基于修订的Bloom分类的英语学生工作表阅读问题分类

Christian Rispande Siregar, Ade Aini Nuran
{"title":"基于修订的Bloom分类的英语学生工作表阅读问题分类","authors":"Christian Rispande Siregar, Ade Aini Nuran","doi":"10.24114/tj.v12i3.51659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading as one of the crucial skill in English language usually hard to comprehend by the students. To achieve the reading comprehension, teacher has to provide the equipment to measure the students understanding. Worksheet as the appropriate equipment to measure students understanding, generally using the LOTS level of questions rather than HOTS level of questions. In fact, the LOTS level of questions cannot increase the students’ comprehension critically. Worksheet should be selected by the appropriate level of reading questions. It can be analyzed by using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study aims to find out; (1) the level of reading questions taxonomy in English student’s worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, (2) the distribution level of question’s taxonomy in English students worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The descriptive qualitative research design with research instruments in the form of document analysis and checklist was employed in this research. The research implied the dominant level of questions is remembering level with 35 items out of 58 questions (60.34%). Followed by understanding (20.68%), creating (10.34%), analyzing (3.44%), evaluating (3.44%) and applying (1.72%)","PeriodicalId":472959,"journal":{"name":"TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning","volume":"153 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Questions Taxonomy in English Student’s Worksheet Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Christian Rispande Siregar, Ade Aini Nuran\",\"doi\":\"10.24114/tj.v12i3.51659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reading as one of the crucial skill in English language usually hard to comprehend by the students. To achieve the reading comprehension, teacher has to provide the equipment to measure the students understanding. Worksheet as the appropriate equipment to measure students understanding, generally using the LOTS level of questions rather than HOTS level of questions. In fact, the LOTS level of questions cannot increase the students’ comprehension critically. Worksheet should be selected by the appropriate level of reading questions. It can be analyzed by using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study aims to find out; (1) the level of reading questions taxonomy in English student’s worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, (2) the distribution level of question’s taxonomy in English students worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The descriptive qualitative research design with research instruments in the form of document analysis and checklist was employed in this research. The research implied the dominant level of questions is remembering level with 35 items out of 58 questions (60.34%). Followed by understanding (20.68%), creating (10.34%), analyzing (3.44%), evaluating (3.44%) and applying (1.72%)\",\"PeriodicalId\":472959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"153 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24114/tj.v12i3.51659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/tj.v12i3.51659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阅读作为学习英语的一项重要技能,通常很难被学生理解。为了达到阅读理解的目的,教师必须提供测量学生理解能力的设备。工作表作为衡量学生理解程度的适当工具,一般使用LOTS级别的问题而不是HOTS级别的问题。事实上,lot水平的问题并不能提高学生的批判性理解能力。工作表应按阅读题的适当水平选择。它可以通过使用修订的布鲁姆分类法进行分析。本研究旨在找出;(1)基于修订Bloom 's分类法的英语学生工作表中阅读问题分类水平;(2)基于修订Bloom 's分类法的英语学生工作表中问题分类的分布水平。本研究采用描述性质的研究设计,研究工具为文献分析法和检查表法。研究表明,在58个问题中,有35个(60.34%)问题的主导水平是记忆水平。其次是理解(20.68%)、创造(10.34%)、分析(3.44%)、评价(3.44%)和应用(1.72%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Questions Taxonomy in English Student’s Worksheet Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Reading as one of the crucial skill in English language usually hard to comprehend by the students. To achieve the reading comprehension, teacher has to provide the equipment to measure the students understanding. Worksheet as the appropriate equipment to measure students understanding, generally using the LOTS level of questions rather than HOTS level of questions. In fact, the LOTS level of questions cannot increase the students’ comprehension critically. Worksheet should be selected by the appropriate level of reading questions. It can be analyzed by using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study aims to find out; (1) the level of reading questions taxonomy in English student’s worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, (2) the distribution level of question’s taxonomy in English students worksheet based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The descriptive qualitative research design with research instruments in the form of document analysis and checklist was employed in this research. The research implied the dominant level of questions is remembering level with 35 items out of 58 questions (60.34%). Followed by understanding (20.68%), creating (10.34%), analyzing (3.44%), evaluating (3.44%) and applying (1.72%)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信