{"title":"可观测物的纠缠:量子条件概率方法","authors":"Andrei Khrennikov, Irina Basieva","doi":"10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is devoted to clarification of the notion of entanglement through decoupling it from the tensor product structure and treating as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observable <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>. In our framework, it is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>, so this is <i>AB</i>-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilistic definition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the <i>AB</i>-entangled states as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor product case, <i>AB</i>-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vise verse. <i>AB</i>-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation, i.e., <span>\\(\\langle AB\\rangle _{\\psi} \\not = \\langle A\\rangle _{\\psi} \\langle B\\rangle _{\\psi} .\\)</span> We describe the class of quantum states that are <span>\\(A_{u} B_{u}\\)</span>-entangled for a family of unitary operators (<i>u</i>). Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":569,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Physics","volume":"53 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entanglement of Observables: Quantum Conditional Probability Approach\",\"authors\":\"Andrei Khrennikov, Irina Basieva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is devoted to clarification of the notion of entanglement through decoupling it from the tensor product structure and treating as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observable <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>. In our framework, it is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>, so this is <i>AB</i>-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilistic definition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the <i>AB</i>-entangled states as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor product case, <i>AB</i>-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vise verse. <i>AB</i>-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation, i.e., <span>\\\\(\\\\langle AB\\\\rangle _{\\\\psi} \\\\not = \\\\langle A\\\\rangle _{\\\\psi} \\\\langle B\\\\rangle _{\\\\psi} .\\\\)</span> We describe the class of quantum states that are <span>\\\\(A_{u} B_{u}\\\\)</span>-entangled for a family of unitary operators (<i>u</i>). Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations of Physics\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Entanglement of Observables: Quantum Conditional Probability Approach
This paper is devoted to clarification of the notion of entanglement through decoupling it from the tensor product structure and treating as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observable A and B. In our framework, it is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so this is AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilistic definition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the AB-entangled states as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor product case, AB-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vise verse. AB-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation, i.e., \(\langle AB\rangle _{\psi} \not = \langle A\rangle _{\psi} \langle B\rangle _{\psi} .\) We describe the class of quantum states that are \(A_{u} B_{u}\)-entangled for a family of unitary operators (u). Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.
期刊介绍:
The conceptual foundations of physics have been under constant revision from the outset, and remain so today. Discussion of foundational issues has always been a major source of progress in science, on a par with empirical knowledge and mathematics. Examples include the debates on the nature of space and time involving Newton and later Einstein; on the nature of heat and of energy; on irreversibility and probability due to Boltzmann; on the nature of matter and observation measurement during the early days of quantum theory; on the meaning of renormalisation, and many others.
Today, insightful reflection on the conceptual structure utilised in our efforts to understand the physical world is of particular value, given the serious unsolved problems that are likely to demand, once again, modifications of the grammar of our scientific description of the physical world. The quantum properties of gravity, the nature of measurement in quantum mechanics, the primary source of irreversibility, the role of information in physics – all these are examples of questions about which science is still confused and whose solution may well demand more than skilled mathematics and new experiments.
Foundations of Physics is a privileged forum for discussing such foundational issues, open to physicists, cosmologists, philosophers and mathematicians. It is devoted to the conceptual bases of the fundamental theories of physics and cosmology, to their logical, methodological, and philosophical premises.
The journal welcomes papers on issues such as the foundations of special and general relativity, quantum theory, classical and quantum field theory, quantum gravity, unified theories, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, cosmology, and similar.