{"title":"利用分位数损耗将安全系数集成到容量预测模型中","authors":"Gabriela Molinar, J. Gundlach, W. Stork","doi":"10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.","PeriodicalId":120262,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a Safety Factor into Ampacity Forecasting Models using Quantile Losses\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Molinar, J. Gundlach, W. Stork\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America (ISGT Latin America)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTLatinAmerica52371.2021.9543043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating a Safety Factor into Ampacity Forecasting Models using Quantile Losses
The safety and the life span of the electrical network have the highest priority. A safety factor for ampacity predictions is defined by several system operators to avoid overestimations. Applying this, they still have time to react without producing long-term damages of the line in case the forecast is higher than the actual current capacity. An example of a safety factor is the 2% overestimation rate. This article presents and compares two possible solutions to include a safety factor into ampacity forecasting systems. One is a simple bias, which is statistically calculated and then added as a constant to all predictions. The second approach can be applied to machine learning models, since it uses a quantile loss function for training, which has a predefined threshold of overestimations as a quantile. Both solutions are explained using a standard database for ampacity forecasting studies. At the end, the benefits of training based on a quantile loss function get clear, which opens a new experimentation field to get nearer to the requirements of system operators.