基督教圣像学中《圣经》的类型学平行原则——兼论术语问题

I. Sycheva
{"title":"基督教圣像学中《圣经》的类型学平行原则——兼论术语问题","authors":"I. Sycheva","doi":"10.25136/2409-8744.2022.3.38269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The object of research in this article is the terminological apparatus that is being formed in the foreign and russian historiographical tradition, describing concepts related to the principle of typological parallelism of Covenants in Christian iconography. This principle is based on the doctrine of \"Reconciliation of Testaments\" (considering Old Testament events as prototypes of New Testament history) and underlies the organization of plots already in a number of monuments of early Christian art. In the era of the High Middle Ages, this principle became one of the fundamental in the iconography of monuments of painting, sculpture and decorative and applied art. The subject of the study was the process of adding up the generally accepted terminology in studies devoted to the iconographic technique in question. The article also raises the problem of correlation between terms used in foreign and domestic historiography. Based on the analysis of the addition of the terminological apparatus in research on Christian iconography, the article concludes that there is no unified system of terms in modern science, especially in the domestic one, to describe the extremely important and widespread phenomenon of Christian iconography – the reflection in the pictorial cycles of the principle of \"Reconciliation of Covenants\". Tracing the etymology of the concepts used, the author of the article clearly demonstrates the existing contradictions in the terms \"type\", \"antithype\" and \"antithype\", and also analyzes the difficulties that arise when translating these concepts into Russian. Based on this research, it becomes possible to offer the most correct and unambiguously interpreted terms. The relevance of the study is explained by the absence in the Russian research literature of a system of terms for the iconographic principle under consideration, as well as individual Old Testament subjects-prototypes and their New Testament analogies.\n","PeriodicalId":333566,"journal":{"name":"Человек и культура","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Principle of Typological Parallelism of Testaments in Christian Iconography: on the Problem of Terminology\",\"authors\":\"I. Sycheva\",\"doi\":\"10.25136/2409-8744.2022.3.38269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The object of research in this article is the terminological apparatus that is being formed in the foreign and russian historiographical tradition, describing concepts related to the principle of typological parallelism of Covenants in Christian iconography. This principle is based on the doctrine of \\\"Reconciliation of Testaments\\\" (considering Old Testament events as prototypes of New Testament history) and underlies the organization of plots already in a number of monuments of early Christian art. In the era of the High Middle Ages, this principle became one of the fundamental in the iconography of monuments of painting, sculpture and decorative and applied art. The subject of the study was the process of adding up the generally accepted terminology in studies devoted to the iconographic technique in question. The article also raises the problem of correlation between terms used in foreign and domestic historiography. Based on the analysis of the addition of the terminological apparatus in research on Christian iconography, the article concludes that there is no unified system of terms in modern science, especially in the domestic one, to describe the extremely important and widespread phenomenon of Christian iconography – the reflection in the pictorial cycles of the principle of \\\"Reconciliation of Covenants\\\". Tracing the etymology of the concepts used, the author of the article clearly demonstrates the existing contradictions in the terms \\\"type\\\", \\\"antithype\\\" and \\\"antithype\\\", and also analyzes the difficulties that arise when translating these concepts into Russian. Based on this research, it becomes possible to offer the most correct and unambiguously interpreted terms. The relevance of the study is explained by the absence in the Russian research literature of a system of terms for the iconographic principle under consideration, as well as individual Old Testament subjects-prototypes and their New Testament analogies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":333566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Человек и культура\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Человек и культура\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2022.3.38269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Человек и культура","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2022.3.38269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的研究对象是外国和俄罗斯史学传统中正在形成的术语工具,描述与基督教圣像学中圣约的类型学平行原则相关的概念。这一原则是基于“新约和解”的教义(将旧约事件视为新约历史的原型),并奠定了早期基督教艺术中许多纪念碑的情节组织的基础。在中世纪鼎盛时期,这一原则成为绘画、雕塑、装饰和应用艺术纪念碑肖像学的基本原则之一。该研究的主题是将研究中普遍接受的术语加起来的过程,这些术语专门用于有问题的图像技术。本文还提出了国内外史学术语之间的相关性问题。本文通过对基督教圣像学研究中增加术语工具的分析,认为现代科学,特别是国内科学没有统一的术语系统来描述基督教圣像学中极其重要和普遍的现象——“圣约和解”原则在图像循环中的反映。本文通过对这些概念的词源进行追溯,清楚地说明了“类型”、“反类型”和“反类型”这三个词之间存在的矛盾,并分析了这些概念在俄文翻译时所遇到的困难。基于这项研究,提供最正确和最明确的解释成为可能。这项研究的相关性是由于在俄罗斯的研究文献中没有考虑到的图像原则的术语系统,以及单个旧约主题-原型及其新约类比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Principle of Typological Parallelism of Testaments in Christian Iconography: on the Problem of Terminology
The object of research in this article is the terminological apparatus that is being formed in the foreign and russian historiographical tradition, describing concepts related to the principle of typological parallelism of Covenants in Christian iconography. This principle is based on the doctrine of "Reconciliation of Testaments" (considering Old Testament events as prototypes of New Testament history) and underlies the organization of plots already in a number of monuments of early Christian art. In the era of the High Middle Ages, this principle became one of the fundamental in the iconography of monuments of painting, sculpture and decorative and applied art. The subject of the study was the process of adding up the generally accepted terminology in studies devoted to the iconographic technique in question. The article also raises the problem of correlation between terms used in foreign and domestic historiography. Based on the analysis of the addition of the terminological apparatus in research on Christian iconography, the article concludes that there is no unified system of terms in modern science, especially in the domestic one, to describe the extremely important and widespread phenomenon of Christian iconography – the reflection in the pictorial cycles of the principle of "Reconciliation of Covenants". Tracing the etymology of the concepts used, the author of the article clearly demonstrates the existing contradictions in the terms "type", "antithype" and "antithype", and also analyzes the difficulties that arise when translating these concepts into Russian. Based on this research, it becomes possible to offer the most correct and unambiguously interpreted terms. The relevance of the study is explained by the absence in the Russian research literature of a system of terms for the iconographic principle under consideration, as well as individual Old Testament subjects-prototypes and their New Testament analogies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信