以自然为基础的河流廊道解决方案

IF 3.3 2区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Matthew L. Chambers , Charles B. van Rees , Brian P. Bledsoe , David Crane , Susana Ferreira , Damon M. Hall , Rod W. Lammers , Craig E. Landry , Donald R. Nelson , Matt Shudtz , Burton C. Suedel
{"title":"以自然为基础的河流廊道解决方案","authors":"Matthew L. Chambers ,&nbsp;Charles B. van Rees ,&nbsp;Brian P. Bledsoe ,&nbsp;David Crane ,&nbsp;Susana Ferreira ,&nbsp;Damon M. Hall ,&nbsp;Rod W. Lammers ,&nbsp;Craig E. Landry ,&nbsp;Donald R. Nelson ,&nbsp;Matt Shudtz ,&nbsp;Burton C. Suedel","doi":"10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The conceptual framework for nature-based solutions (NbS) is well developed, however realizing the potential of NbS at scale and in widespread professional practice in infrastructure systems depends on overcoming operational challenges rooted in the historical policies and engineering practices of the action agencies capable of implementation. In this article, we explore levee setbacks as a NbS for improving the sustainability of leveed river corridors within the context of the United States (US) and its primary action agency of flood risk management, the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). By identifying the social and environmental consequences of historical levee management and linking these consequences with historical policies and engineering practices, we highlight knowledge gaps, challenges and opportunities for progress with NbS. We also briefly discuss USACE’s decision-making processes for infrastructure investments and the valuation of ecosystem services as it pertains to operationalizing setbacks in practice. We then develop a case study of a recent setback on the Missouri River to showcase how USACE overcame implementation challenges. Lessons from past levee corridor management in the US, and USACE’s current corrective actions, may help foster understanding of how to overcome operational challenges in the implementation of setbacks in other social and political contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56021,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature-based solutions for leveed river corridors\",\"authors\":\"Matthew L. Chambers ,&nbsp;Charles B. van Rees ,&nbsp;Brian P. Bledsoe ,&nbsp;David Crane ,&nbsp;Susana Ferreira ,&nbsp;Damon M. Hall ,&nbsp;Rod W. Lammers ,&nbsp;Craig E. Landry ,&nbsp;Donald R. Nelson ,&nbsp;Matt Shudtz ,&nbsp;Burton C. Suedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The conceptual framework for nature-based solutions (NbS) is well developed, however realizing the potential of NbS at scale and in widespread professional practice in infrastructure systems depends on overcoming operational challenges rooted in the historical policies and engineering practices of the action agencies capable of implementation. In this article, we explore levee setbacks as a NbS for improving the sustainability of leveed river corridors within the context of the United States (US) and its primary action agency of flood risk management, the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). By identifying the social and environmental consequences of historical levee management and linking these consequences with historical policies and engineering practices, we highlight knowledge gaps, challenges and opportunities for progress with NbS. We also briefly discuss USACE’s decision-making processes for infrastructure investments and the valuation of ecosystem services as it pertains to operationalizing setbacks in practice. We then develop a case study of a recent setback on the Missouri River to showcase how USACE overcame implementation challenges. Lessons from past levee corridor management in the US, and USACE’s current corrective actions, may help foster understanding of how to overcome operational challenges in the implementation of setbacks in other social and political contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropocene\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305423000504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305423000504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于自然的解决方案(NbS)的概念框架已经得到了很好的发展,然而,在基础设施系统的大规模和广泛的专业实践中实现NbS的潜力,取决于克服植根于历史政策和有能力实施的行动机构的工程实践的运营挑战。在本文中,我们以美国及其洪水风险管理的主要行动机构——陆军工程兵团(USACE)为背景,探讨堤防退坡作为一种NbS,以提高堤防河流走廊的可持续性。通过识别历史堤坝管理的社会和环境后果,并将这些后果与历史政策和工程实践联系起来,我们强调了与NbS合作的知识差距、挑战和机遇。我们还简要讨论了USACE在基础设施投资和生态系统服务评估方面的决策过程,因为它与实践中的操作挫折有关。然后,我们对密苏里河上最近的一次挫折进行了案例研究,以展示USACE如何克服实施挑战。从美国过去堤坝走廊管理的经验教训,以及USACE目前的纠正措施,可能有助于促进对如何克服在其他社会和政治背景下实施挫折的操作挑战的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature-based solutions for leveed river corridors

The conceptual framework for nature-based solutions (NbS) is well developed, however realizing the potential of NbS at scale and in widespread professional practice in infrastructure systems depends on overcoming operational challenges rooted in the historical policies and engineering practices of the action agencies capable of implementation. In this article, we explore levee setbacks as a NbS for improving the sustainability of leveed river corridors within the context of the United States (US) and its primary action agency of flood risk management, the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). By identifying the social and environmental consequences of historical levee management and linking these consequences with historical policies and engineering practices, we highlight knowledge gaps, challenges and opportunities for progress with NbS. We also briefly discuss USACE’s decision-making processes for infrastructure investments and the valuation of ecosystem services as it pertains to operationalizing setbacks in practice. We then develop a case study of a recent setback on the Missouri River to showcase how USACE overcame implementation challenges. Lessons from past levee corridor management in the US, and USACE’s current corrective actions, may help foster understanding of how to overcome operational challenges in the implementation of setbacks in other social and political contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropocene
Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
102 days
期刊介绍: Anthropocene is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed works addressing the nature, scale, and extent of interactions that people have with Earth processes and systems. The scope of the journal includes the significance of human activities in altering Earth’s landscapes, oceans, the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems over a range of time and space scales - from global phenomena over geologic eras to single isolated events - including the linkages, couplings, and feedbacks among physical, chemical, and biological components of Earth systems. The journal also addresses how such alterations can have profound effects on, and implications for, human society. As the scale and pace of human interactions with Earth systems have intensified in recent decades, understanding human-induced alterations in the past and present is critical to our ability to anticipate, mitigate, and adapt to changes in the future. The journal aims to provide a venue to focus research findings, discussions, and debates toward advancing predictive understanding of human interactions with Earth systems - one of the grand challenges of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信