised in Irish schools, and the main aim is to shed light on multiple dimensions of policy enactment. The Key Skills Framework (KSF) was introduced as part of a curricular reform in Irish lower secondary schools – a reform that has met substantial resistance locally and nationally. This study investigated local responses to the KSF specifically by interrogating its particular materialisations in practice through Actor-Network Theory (‘spaces of prescription’ and ‘spaces of negotiation’). The findings indicate that there is an inherent multiplicity to the KSF that nevertheless suggests it has been reduced to represent national traditions of behaviour monitoring and disciplinary routines, rather than intentions of enhancing thinking, learning and living more commonly found in generic skills frameworks. These findings are coupled with discussions of the nature of governing actors in Irish education, including the presence of (new) private vendors.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From generic skills to behaviour monitoring: exploring materialisations of the key skills framework in public–private relationships\",\"authors\":\"Ida Martinez Lunde\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220620.2023.2259814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how responses to a generic skills framework are materialised in Irish schools, and the main aim is to shed light on multiple dimensions of policy enactment. The Key Skills Framework (KSF) was introduced as part of a curricular reform in Irish lower secondary schools – a reform that has met substantial resistance locally and nationally. This study investigated local responses to the KSF specifically by interrogating its particular materialisations in practice through Actor-Network Theory (‘spaces of prescription’ and ‘spaces of negotiation’). The findings indicate that there is an inherent multiplicity to the KSF that nevertheless suggests it has been reduced to represent national traditions of behaviour monitoring and disciplinary routines, rather than intentions of enhancing thinking, learning and living more commonly found in generic skills frameworks. These findings are coupled with discussions of the nature of governing actors in Irish education, including the presence of (new) private vendors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2023.2259814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2023.2259814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了对通用技能框架的反应如何在爱尔兰学校实现,主要目的是阐明政策制定的多个维度。关键技能框架(KSF)是作为爱尔兰初中课程改革的一部分引入的,这一改革在地方和全国都遇到了很大的阻力。本研究通过行动者网络理论(“处方空间”和“协商空间”)对实践中的特定物质化进行了质疑,具体调查了当地对KSF的反应。研究结果表明,KSF具有内在的多样性,但这表明它已被简化为代表国家行为监测和纪律惯例的传统,而不是在通用技能框架中更常见的增强思维、学习和生活的意图。这些发现与爱尔兰教育中管理行为者的性质的讨论相结合,包括(新的)私人供应商的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From generic skills to behaviour monitoring: exploring materialisations of the key skills framework in public–private relationships
This article explores how responses to a generic skills framework are materialised in Irish schools, and the main aim is to shed light on multiple dimensions of policy enactment. The Key Skills Framework (KSF) was introduced as part of a curricular reform in Irish lower secondary schools – a reform that has met substantial resistance locally and nationally. This study investigated local responses to the KSF specifically by interrogating its particular materialisations in practice through Actor-Network Theory (‘spaces of prescription’ and ‘spaces of negotiation’). The findings indicate that there is an inherent multiplicity to the KSF that nevertheless suggests it has been reduced to represent national traditions of behaviour monitoring and disciplinary routines, rather than intentions of enhancing thinking, learning and living more commonly found in generic skills frameworks. These findings are coupled with discussions of the nature of governing actors in Irish education, including the presence of (new) private vendors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration and History
Journal of Educational Administration and History EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信