在作者归属中使用虚词:词袋与顺序规则

M. Boukhaled, J. Ganascia
{"title":"在作者归属中使用虚词:词袋与顺序规则","authors":"M. Boukhaled, J. Ganascia","doi":"10.1515/9781501501289.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the author of a given document. Various style markers have been proposed in the literature to deal with the authorship attribution task. Frequencies of function words have been shown to be very reliable and effective for this task. However, despite the fact that they are state-of-the-art, they basically rely on the invalid bag-of-words assumption, which stipulates that text is a set of independent words. In this contribution, we present a comparative study on using two different types of style marker based on function words for authorship attribution. We compare the effectiveness of using sequential rules of function words as style marker that do not relay on the bag-of-words assumption to that of the frequency of function words which does. Our results show that the frequencies of function words outperform the sequential rules.","PeriodicalId":378427,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Function Words for Authorship Attribution: Bag-Of-Words vs. Sequential Rules\",\"authors\":\"M. Boukhaled, J. Ganascia\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9781501501289.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the author of a given document. Various style markers have been proposed in the literature to deal with the authorship attribution task. Frequencies of function words have been shown to be very reliable and effective for this task. However, despite the fact that they are state-of-the-art, they basically rely on the invalid bag-of-words assumption, which stipulates that text is a set of independent words. In this contribution, we present a comparative study on using two different types of style marker based on function words for authorship attribution. We compare the effectiveness of using sequential rules of function words as style marker that do not relay on the bag-of-words assumption to that of the frequency of function words which does. Our results show that the frequencies of function words outperform the sequential rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501501289.115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501501289.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

作者归属是识别给定文档的作者的任务。文献中提出了各种风格标记来处理作者归属任务。虚词的频率已经被证明是非常可靠和有效的。然而,尽管它们是最先进的,但它们基本上依赖于无效词袋假设,即文本是一组独立的词。在这篇文章中,我们对两种不同类型的基于虚词的风格标记进行了作者归属的比较研究。我们比较了不依赖词袋假设的虚词顺序规则作为风格标记与依赖词袋假设的虚词频率作为风格标记的有效性。我们的研究结果表明,虚词的频率优于顺序规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Function Words for Authorship Attribution: Bag-Of-Words vs. Sequential Rules
Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the author of a given document. Various style markers have been proposed in the literature to deal with the authorship attribution task. Frequencies of function words have been shown to be very reliable and effective for this task. However, despite the fact that they are state-of-the-art, they basically rely on the invalid bag-of-words assumption, which stipulates that text is a set of independent words. In this contribution, we present a comparative study on using two different types of style marker based on function words for authorship attribution. We compare the effectiveness of using sequential rules of function words as style marker that do not relay on the bag-of-words assumption to that of the frequency of function words which does. Our results show that the frequencies of function words outperform the sequential rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信