国际疾病分类第9次修订眼科肿瘤诊断识别代码的预测价值

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kenny Y. Wang, Timothy T. Xu, Launia J. White, Lauren A. Dalvin
{"title":"国际疾病分类第9次修订眼科肿瘤诊断识别代码的预测价值","authors":"Kenny Y. Wang, Timothy T. Xu, Launia J. White, Lauren A. Dalvin","doi":"10.1159/000534688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To determine the predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) billing codes for identifying ocular oncology diagnoses. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with any ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code from January 1, 2006 to October 1, 2015. All medical records were reviewed for confirmation of ocular neoplasm. Diagnoses with ≥5 cases confirmed via medical record review were compared to corresponding ICD-9 codes. Main outcome measures included positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of ICD-9 codes. Results: Among 3,932 subjects with ≥1 ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code, 21 diagnoses met study criteria. The most frequent intraocular, extraocular/orbital, and ocular surface diagnoses were choroidal nevus (n=824), epidermal inclusion cyst (n=263), and conjunctival nevus (n=74), respectively. PPVs ranged from 1.2% to 73.8%, NPVs from 96.9% to 100%, sensitivity from 0% to 100%, and specificity from 85.7% to 100%. Among malignant neoplasms, PPV ranged from 0% to 73.8%: ocular surface squamous neoplasia (PPV: 0%), choroidal melanoma (PPV: 25.0%), eyelid squamous cell carcinoma (PPV: 46.7%), and eyelid basal cell carcinoma (PPV: 73.8%). Among benign neoplasms, PPV ranged from 1.2% (dermoid cyst) to 61.6% (choroidal nevus). Conclusion: There was wide variation in predictive value of ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 billing codes, which suggests that ocular oncology-related claims data alone may overestimate the true number of ocular oncology diagnoses.","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Codes for Identifying Ocular Oncology Diagnoses\",\"authors\":\"Kenny Y. Wang, Timothy T. Xu, Launia J. White, Lauren A. Dalvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: To determine the predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) billing codes for identifying ocular oncology diagnoses. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with any ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code from January 1, 2006 to October 1, 2015. All medical records were reviewed for confirmation of ocular neoplasm. Diagnoses with ≥5 cases confirmed via medical record review were compared to corresponding ICD-9 codes. Main outcome measures included positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of ICD-9 codes. Results: Among 3,932 subjects with ≥1 ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code, 21 diagnoses met study criteria. The most frequent intraocular, extraocular/orbital, and ocular surface diagnoses were choroidal nevus (n=824), epidermal inclusion cyst (n=263), and conjunctival nevus (n=74), respectively. PPVs ranged from 1.2% to 73.8%, NPVs from 96.9% to 100%, sensitivity from 0% to 100%, and specificity from 85.7% to 100%. Among malignant neoplasms, PPV ranged from 0% to 73.8%: ocular surface squamous neoplasia (PPV: 0%), choroidal melanoma (PPV: 25.0%), eyelid squamous cell carcinoma (PPV: 46.7%), and eyelid basal cell carcinoma (PPV: 73.8%). Among benign neoplasms, PPV ranged from 1.2% (dermoid cyst) to 61.6% (choroidal nevus). Conclusion: There was wide variation in predictive value of ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 billing codes, which suggests that ocular oncology-related claims data alone may overestimate the true number of ocular oncology diagnoses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:确定国际疾病分类第9版(ICD-9)计费码对识别眼部肿瘤诊断的预测价值。方法:对2006年1月1日至2015年10月1日期间患有眼部肿瘤相关ICD-9编码的明尼苏达州奥姆斯特德县所有居民进行基于人群的回顾性队列研究。检查了所有的医疗记录以确认眼部肿瘤。将病历复核确诊病例≥5例与相应的ICD-9编码进行比较。主要结局指标包括阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、ICD-9编码的敏感性和特异性。结果:在3932例眼部肿瘤相关ICD-9编码≥1例的受试者中,有21例诊断符合研究标准。最常见的眼内、眼外/眶和眼表诊断分别是脉络膜痣(824例)、表皮包膜囊肿(263例)和结膜痣(74例)。ppv范围为1.2% ~ 73.8%,npv范围为96.9% ~ 100%,敏感性范围为0% ~ 100%,特异性范围为85.7% ~ 100%。在恶性肿瘤中,PPV的范围从0%到73.8%:眼表鳞状瘤变(PPV: 0%)、脉膜黑色素瘤(PPV: 25.0%)、眼睑鳞状细胞癌(PPV: 46.7%)和眼睑基底细胞癌(PPV: 73.8%)。在良性肿瘤中,PPV从1.2%(皮样囊肿)到61.6%(脉络膜痣)不等。结论:眼科肿瘤相关ICD-9计费代码的预测价值存在较大差异,这表明单独的眼科肿瘤相关索赔数据可能高估了眼科肿瘤诊断的真实数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Value of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Codes for Identifying Ocular Oncology Diagnoses
Introduction: To determine the predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) billing codes for identifying ocular oncology diagnoses. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with any ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code from January 1, 2006 to October 1, 2015. All medical records were reviewed for confirmation of ocular neoplasm. Diagnoses with ≥5 cases confirmed via medical record review were compared to corresponding ICD-9 codes. Main outcome measures included positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of ICD-9 codes. Results: Among 3,932 subjects with ≥1 ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 code, 21 diagnoses met study criteria. The most frequent intraocular, extraocular/orbital, and ocular surface diagnoses were choroidal nevus (n=824), epidermal inclusion cyst (n=263), and conjunctival nevus (n=74), respectively. PPVs ranged from 1.2% to 73.8%, NPVs from 96.9% to 100%, sensitivity from 0% to 100%, and specificity from 85.7% to 100%. Among malignant neoplasms, PPV ranged from 0% to 73.8%: ocular surface squamous neoplasia (PPV: 0%), choroidal melanoma (PPV: 25.0%), eyelid squamous cell carcinoma (PPV: 46.7%), and eyelid basal cell carcinoma (PPV: 73.8%). Among benign neoplasms, PPV ranged from 1.2% (dermoid cyst) to 61.6% (choroidal nevus). Conclusion: There was wide variation in predictive value of ocular neoplasm-related ICD-9 billing codes, which suggests that ocular oncology-related claims data alone may overestimate the true number of ocular oncology diagnoses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信