益生菌治疗抑郁和焦虑的有效性和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价综述

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Claudia Regina de Souza , Raul Edison Luna Lazo , Felipe Mainka, André Gaspar Zinco, Mariana Mengarda, Aline de Fátima Bonetti, Fábio Seigi Murakami
{"title":"益生菌治疗抑郁和焦虑的有效性和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价综述","authors":"Claudia Regina de Souza ,&nbsp;Raul Edison Luna Lazo ,&nbsp;Felipe Mainka,&nbsp;André Gaspar Zinco,&nbsp;Mariana Mengarda,&nbsp;Aline de Fátima Bonetti,&nbsp;Fábio Seigi Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Depression and anxiety have several consequences on human health and are the most prevalent </span>mental disorders<span> in the world. The central nervous system<span><span> is known to be affected by the gut microbiota<span>. Therefore, the consumption of probiotics can act as an alternative for the </span></span>treatment of these disorders.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety through an overview of </span>systematic reviews<span> of randomized clinical trials.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2023. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246244). Efficacy and safety were assessed based on the results of depression and anxiety scale scores, and the adverse events reported. The quality of the studies and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and GRADE pro tools respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one systematic reviews were included. Some studies showed promising results for the use of probiotics in depression treatment. However, the AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that ten studies (47.6%) were rated as \"Moderate,\" four studies (19.0.%) as \"Low,\" and seven studies (33.4%) as \"Critically Low\" in terms of methodological quality. Regarding adverse events, only 5 studies report it. Based on the GRADE pro evaluation the force of recommendation probiotics for depression and anxiety is still strength remains weak.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>More systematic reviews with higher-quality, following meticulously recommended methodological guidelines should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics as intervention in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20049,"journal":{"name":"PharmaNutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of depression and anxiety: An umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Regina de Souza ,&nbsp;Raul Edison Luna Lazo ,&nbsp;Felipe Mainka,&nbsp;André Gaspar Zinco,&nbsp;Mariana Mengarda,&nbsp;Aline de Fátima Bonetti,&nbsp;Fábio Seigi Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Depression and anxiety have several consequences on human health and are the most prevalent </span>mental disorders<span> in the world. The central nervous system<span><span> is known to be affected by the gut microbiota<span>. Therefore, the consumption of probiotics can act as an alternative for the </span></span>treatment of these disorders.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety through an overview of </span>systematic reviews<span> of randomized clinical trials.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2023. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246244). Efficacy and safety were assessed based on the results of depression and anxiety scale scores, and the adverse events reported. The quality of the studies and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and GRADE pro tools respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one systematic reviews were included. Some studies showed promising results for the use of probiotics in depression treatment. However, the AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that ten studies (47.6%) were rated as \\\"Moderate,\\\" four studies (19.0.%) as \\\"Low,\\\" and seven studies (33.4%) as \\\"Critically Low\\\" in terms of methodological quality. Regarding adverse events, only 5 studies report it. Based on the GRADE pro evaluation the force of recommendation probiotics for depression and anxiety is still strength remains weak.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>More systematic reviews with higher-quality, following meticulously recommended methodological guidelines should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics as intervention in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmaNutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmaNutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434423000348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmaNutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434423000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁和焦虑对人类健康有多种影响,是世界上最普遍的精神障碍。众所周知,中枢神经系统会受到肠道菌群的影响。因此,食用益生菌可以作为治疗这些疾病的另一种选择。本综述旨在通过对随机临床试验的系统综述,评估益生菌对抑郁症和焦虑症患者的影响。方法系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库至2023年5月。本综述在PROSPERO注册(CRD42021246244)。根据抑郁和焦虑量表评分结果及不良事件报告评估疗效和安全性。研究的质量和证据的确定性分别使用AMSTAR 2和GRADE pro工具进行评估。结果共纳入21篇系统评价。一些研究显示,使用益生菌治疗抑郁症有很好的结果。然而,AMSTAR 2工具显示,就方法学质量而言,10项研究(47.6%)被评为“中等”,4项研究(19.0%)被评为“低”,7项研究(33.4%)被评为“极低”。关于不良事件,只有5项研究报告了它。基于GRADE亲评价,推荐益生菌治疗抑郁和焦虑的力度仍然较弱。结论在评估益生菌干预抑郁和焦虑患者的疗效和安全性方面,需要更多的系统评价和更高质量的评价,并遵循精心推荐的方法学指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of depression and anxiety: An umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials

Background

Depression and anxiety have several consequences on human health and are the most prevalent mental disorders in the world. The central nervous system is known to be affected by the gut microbiota. Therefore, the consumption of probiotics can act as an alternative for the treatment of these disorders.

Objectives

This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety through an overview of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2023. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246244). Efficacy and safety were assessed based on the results of depression and anxiety scale scores, and the adverse events reported. The quality of the studies and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and GRADE pro tools respectively.

Results

Twenty-one systematic reviews were included. Some studies showed promising results for the use of probiotics in depression treatment. However, the AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that ten studies (47.6%) were rated as "Moderate," four studies (19.0.%) as "Low," and seven studies (33.4%) as "Critically Low" in terms of methodological quality. Regarding adverse events, only 5 studies report it. Based on the GRADE pro evaluation the force of recommendation probiotics for depression and anxiety is still strength remains weak.

Conclusion

More systematic reviews with higher-quality, following meticulously recommended methodological guidelines should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics as intervention in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PharmaNutrition
PharmaNutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信