个人行为、监管责任与公司风险暴露:英国竞争法中个人制裁的威慑作用

Samet Caliskan
{"title":"个人行为、监管责任与公司风险暴露:英国竞争法中个人制裁的威慑作用","authors":"Samet Caliskan","doi":"10.1093/JECLAP/LPZ018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UK competition law authorities primarily target companies. Such a strategy exposes companies to the risk of liability and loss, and its lack of effectiveness in deterring anti-competitive behaviour has led to the introduction of individual sanctions, which were greatly expected to deter wrongdoing directors. They however have not achieved the desired deterrent effect on wrongdoing directors, since there have been few cases in which individuals have been targeted. This illustrates either that serious obstacles faced by UK competition law authorities in cracking down on individuals, or that there is considerable reluctance from both these authorities and the courts to enforce the tools and convict. In either scenario, companies are left with no option but to mitigate the risk arising from the anticompetitive behaviour of directors.","PeriodicalId":434487,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Behaviour, Regulatory Liability, and a Company’s Exposure to Risk: The Deterrent Effect of Individual Sanctions in UK Competition Law\",\"authors\":\"Samet Caliskan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JECLAP/LPZ018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"UK competition law authorities primarily target companies. Such a strategy exposes companies to the risk of liability and loss, and its lack of effectiveness in deterring anti-competitive behaviour has led to the introduction of individual sanctions, which were greatly expected to deter wrongdoing directors. They however have not achieved the desired deterrent effect on wrongdoing directors, since there have been few cases in which individuals have been targeted. This illustrates either that serious obstacles faced by UK competition law authorities in cracking down on individuals, or that there is considerable reluctance from both these authorities and the courts to enforce the tools and convict. In either scenario, companies are left with no option but to mitigate the risk arising from the anticompetitive behaviour of directors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JECLAP/LPZ018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JECLAP/LPZ018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

英国竞争法当局的主要目标是企业。这种策略使公司面临责任和损失的风险,而且它在阻止反竞争行为方面缺乏有效性,这导致了对个人制裁的引入,人们很大程度上期望这种制裁能阻止有不当行为的董事。然而,它们并没有达到对违规董事的预期威慑效果,因为很少有个人成为目标的案例。这要么表明英国竞争法当局在打击个人行为方面面临严重障碍,要么表明这些当局和法院在执行这些工具和定罪方面都相当不情愿。在这两种情况下,企业都别无选择,只能减轻董事反竞争行为带来的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual Behaviour, Regulatory Liability, and a Company’s Exposure to Risk: The Deterrent Effect of Individual Sanctions in UK Competition Law
UK competition law authorities primarily target companies. Such a strategy exposes companies to the risk of liability and loss, and its lack of effectiveness in deterring anti-competitive behaviour has led to the introduction of individual sanctions, which were greatly expected to deter wrongdoing directors. They however have not achieved the desired deterrent effect on wrongdoing directors, since there have been few cases in which individuals have been targeted. This illustrates either that serious obstacles faced by UK competition law authorities in cracking down on individuals, or that there is considerable reluctance from both these authorities and the courts to enforce the tools and convict. In either scenario, companies are left with no option but to mitigate the risk arising from the anticompetitive behaviour of directors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信