体育教学中的评分策略

Q4 Social Sciences
Casey Hollibaugh
{"title":"体育教学中的评分策略","authors":"Casey Hollibaugh","doi":"10.1080/08924562.2023.2238303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractCurrent grade calculations are comprised of managerial factors like dressing out and participation. While well intentioned, these practices are often inequitable and misrepresent the learning occurring in physical education classrooms. This article gives six challenges and examples for grading more equitably in physical education. Consideration for barriers and realities of the practical setting were given regarding grading ideas. Discussion focuses on using formative assessments for feedback and summative assessments to inform grading. Practical challenges and examples are provided to help physical educators move away from managerial grading styles to a mastery approach. Additional informationNotes on contributorsCasey HollibaughCasey Hollibaugh (caseyihollibaugh@missouristate.edu) is a professor in the Department of Kinesiology at Missouri State University in Springfield, MO.","PeriodicalId":37073,"journal":{"name":"Strategies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grading Strategies in Physical Education\",\"authors\":\"Casey Hollibaugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08924562.2023.2238303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractCurrent grade calculations are comprised of managerial factors like dressing out and participation. While well intentioned, these practices are often inequitable and misrepresent the learning occurring in physical education classrooms. This article gives six challenges and examples for grading more equitably in physical education. Consideration for barriers and realities of the practical setting were given regarding grading ideas. Discussion focuses on using formative assessments for feedback and summative assessments to inform grading. Practical challenges and examples are provided to help physical educators move away from managerial grading styles to a mastery approach. Additional informationNotes on contributorsCasey HollibaughCasey Hollibaugh (caseyihollibaugh@missouristate.edu) is a professor in the Department of Kinesiology at Missouri State University in Springfield, MO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2023.2238303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2023.2238303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目前的成绩计算是由衣着、参与等管理因素构成的。虽然出发点是好的,但这些做法往往是不公平的,并歪曲了体育课堂上的学习情况。本文提出了体育公平评分的六个挑战和实例。在分级思路方面,考虑了实际设置的障碍和现实情况。讨论的重点是使用形成性评估作为反馈,使用总结性评估作为评分依据。提供了实际的挑战和例子,以帮助体育教育者从管理评分风格转向掌握方法。casey Hollibaugh (caseyihollibaugh@missouristate.edu)是密苏里州斯普林菲尔德市密苏里州立大学运动机修系的教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grading Strategies in Physical Education
AbstractCurrent grade calculations are comprised of managerial factors like dressing out and participation. While well intentioned, these practices are often inequitable and misrepresent the learning occurring in physical education classrooms. This article gives six challenges and examples for grading more equitably in physical education. Consideration for barriers and realities of the practical setting were given regarding grading ideas. Discussion focuses on using formative assessments for feedback and summative assessments to inform grading. Practical challenges and examples are provided to help physical educators move away from managerial grading styles to a mastery approach. Additional informationNotes on contributorsCasey HollibaughCasey Hollibaugh (caseyihollibaugh@missouristate.edu) is a professor in the Department of Kinesiology at Missouri State University in Springfield, MO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies
Strategies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信