{"title":"presst诉Petrodel案后英国揭开公司面纱的司法途径","authors":"Farqaleet Khokhar","doi":"10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.2.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of the evasion principle by Lord Sumption in Petrodel v Prest is critically inspected and investigated to highlight how the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil has been applied by the English Courts. To this end, it is pinpointed that the scope of the doctrine has been narrowed, and the courts frequently misinterpreted the evasion principle, as evinced by the recent case Akhemodova v Akhemdov and Wood v Baker","PeriodicalId":116159,"journal":{"name":"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English Judicial Approach towards Piercing the Corporate Veil after Prest v Petrodel\",\"authors\":\"Farqaleet Khokhar\",\"doi\":\"10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.2.0065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of the evasion principle by Lord Sumption in Petrodel v Prest is critically inspected and investigated to highlight how the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil has been applied by the English Courts. To this end, it is pinpointed that the scope of the doctrine has been narrowed, and the courts frequently misinterpreted the evasion principle, as evinced by the recent case Akhemodova v Akhemdov and Wood v Baker\",\"PeriodicalId\":116159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.2.0065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.2.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Petrodel v Prest案中，Sumption勋爵对逃避原则的应用进行了严格的审查和调查，以突出戳穿公司面纱的原则是如何被英国法院应用的。为此目的，可以明确指出，该原则的范围被缩小了，法院经常误解逃避原则，最近的Akhemodova诉Akhemdov案和Wood诉Baker案就证明了这一点
English Judicial Approach towards Piercing the Corporate Veil after Prest v Petrodel
The application of the evasion principle by Lord Sumption in Petrodel v Prest is critically inspected and investigated to highlight how the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil has been applied by the English Courts. To this end, it is pinpointed that the scope of the doctrine has been narrowed, and the courts frequently misinterpreted the evasion principle, as evinced by the recent case Akhemodova v Akhemdov and Wood v Baker
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
