Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Nesar Ghadernezhad, Justyna Wolinska
{"title":"聚苯乙烯纳米塑料对欧洲水蚤的潜在高毒性","authors":"Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Nesar Ghadernezhad, Justyna Wolinska","doi":"10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current regulatory discussions about microplastics are often questioned based on a lack of data indicating high ecotoxic hazards of these particles within standard and recognized definitions. Moreover, there is scientific debate on what metrics to report the micro-nanoplastics toxicity (i.e. mass or particle counts-based exposure). We present here the high potential sensitivity of three genotypically different clones of the European <i>Daphnia longispina</i> species complex exposed to non-functionalized polystyrene nanobeads of 50 nm and 100 nm in diameter according to adapted OECD 202 test protocol.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>EC<sub>50</sub>s <sub>48 h</sub> varied from 0.2 to 8.9 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 2.49 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for 50 nm beads, and from 32.7 to 90.3 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 59.39 mg L<sup>−</sup>1) for the 100 nm. EC<sub>10</sub>s <sub>48 h</sub> varied from 0.0007 to 7.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 0.28 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for 50 nm beads, and from 25.5 to 69.1 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 47.51 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for the 100 nm. Inter-clonal variability was about tenfold. Therefore, several 1000 s-fold variations in mass-based ecotoxicity for these polystyrene beads was observed if particle size and <i>Daphnia</i> genotype are considered jointly.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Such ecotoxicity potential is comparable to highly toxic chemicals in global and EU-based regulatory classification and labelling. Ecotoxicity based on particle counts suggested convergence of EC50s, with effects generally observed around 10<sup>11</sup> to10<sup>15</sup> particles L<sup>−1</sup>. The present results highlight the potential high hazard of these particles and the relevance of particle size and exposure metrics on hazard conclusion.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n <div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54293,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://enveurope.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential for high toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics to the European Daphnia longispina\",\"authors\":\"Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Nesar Ghadernezhad, Justyna Wolinska\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current regulatory discussions about microplastics are often questioned based on a lack of data indicating high ecotoxic hazards of these particles within standard and recognized definitions. Moreover, there is scientific debate on what metrics to report the micro-nanoplastics toxicity (i.e. mass or particle counts-based exposure). We present here the high potential sensitivity of three genotypically different clones of the European <i>Daphnia longispina</i> species complex exposed to non-functionalized polystyrene nanobeads of 50 nm and 100 nm in diameter according to adapted OECD 202 test protocol.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>EC<sub>50</sub>s <sub>48 h</sub> varied from 0.2 to 8.9 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 2.49 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for 50 nm beads, and from 32.7 to 90.3 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 59.39 mg L<sup>−</sup>1) for the 100 nm. EC<sub>10</sub>s <sub>48 h</sub> varied from 0.0007 to 7.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 0.28 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for 50 nm beads, and from 25.5 to 69.1 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (mean 47.51 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) for the 100 nm. Inter-clonal variability was about tenfold. Therefore, several 1000 s-fold variations in mass-based ecotoxicity for these polystyrene beads was observed if particle size and <i>Daphnia</i> genotype are considered jointly.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Such ecotoxicity potential is comparable to highly toxic chemicals in global and EU-based regulatory classification and labelling. Ecotoxicity based on particle counts suggested convergence of EC50s, with effects generally observed around 10<sup>11</sup> to10<sup>15</sup> particles L<sup>−1</sup>. The present results highlight the potential high hazard of these particles and the relevance of particle size and exposure metrics on hazard conclusion.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n <div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://enveurope.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-023-00763-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potential for high toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics to the European Daphnia longispina
Background
Current regulatory discussions about microplastics are often questioned based on a lack of data indicating high ecotoxic hazards of these particles within standard and recognized definitions. Moreover, there is scientific debate on what metrics to report the micro-nanoplastics toxicity (i.e. mass or particle counts-based exposure). We present here the high potential sensitivity of three genotypically different clones of the European Daphnia longispina species complex exposed to non-functionalized polystyrene nanobeads of 50 nm and 100 nm in diameter according to adapted OECD 202 test protocol.
Results
EC50s 48 h varied from 0.2 to 8.9 mg L−1 (mean 2.49 mg L−1) for 50 nm beads, and from 32.7 to 90.3 mg L−1 (mean 59.39 mg L−1) for the 100 nm. EC10s 48 h varied from 0.0007 to 7.5 mg L−1 (mean 0.28 mg L−1) for 50 nm beads, and from 25.5 to 69.1 mg L−1 (mean 47.51 mg L−1) for the 100 nm. Inter-clonal variability was about tenfold. Therefore, several 1000 s-fold variations in mass-based ecotoxicity for these polystyrene beads was observed if particle size and Daphnia genotype are considered jointly.
Conclusions
Such ecotoxicity potential is comparable to highly toxic chemicals in global and EU-based regulatory classification and labelling. Ecotoxicity based on particle counts suggested convergence of EC50s, with effects generally observed around 1011 to1015 particles L−1. The present results highlight the potential high hazard of these particles and the relevance of particle size and exposure metrics on hazard conclusion.
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.