{"title":"TAF预报质量评价态度比较","authors":"David Sládek","doi":"10.1109/MILTECHS.2019.8870081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes methods of accuracy evaluation of TAF and directive setting rules for TAF forecasts. Further, it deals with the laches in the directive on one hand and in methods and between methods on the other. In the end, it compares the methods and enlightens some of insufficiencies of methods and concludes basic requirements for improving or building up a new method.","PeriodicalId":107301,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes Comparison of TAF Forecast Quality Assessment\",\"authors\":\"David Sládek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILTECHS.2019.8870081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes methods of accuracy evaluation of TAF and directive setting rules for TAF forecasts. Further, it deals with the laches in the directive on one hand and in methods and between methods on the other. In the end, it compares the methods and enlightens some of insufficiencies of methods and concludes basic requirements for improving or building up a new method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILTECHS.2019.8870081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILTECHS.2019.8870081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudes Comparison of TAF Forecast Quality Assessment
This paper summarizes methods of accuracy evaluation of TAF and directive setting rules for TAF forecasts. Further, it deals with the laches in the directive on one hand and in methods and between methods on the other. In the end, it compares the methods and enlightens some of insufficiencies of methods and concludes basic requirements for improving or building up a new method.