一种用于系统验证的可观测性覆盖方法

Peter Lisherness, K. Cheng
{"title":"一种用于系统验证的可观测性覆盖方法","authors":"Peter Lisherness, K. Cheng","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve effectiveness and efficiency of post-silicon validation, we present a fault-symbol tracking method and a coverage metric that account for the limited observability in silicon and thus are useful for guiding validation test selection, test development, and design for debug. The coverage points targeted in this study are a set of fault-symbols, or ‘tags’, generated from each expression in a system model. Coverage is measured in simulation by tracking tags alongside dynamic information flows to user-defined or implicit observation points. Computation of the metric is performed based on high-level (C/C++) functional and behavioral models through compiler-inserted parallel fault-symbol tracking instrumentation, which offers high efficiency as well as compatibility with existing simulation flows. The coverage results from our initial implementation for a microcontroller instruction set simulator are compared with the statement and mutation coverages. The results show that the new coverage metric is more accurate than the statement coverage and can be computed in significantly shorter runtimes than the mutation coverage.","PeriodicalId":153879,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An instrumented observability coverage method for system validation\",\"authors\":\"Peter Lisherness, K. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to improve effectiveness and efficiency of post-silicon validation, we present a fault-symbol tracking method and a coverage metric that account for the limited observability in silicon and thus are useful for guiding validation test selection, test development, and design for debug. The coverage points targeted in this study are a set of fault-symbols, or ‘tags’, generated from each expression in a system model. Coverage is measured in simulation by tracking tags alongside dynamic information flows to user-defined or implicit observation points. Computation of the metric is performed based on high-level (C/C++) functional and behavioral models through compiler-inserted parallel fault-symbol tracking instrumentation, which offers high efficiency as well as compatibility with existing simulation flows. The coverage results from our initial implementation for a microcontroller instruction set simulator are compared with the statement and mutation coverages. The results show that the new coverage metric is more accurate than the statement coverage and can be computed in significantly shorter runtimes than the mutation coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

为了提高后硅验证的有效性和效率,我们提出了一种故障符号跟踪方法和覆盖度量,该方法考虑了硅中有限的可观察性,从而有助于指导验证测试的选择、测试开发和调试设计。本研究中的覆盖点是一组故障符号,或“标签”,由系统模型中的每个表达式生成。覆盖是在模拟中通过跟踪标签以及用户定义的或隐含的观察点的动态信息流来测量的。度量的计算基于高级(C/ c++)函数和行为模型,通过插入编译器的并行故障符号跟踪工具进行,具有高效率和与现有仿真流程的兼容性。我们对微控制器指令集模拟器的初始实现的覆盖结果与语句和突变覆盖进行了比较。结果表明,新的覆盖率度量比语句覆盖率更准确,并且可以在比突变覆盖率更短的运行时间内计算出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An instrumented observability coverage method for system validation
In order to improve effectiveness and efficiency of post-silicon validation, we present a fault-symbol tracking method and a coverage metric that account for the limited observability in silicon and thus are useful for guiding validation test selection, test development, and design for debug. The coverage points targeted in this study are a set of fault-symbols, or ‘tags’, generated from each expression in a system model. Coverage is measured in simulation by tracking tags alongside dynamic information flows to user-defined or implicit observation points. Computation of the metric is performed based on high-level (C/C++) functional and behavioral models through compiler-inserted parallel fault-symbol tracking instrumentation, which offers high efficiency as well as compatibility with existing simulation flows. The coverage results from our initial implementation for a microcontroller instruction set simulator are compared with the statement and mutation coverages. The results show that the new coverage metric is more accurate than the statement coverage and can be computed in significantly shorter runtimes than the mutation coverage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信