基于LCA的大气污染控制装置对燃煤电厂气体有机污染物排放的影响

Li Junting, Yang Qing, Peng Ya, Wang Shuo, Xiang Jiatao, Zhang Shihong, Yue Pujie, Meng Lei, Wang Changqing
{"title":"基于LCA的大气污染控制装置对燃煤电厂气体有机污染物排放的影响","authors":"Li Junting, Yang Qing, Peng Ya, Wang Shuo, Xiang Jiatao, Zhang Shihong, Yue Pujie, Meng Lei, Wang Changqing","doi":"10.17352/gje.000087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Air pollutants (e.g., NOx, SO2) emitted from coal-fired power plants in China have been effectively controlled by Air Pollution Control Devices (APCDs) since 1996. However, the gas organic pollutants (typically Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)) have been overlooked for a long time. In this study, based on the life cycle assessment method, the effect of APCDs (mainly Selective Catalytic Removal (SCR), Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP), Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD), and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator (WESP)) on gas organic pollutants (without methane) from three typical coal-fired power plants in China has been evaluated in terms of direct emission removal and indirect emissions. Detecting the gas organic pollutants concentrations at the inlet and outlet of APCDs in these three cases, it is found that the total direct emission removal efficiency is up to more than 71.97%, with SCR’s contribution being the highest. However, the manufacture and equipping of APCDs will lead to indirect emission of gas organic pollutants. The result shows that the SCR system is also the main process that induces indirect emissions of gas organic pollutants, associated with the utilization of liquid ammonia and catalyst. Compared to the direct emission of gas organic pollutants, indirect gas organic pollutants emissions can not be ignored. The calculation of net emission removal and the degree of co-effects shows that APCDs can reduce gas organic pollutants, which results in reducing the photochemical ozone creation potential of 1.81E-06~5.93E-06kg(Ethene eq.)/MW·h and human toxicity potential of 2.51E-03~8.06E-03kg (DCB eq.)/MW·h.","PeriodicalId":483336,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of ecology","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of air pollution control devices on gas organic pollutants emission from coal-fired power plants based on LCA\",\"authors\":\"Li Junting, Yang Qing, Peng Ya, Wang Shuo, Xiang Jiatao, Zhang Shihong, Yue Pujie, Meng Lei, Wang Changqing\",\"doi\":\"10.17352/gje.000087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Air pollutants (e.g., NOx, SO2) emitted from coal-fired power plants in China have been effectively controlled by Air Pollution Control Devices (APCDs) since 1996. However, the gas organic pollutants (typically Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)) have been overlooked for a long time. In this study, based on the life cycle assessment method, the effect of APCDs (mainly Selective Catalytic Removal (SCR), Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP), Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD), and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator (WESP)) on gas organic pollutants (without methane) from three typical coal-fired power plants in China has been evaluated in terms of direct emission removal and indirect emissions. Detecting the gas organic pollutants concentrations at the inlet and outlet of APCDs in these three cases, it is found that the total direct emission removal efficiency is up to more than 71.97%, with SCR’s contribution being the highest. However, the manufacture and equipping of APCDs will lead to indirect emission of gas organic pollutants. The result shows that the SCR system is also the main process that induces indirect emissions of gas organic pollutants, associated with the utilization of liquid ammonia and catalyst. Compared to the direct emission of gas organic pollutants, indirect gas organic pollutants emissions can not be ignored. The calculation of net emission removal and the degree of co-effects shows that APCDs can reduce gas organic pollutants, which results in reducing the photochemical ozone creation potential of 1.81E-06~5.93E-06kg(Ethene eq.)/MW·h and human toxicity potential of 2.51E-03~8.06E-03kg (DCB eq.)/MW·h.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal of ecology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal of ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17352/gje.000087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/gje.000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1996年以来,中国通过空气污染控制装置(apcd)对燃煤电厂排放的大气污染物(如NOx、SO2)进行了有效控制。然而,气态有机污染物(主要是挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)和多环芳烃(PAHs))长期以来被人们所忽视。本研究基于生命周期评价方法,从直接排放去除和间接排放两方面评价了中国3个典型燃煤电厂apcd(主要为选择性催化去除(SCR)、电除尘器(ESP)、湿法烟气脱硫(WFGD)和湿法电除尘器(WESP)对气体有机污染物(不含甲烷)的去除效果。检测三种情况下apcd进出口气体有机污染物浓度,发现总直接排放去除效率均达71.97%以上,其中SCR的贡献最大。然而,apcd的制造和装备将导致气体有机污染物的间接排放。结果表明,SCR系统也是引起气态有机污染物间接排放的主要过程,与液氨和催化剂的利用有关。与气体有机污染物的直接排放相比,间接气体有机污染物的排放也不容忽视。净排放去除量和协同效应程度计算表明,apcd可减少气态有机污染物,使光化学臭氧生成电位降低1.81E-06~ 5.993 e -06kg(乙烯当量)/MW·h,人体毒性电位降低2.51E-03~8.06E-03kg (DCB当量)/MW·h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of air pollution control devices on gas organic pollutants emission from coal-fired power plants based on LCA
Air pollutants (e.g., NOx, SO2) emitted from coal-fired power plants in China have been effectively controlled by Air Pollution Control Devices (APCDs) since 1996. However, the gas organic pollutants (typically Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)) have been overlooked for a long time. In this study, based on the life cycle assessment method, the effect of APCDs (mainly Selective Catalytic Removal (SCR), Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP), Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD), and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator (WESP)) on gas organic pollutants (without methane) from three typical coal-fired power plants in China has been evaluated in terms of direct emission removal and indirect emissions. Detecting the gas organic pollutants concentrations at the inlet and outlet of APCDs in these three cases, it is found that the total direct emission removal efficiency is up to more than 71.97%, with SCR’s contribution being the highest. However, the manufacture and equipping of APCDs will lead to indirect emission of gas organic pollutants. The result shows that the SCR system is also the main process that induces indirect emissions of gas organic pollutants, associated with the utilization of liquid ammonia and catalyst. Compared to the direct emission of gas organic pollutants, indirect gas organic pollutants emissions can not be ignored. The calculation of net emission removal and the degree of co-effects shows that APCDs can reduce gas organic pollutants, which results in reducing the photochemical ozone creation potential of 1.81E-06~5.93E-06kg(Ethene eq.)/MW·h and human toxicity potential of 2.51E-03~8.06E-03kg (DCB eq.)/MW·h.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信