首次直接观察到南露脊鲸(Eubalaena australis)在南非沿海水域成功产子

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Loraine Shuttleworth, Ash Appleby, Robin Appleby, Els Vermeulen
{"title":"首次直接观察到南露脊鲸(Eubalaena australis)在南非沿海水域成功产子","authors":"Loraine Shuttleworth,&nbsp;Ash Appleby,&nbsp;Robin Appleby,&nbsp;Els Vermeulen","doi":"10.1111/mms.13091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Southern right whale females (<i>Eubalaena australis</i>, hereafter SRWs) usually migrate between higher latitudes where they forage in summer to coastal areas at lower latitudes where they give birth and nurse their young in winter (Best, <span>2000</span>). In South Africa, the SRW calving season extends between late June to late October, with a birthing peak in August (Best, <span>1994</span>). This predictable coastal presence has enabled population monitoring since the late 1960s by means of annual aerial surveys (e.g., Best, <span>1990</span>; Best et al., <span>2001</span>). In addition to monitoring population recovery postwhaling, these long-term surveys have also allowed for the observational assessment of reproductive parameters. As such, the age at first parturition in the population was estimated at 8 years with an average calving interval of 3 years and an estimated gestation length of 12–13 months (Best, <span>1994</span>; Best et al., <span>2001</span>). However, despite these long-term research efforts, very little is known regarding the actual birthing event in SRWs (Best, <span>1994</span>). Three accounts of possible SRW births off the coast of South Africa have briefly been discussed in Best (<span>1970</span>) and Best (<span>1981</span>) but they all relate to anecdotal evidence from distant shore-based observations.</p><p>Documentation of SRW births is equally rare across calving grounds throughout the southern hemisphere. In 2012, an unsuccessful birth was documented in Argentina (Península Valdés) from a whale watching vessel and reported in Sironi et al. (<span>2019</span>). The authors suggested that there were a few possible factors indicating that this was an abnormal parturition including the repeated protrusion and withdrawal of the calf, lengthy time-period before full expulsion of the calf, and resighting of the female without a calf (Sironi et al., <span>2019</span>). However, despite the increasing boat-based presence around SRWs, mostly in the form of whale-based tourism, close and detailed observation of a successful birth has, to our knowledge, never been directly observed and documented. Therefore, here we report the first documented successful SRW birth observed along the South African coast, supplemented with photographic evidence.</p><p>In early July 2022, the commercial whale-watching boat <i>Miroshca</i> (length: 18 m; engine specifications: two John Deere 9 L inboard engines) of the whale-watching company Southern Right Charters encountered a lone SRW in Walker Bay, Hermanus, South Africa. For three to four consecutive days, what appeared to be the same animal was observed in approximately the same location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E) performing short but steep fluking dives. As this type of behavior is typically enjoyed by tourists and rare to see repetitively, the vessel deliberately headed to the same coordinates during each trip considering the high likelihood of such an exciting encounter. Based on the near unchanging location (as indicated by the tracks and coordinates on the skipper's GPS) and unchanged behavior of the animal, it was presumed that it was the same animal being observed each day. However, this could not be verified with photo-identification data.</p><p>When the same location was approached on July 5, 2022, around 16:35, there were no whales in sight. Nevertheless, the vessel approached the area slowly as a precaution based on the encounters of the previous days. This approach was halted when a whale lunged out of the water ahead of the boat at approximately 300 m at 16:39. Considering the location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E; depth: 41 m; sea surface temperature [SST]: approximately 14°C) it was believed that this was the same individual that had been seen the previous few days. Due to this behavior, a crew member began to take photographs (using a Nikon D3300 with an AF-S NIKKOR 200–500 mm 5.6E ED lens). During the lunge, the whale made a barrel roll movement turning onto her back and vigorously pushing her genital area upward. At that time, a small fluke could be seen protruding from her genital slit and the water around the whale turned red presumably with blood (Figure 1a taken at 16:39). Other displayed behavior included arching (Weilgart &amp; Whitehead, <span>1986</span>), lurching (Leatherwood &amp; Beach, <span>1975</span>), rotating (Stacey &amp; Baird, <span>1997</span>), and thrashing (Zani et al., <span>2008</span>). Mere seconds later, the calf was expelled from the female's body, its head seen above the water. The head showed the beginnings of a callosity pattern forming but completely lacked any cyamid coverage (Figure 1b taken at 16:41). Fetal folds along the lateral side of the body and a “curly” tail characteristic of newborn cetaceans (Faria, <span>2013</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>) could also be observed. Soon after expulsion, the bleeding decreased substantially, and photographs taken at 16:42 no longer had signs of blood in the water. No placental material was observed in the surrounding water immediately following the birth.</p><p>The mother did not appear to assist the calf in any way to surface or swim immediately postexpulsion. In fact, immediately after birth, both the mother and newborn calf swam on without signs of physical contact. This is consistent with behavior observed during a North Atlantic right whale <i>(Eubalaena glacialis)</i> birth event reported by Foley et al. (<span>2011</span>). There were no other SRWs present in the area during the entire event. As no attempts were made to approach or follow the pair in accordance with whale watching permit conditions in South Africa, this ended the observation.</p><p>Only a few other birthing events have been described for baleen whales, including two births of North Atlantic right whales in the coastal waters of the United States (Foley et al., <span>2011</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), a humpback whale (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) at Sainte Marie Island, Madagascar (Faria, <span>2013</span>), in Lahaina, Maui (Patton &amp; Lawless, <span>2021</span>), in Hawaii, (Silvers et al., <span>1997</span>) and on the northeast coast Brazil (Ferreira et al., <span>2011</span>), the birth of a gray whale (<i>Eschrichtius robustus</i>) in Mexico (Mills &amp; Mills, <span>1979</span>) and the unsuccessful SRW birth at Península Valdés, Argentina (Sironi et al., <span>2019</span>). In general, the maternal behavior during the parturition described here is similar to the behavior observed in other successful cetacean births, which may include thrashing (Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), arched back positions (e.g., Weilgart &amp; Whitehead, <span>1986</span>), lurching and tail spasms (e.g., Leatherwood &amp; Beach, <span>1975</span>), and rotating (Stacey &amp; Baird, <span>1997</span>). No maternal assistance for calf surfacing immediately after birth was observed, as opposed to what has been documented in some other baleen whale birthing events (e.g., Ferreira et al., <span>2011</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), but not in all (see Foley et al., <span>2011</span>; Ransom et al., <span>2022</span>). Although it is difficult to determine when labor truly began, the behavior identified by the crew as a parturition event was short (&lt;2 min) possibly explaining why these birthing events are so rare to observe and document (Ransom et al., 2022). We therefore highlight the value of opportunistic data when collecting information on the behavior and ecology of cetaceans. Especially when unusual behaviors are observed, documentation through detailed description and photographic evidence is crucial in our bid to improve our understanding of various aspects of cetacean behavior and ecology. The documentation of this event has expanded our knowledge of some behavioral aspects of a SRW birth, yet there is still much that remains unknown such as, length of labor, initiation of lactation, etc. Aerial and underwater footage could be particularly useful to further our understanding of these events as is shown by Patton &amp; Lawless (<span>2021</span>).</p><p><b>Loraine Shuttleworth</b> and <b>Els Vermeulen:</b> Investigation; writing and editing. <b>Ash Appleby:</b> Data curation; resources; validation; writing – review and editing. <b>Robin Appleby:</b> Data curation; resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.13091","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First direct observation of a successful southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) birth in South African coastal waters\",\"authors\":\"Loraine Shuttleworth,&nbsp;Ash Appleby,&nbsp;Robin Appleby,&nbsp;Els Vermeulen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mms.13091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Southern right whale females (<i>Eubalaena australis</i>, hereafter SRWs) usually migrate between higher latitudes where they forage in summer to coastal areas at lower latitudes where they give birth and nurse their young in winter (Best, <span>2000</span>). In South Africa, the SRW calving season extends between late June to late October, with a birthing peak in August (Best, <span>1994</span>). This predictable coastal presence has enabled population monitoring since the late 1960s by means of annual aerial surveys (e.g., Best, <span>1990</span>; Best et al., <span>2001</span>). In addition to monitoring population recovery postwhaling, these long-term surveys have also allowed for the observational assessment of reproductive parameters. As such, the age at first parturition in the population was estimated at 8 years with an average calving interval of 3 years and an estimated gestation length of 12–13 months (Best, <span>1994</span>; Best et al., <span>2001</span>). However, despite these long-term research efforts, very little is known regarding the actual birthing event in SRWs (Best, <span>1994</span>). Three accounts of possible SRW births off the coast of South Africa have briefly been discussed in Best (<span>1970</span>) and Best (<span>1981</span>) but they all relate to anecdotal evidence from distant shore-based observations.</p><p>Documentation of SRW births is equally rare across calving grounds throughout the southern hemisphere. In 2012, an unsuccessful birth was documented in Argentina (Península Valdés) from a whale watching vessel and reported in Sironi et al. (<span>2019</span>). The authors suggested that there were a few possible factors indicating that this was an abnormal parturition including the repeated protrusion and withdrawal of the calf, lengthy time-period before full expulsion of the calf, and resighting of the female without a calf (Sironi et al., <span>2019</span>). However, despite the increasing boat-based presence around SRWs, mostly in the form of whale-based tourism, close and detailed observation of a successful birth has, to our knowledge, never been directly observed and documented. Therefore, here we report the first documented successful SRW birth observed along the South African coast, supplemented with photographic evidence.</p><p>In early July 2022, the commercial whale-watching boat <i>Miroshca</i> (length: 18 m; engine specifications: two John Deere 9 L inboard engines) of the whale-watching company Southern Right Charters encountered a lone SRW in Walker Bay, Hermanus, South Africa. For three to four consecutive days, what appeared to be the same animal was observed in approximately the same location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E) performing short but steep fluking dives. As this type of behavior is typically enjoyed by tourists and rare to see repetitively, the vessel deliberately headed to the same coordinates during each trip considering the high likelihood of such an exciting encounter. Based on the near unchanging location (as indicated by the tracks and coordinates on the skipper's GPS) and unchanged behavior of the animal, it was presumed that it was the same animal being observed each day. However, this could not be verified with photo-identification data.</p><p>When the same location was approached on July 5, 2022, around 16:35, there were no whales in sight. Nevertheless, the vessel approached the area slowly as a precaution based on the encounters of the previous days. This approach was halted when a whale lunged out of the water ahead of the boat at approximately 300 m at 16:39. Considering the location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E; depth: 41 m; sea surface temperature [SST]: approximately 14°C) it was believed that this was the same individual that had been seen the previous few days. Due to this behavior, a crew member began to take photographs (using a Nikon D3300 with an AF-S NIKKOR 200–500 mm 5.6E ED lens). During the lunge, the whale made a barrel roll movement turning onto her back and vigorously pushing her genital area upward. At that time, a small fluke could be seen protruding from her genital slit and the water around the whale turned red presumably with blood (Figure 1a taken at 16:39). Other displayed behavior included arching (Weilgart &amp; Whitehead, <span>1986</span>), lurching (Leatherwood &amp; Beach, <span>1975</span>), rotating (Stacey &amp; Baird, <span>1997</span>), and thrashing (Zani et al., <span>2008</span>). Mere seconds later, the calf was expelled from the female's body, its head seen above the water. The head showed the beginnings of a callosity pattern forming but completely lacked any cyamid coverage (Figure 1b taken at 16:41). Fetal folds along the lateral side of the body and a “curly” tail characteristic of newborn cetaceans (Faria, <span>2013</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>) could also be observed. Soon after expulsion, the bleeding decreased substantially, and photographs taken at 16:42 no longer had signs of blood in the water. No placental material was observed in the surrounding water immediately following the birth.</p><p>The mother did not appear to assist the calf in any way to surface or swim immediately postexpulsion. In fact, immediately after birth, both the mother and newborn calf swam on without signs of physical contact. This is consistent with behavior observed during a North Atlantic right whale <i>(Eubalaena glacialis)</i> birth event reported by Foley et al. (<span>2011</span>). There were no other SRWs present in the area during the entire event. As no attempts were made to approach or follow the pair in accordance with whale watching permit conditions in South Africa, this ended the observation.</p><p>Only a few other birthing events have been described for baleen whales, including two births of North Atlantic right whales in the coastal waters of the United States (Foley et al., <span>2011</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), a humpback whale (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) at Sainte Marie Island, Madagascar (Faria, <span>2013</span>), in Lahaina, Maui (Patton &amp; Lawless, <span>2021</span>), in Hawaii, (Silvers et al., <span>1997</span>) and on the northeast coast Brazil (Ferreira et al., <span>2011</span>), the birth of a gray whale (<i>Eschrichtius robustus</i>) in Mexico (Mills &amp; Mills, <span>1979</span>) and the unsuccessful SRW birth at Península Valdés, Argentina (Sironi et al., <span>2019</span>). In general, the maternal behavior during the parturition described here is similar to the behavior observed in other successful cetacean births, which may include thrashing (Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), arched back positions (e.g., Weilgart &amp; Whitehead, <span>1986</span>), lurching and tail spasms (e.g., Leatherwood &amp; Beach, <span>1975</span>), and rotating (Stacey &amp; Baird, <span>1997</span>). No maternal assistance for calf surfacing immediately after birth was observed, as opposed to what has been documented in some other baleen whale birthing events (e.g., Ferreira et al., <span>2011</span>; Zani et al., <span>2008</span>), but not in all (see Foley et al., <span>2011</span>; Ransom et al., <span>2022</span>). Although it is difficult to determine when labor truly began, the behavior identified by the crew as a parturition event was short (&lt;2 min) possibly explaining why these birthing events are so rare to observe and document (Ransom et al., 2022). We therefore highlight the value of opportunistic data when collecting information on the behavior and ecology of cetaceans. Especially when unusual behaviors are observed, documentation through detailed description and photographic evidence is crucial in our bid to improve our understanding of various aspects of cetacean behavior and ecology. The documentation of this event has expanded our knowledge of some behavioral aspects of a SRW birth, yet there is still much that remains unknown such as, length of labor, initiation of lactation, etc. Aerial and underwater footage could be particularly useful to further our understanding of these events as is shown by Patton &amp; Lawless (<span>2021</span>).</p><p><b>Loraine Shuttleworth</b> and <b>Els Vermeulen:</b> Investigation; writing and editing. <b>Ash Appleby:</b> Data curation; resources; validation; writing – review and editing. <b>Robin Appleby:</b> Data curation; resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mms.13091\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mms.13091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mms.13091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雌性南露脊鲸(Eubalaena australis,以下简称srw)通常在高纬度地区之间迁徙,夏季在高纬度地区觅食,冬季在低纬度地区分娩和哺育幼鲸(Best, 2000)。在南非,小白鲸的产犊季节从6月下旬延续到10月下旬,8月为产犊高峰(Best, 1994)。自1960年代末以来,这种可预测的沿海存在使得能够通过年度空中调查进行人口监测(例如,Best, 1990年;Best et al., 2001)。除了监测捕鲸后的种群恢复外,这些长期调查还允许对生殖参数进行观察性评估。因此,人口中首次分娩的年龄估计为8岁,平均产犊间隔为3年,估计妊娠期为12-13个月(Best, 1994;Best et al., 2001)。然而,尽管有这些长期的研究努力,关于srw的实际分娩事件知之甚少(Best, 1994)。在Best(1970)和Best(1981)中简要讨论了三种可能的SRW在南非海岸出生的情况,但它们都与来自遥远海岸观察的轶事证据有关。在整个南半球的产犊地,SRW出生的记录同样罕见。2012年,阿根廷一艘观鲸船上记录了一次不成功的分娩(Península vald录影带),并在Sironi等人(2019年)中报道。作者认为,有几个可能的因素表明这是一次异常分娩,包括小牛反复凸出和缩回,小牛完全排出前的长时间,以及在没有小牛的情况下雌性再孵(Sironi et al., 2019)。然而,尽管越来越多的船只出现在srw附近,主要是以鲸鱼旅游的形式,但据我们所知,对成功分娩的近距离和详细观察从未被直接观察和记录。因此,在这里,我们报告了沿南非海岸观察到的第一个记录成功的SRW出生,并辅以照片证据。2022年7月初,商业观鲸船米罗什卡号(长度:18米;在南非赫曼努斯的沃克湾,观鲸公司Southern Right Charters的两艘约翰迪尔(John Deere) 9l内舷发动机遇到了一艘孤独的SRW。连续三到四天,在大约相同的位置(34°26.57'S, 19°15.40'E附近)观察到似乎是同一只动物,进行了短暂但陡峭的潜水。由于这种行为通常是游客喜欢的,而且很少会重复看到,考虑到这种令人兴奋的遭遇的可能性很高,船在每次航行中都故意驶向相同的坐标。根据几乎不变的位置(由船长的GPS上的轨迹和坐标显示)和动物不变的行为,可以推测它是每天观察到的同一只动物。但是,这一点无法用照片识别数据加以核实。当2022年7月5日16时35分左右到达同一地点时,没有看到鲸鱼。尽管如此,根据前几天的遭遇,作为一种预防措施,这艘船还是缓慢地靠近了该地区。16时39分,一条鲸鱼在船前方约300米的地方冲出水面,这一做法被叫停。考虑到位置(靠近34°26.57'S, 19°15.40'E;深度:41米;海面温度[SST]:大约14°C),人们相信这是前几天看到的同一个人。由于这种行为,一名机组人员开始拍照(使用尼康D3300与AF-S尼克尔200-500毫米5.6E ED镜头)。在猛扑的过程中,鲸鱼做了一个桶滚运动,转过身来,有力地将她的生殖器向上推。当时,可以看到一条小的吸虫从她的生殖器缝里伸出来,鲸鱼周围的水变成了红色,大概是血(图1a拍摄于16:39)。其他表现出的行为包括拱起(Weilgart & Whitehead, 1986),蹒跚(Leatherwood & Beach, 1975),旋转(Stacey & Baird, 1997)和殴打(Zani等人,2008)。仅仅几秒钟后,幼崽就从母鲸的身体中被排出,它的头露出水面。头部显示出开始形成的胼胝体模式,但完全没有任何氰胺覆盖(图1b拍摄于16:41)。新生鲸类动物的特征是身体外侧的胎儿褶皱和“卷曲”的尾巴(Faria, 2013;Zani et al., 2008)也可以观察到。驱逐后不久,出血明显减少,16点42分拍摄的照片中不再有水中有血的迹象。分娩后,在周围的水中没有观察到胎盘物质。母亲似乎没有以任何方式帮助小牛在驱逐后立即浮出水面或游泳。 事实上,出生后,母鲸和新生幼鲸都立即继续游动,没有身体接触的迹象。这与 Foley 等人(2011 年)报告的北大西洋露脊鲸(Eubalaena glacialis)出生事件中观察到的行为一致。在整个事件过程中,该区域没有其他南露脊鲸出现。根据南非的观鲸许可条件,没有人试图接近或跟踪这对鲸鱼,因此观察到此结束。仅有少数其他须鲸的分娩事件被描述过,包括北大西洋露脊鲸在美国沿海水域的两次分娩(Foley 等人,2011 年;Zani 等人,2008 年)、座头鲸的一次分娩(Foley 等人,2011 年;Zani 等人,2008 年)、北大西洋露脊鲸的一次分娩(Foley 等人,2011 年;Zani 等人,2008 年)、2008)、马达加斯加圣玛丽岛的座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)(Faria,2013)、毛伊岛拉海纳(Patton &amp; Lawless,2021)、夏威夷(Silvers 等人,1997)和巴西东北海岸(Ferreira 等人,2011)、2011)、墨西哥一头灰鲸(Eschrichtius robustus)的出生(Mills &amp; Mills, 1979)以及在阿根廷巴尔德斯半岛(Península Valdés)不成功的SRW出生(Sironi等人,2019)。总体而言,此处描述的分娩过程中的母性行为与其它鲸目动物成功分娩时的行为类似,可能包括惊跳(Zani 等人,2008 年)、拱背姿势(例如 Weilgart &amp; Whitehead, 1986 年)、摇摆和尾部痉挛(例如 Leatherwood &amp; Beach, 1975 年)以及旋转(Stacey &amp; Baird, 1997 年)。与其他一些须鲸分娩事件(如 Ferreira 等人,2011 年;Zani 等人,2008 年)的记录不同,但并非所有须鲸分娩事件(见 Foley 等人,2011 年;Ransom 等人,2022 年)的记录。虽然很难确定分娩何时真正开始,但工作人员确定为分娩事件的行为时间很短(2 分钟),这可能解释了为什么这些分娩事件很少被观察和记录(Ransom 等人,2022 年)。因此,我们强调在收集鲸目动物的行为和生态信息时,机会性数据的价值。尤其是在观察到不寻常行为时,通过详细描述和照片证据进行记录对我们提高对鲸目动物行为和生态学各方面的理解至关重要。对这一事件的记录扩大了我们对石龙子鲸出生时某些行为方面的了解,但仍有许多未知因素,如分娩时间长短、哺乳开始时间等。正如 Patton &amp; Lawless(2021 年)所展示的那样,空中和水下录像对我们进一步了解这些事件特别有用。Ash Appleby:数据整理;资源;验证;写作--审查和编辑。罗宾-阿普尔比数据整理;资源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First direct observation of a successful southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) birth in South African coastal waters

First direct observation of a successful southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) birth in South African coastal waters

Southern right whale females (Eubalaena australis, hereafter SRWs) usually migrate between higher latitudes where they forage in summer to coastal areas at lower latitudes where they give birth and nurse their young in winter (Best, 2000). In South Africa, the SRW calving season extends between late June to late October, with a birthing peak in August (Best, 1994). This predictable coastal presence has enabled population monitoring since the late 1960s by means of annual aerial surveys (e.g., Best, 1990; Best et al., 2001). In addition to monitoring population recovery postwhaling, these long-term surveys have also allowed for the observational assessment of reproductive parameters. As such, the age at first parturition in the population was estimated at 8 years with an average calving interval of 3 years and an estimated gestation length of 12–13 months (Best, 1994; Best et al., 2001). However, despite these long-term research efforts, very little is known regarding the actual birthing event in SRWs (Best, 1994). Three accounts of possible SRW births off the coast of South Africa have briefly been discussed in Best (1970) and Best (1981) but they all relate to anecdotal evidence from distant shore-based observations.

Documentation of SRW births is equally rare across calving grounds throughout the southern hemisphere. In 2012, an unsuccessful birth was documented in Argentina (Península Valdés) from a whale watching vessel and reported in Sironi et al. (2019). The authors suggested that there were a few possible factors indicating that this was an abnormal parturition including the repeated protrusion and withdrawal of the calf, lengthy time-period before full expulsion of the calf, and resighting of the female without a calf (Sironi et al., 2019). However, despite the increasing boat-based presence around SRWs, mostly in the form of whale-based tourism, close and detailed observation of a successful birth has, to our knowledge, never been directly observed and documented. Therefore, here we report the first documented successful SRW birth observed along the South African coast, supplemented with photographic evidence.

In early July 2022, the commercial whale-watching boat Miroshca (length: 18 m; engine specifications: two John Deere 9 L inboard engines) of the whale-watching company Southern Right Charters encountered a lone SRW in Walker Bay, Hermanus, South Africa. For three to four consecutive days, what appeared to be the same animal was observed in approximately the same location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E) performing short but steep fluking dives. As this type of behavior is typically enjoyed by tourists and rare to see repetitively, the vessel deliberately headed to the same coordinates during each trip considering the high likelihood of such an exciting encounter. Based on the near unchanging location (as indicated by the tracks and coordinates on the skipper's GPS) and unchanged behavior of the animal, it was presumed that it was the same animal being observed each day. However, this could not be verified with photo-identification data.

When the same location was approached on July 5, 2022, around 16:35, there were no whales in sight. Nevertheless, the vessel approached the area slowly as a precaution based on the encounters of the previous days. This approach was halted when a whale lunged out of the water ahead of the boat at approximately 300 m at 16:39. Considering the location (near 34°26.57′S, 19°15.40′E; depth: 41 m; sea surface temperature [SST]: approximately 14°C) it was believed that this was the same individual that had been seen the previous few days. Due to this behavior, a crew member began to take photographs (using a Nikon D3300 with an AF-S NIKKOR 200–500 mm 5.6E ED lens). During the lunge, the whale made a barrel roll movement turning onto her back and vigorously pushing her genital area upward. At that time, a small fluke could be seen protruding from her genital slit and the water around the whale turned red presumably with blood (Figure 1a taken at 16:39). Other displayed behavior included arching (Weilgart & Whitehead, 1986), lurching (Leatherwood & Beach, 1975), rotating (Stacey & Baird, 1997), and thrashing (Zani et al., 2008). Mere seconds later, the calf was expelled from the female's body, its head seen above the water. The head showed the beginnings of a callosity pattern forming but completely lacked any cyamid coverage (Figure 1b taken at 16:41). Fetal folds along the lateral side of the body and a “curly” tail characteristic of newborn cetaceans (Faria, 2013; Zani et al., 2008) could also be observed. Soon after expulsion, the bleeding decreased substantially, and photographs taken at 16:42 no longer had signs of blood in the water. No placental material was observed in the surrounding water immediately following the birth.

The mother did not appear to assist the calf in any way to surface or swim immediately postexpulsion. In fact, immediately after birth, both the mother and newborn calf swam on without signs of physical contact. This is consistent with behavior observed during a North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) birth event reported by Foley et al. (2011). There were no other SRWs present in the area during the entire event. As no attempts were made to approach or follow the pair in accordance with whale watching permit conditions in South Africa, this ended the observation.

Only a few other birthing events have been described for baleen whales, including two births of North Atlantic right whales in the coastal waters of the United States (Foley et al., 2011; Zani et al., 2008), a humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) at Sainte Marie Island, Madagascar (Faria, 2013), in Lahaina, Maui (Patton & Lawless, 2021), in Hawaii, (Silvers et al., 1997) and on the northeast coast Brazil (Ferreira et al., 2011), the birth of a gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) in Mexico (Mills & Mills, 1979) and the unsuccessful SRW birth at Península Valdés, Argentina (Sironi et al., 2019). In general, the maternal behavior during the parturition described here is similar to the behavior observed in other successful cetacean births, which may include thrashing (Zani et al., 2008), arched back positions (e.g., Weilgart & Whitehead, 1986), lurching and tail spasms (e.g., Leatherwood & Beach, 1975), and rotating (Stacey & Baird, 1997). No maternal assistance for calf surfacing immediately after birth was observed, as opposed to what has been documented in some other baleen whale birthing events (e.g., Ferreira et al., 2011; Zani et al., 2008), but not in all (see Foley et al., 2011; Ransom et al., 2022). Although it is difficult to determine when labor truly began, the behavior identified by the crew as a parturition event was short (<2 min) possibly explaining why these birthing events are so rare to observe and document (Ransom et al., 2022). We therefore highlight the value of opportunistic data when collecting information on the behavior and ecology of cetaceans. Especially when unusual behaviors are observed, documentation through detailed description and photographic evidence is crucial in our bid to improve our understanding of various aspects of cetacean behavior and ecology. The documentation of this event has expanded our knowledge of some behavioral aspects of a SRW birth, yet there is still much that remains unknown such as, length of labor, initiation of lactation, etc. Aerial and underwater footage could be particularly useful to further our understanding of these events as is shown by Patton & Lawless (2021).

Loraine Shuttleworth and Els Vermeulen: Investigation; writing and editing. Ash Appleby: Data curation; resources; validation; writing – review and editing. Robin Appleby: Data curation; resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信