石棉和保险利益集团继续使用不可信的科学论据来销售石棉,并拒绝为石棉受害者伸张正义

Kathleen Ruff, Eliezer João de Souza, F. Giannasi, Evelyn Glensk, M. Hindry, Linda H. Reinstein, A. Prieto, Gopala Krishna, L. Kazan-Allen, Eric Jonckheere, Robert Vojakovic, P. Iselin
{"title":"石棉和保险利益集团继续使用不可信的科学论据来销售石棉,并拒绝为石棉受害者伸张正义","authors":"Kathleen Ruff, Eliezer João de Souza, F. Giannasi, Evelyn Glensk, M. Hindry, Linda H. Reinstein, A. Prieto, Gopala Krishna, L. Kazan-Allen, Eric Jonckheere, Robert Vojakovic, P. Iselin","doi":"10.35122/JOSPI.2019.719640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chrysotile asbestos represents ninety-five percent of all asbestos sold over the past century. For more than two decades the global asbestos trade has consisted entirely of\nchrysotile asbestos. For this reason, it has been imperative for the asbestos industry, in order to ensure its survival, to claim that chrysotile asbestos can be used safely and that only other amphibole forms of asbestos are harmful. The scientific evidence is overwhelming that chrysotile asbestos causes deadly diseases, such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung, and other cancers, and that use of chrysotile asbestos should stop. The asbestos industry has, therefore, spent millions of dollars paying scientists to carry out a misinformation campaign to deny the scientific evidence and claim that, while amphibole asbestos causes harm to health, chrysotile asbestos does not.","PeriodicalId":318895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asbestos and insurance interests continue to use discredited scientific argument to sell asbestos and to deny justice to asbestos victims\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Ruff, Eliezer João de Souza, F. Giannasi, Evelyn Glensk, M. Hindry, Linda H. Reinstein, A. Prieto, Gopala Krishna, L. Kazan-Allen, Eric Jonckheere, Robert Vojakovic, P. Iselin\",\"doi\":\"10.35122/JOSPI.2019.719640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chrysotile asbestos represents ninety-five percent of all asbestos sold over the past century. For more than two decades the global asbestos trade has consisted entirely of\\nchrysotile asbestos. For this reason, it has been imperative for the asbestos industry, in order to ensure its survival, to claim that chrysotile asbestos can be used safely and that only other amphibole forms of asbestos are harmful. The scientific evidence is overwhelming that chrysotile asbestos causes deadly diseases, such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung, and other cancers, and that use of chrysotile asbestos should stop. The asbestos industry has, therefore, spent millions of dollars paying scientists to carry out a misinformation campaign to deny the scientific evidence and claim that, while amphibole asbestos causes harm to health, chrysotile asbestos does not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35122/JOSPI.2019.719640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35122/JOSPI.2019.719640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

温石棉占上个世纪销售的所有石棉的95%。二十多年来,全球石棉贸易完全由温石棉组成。出于这个原因,石棉工业为了确保其生存,必须声称温石棉可以安全使用,只有其他角闪孔形式的石棉是有害的。科学证据充分表明,温石棉会导致致命疾病,如石棉沉滞症、间皮瘤、肺癌和其他癌症,应停止使用温石棉。因此,石棉工业花费了数百万美元聘请科学家进行一场误导运动,以否认科学证据,并声称,虽然角闪孔石棉对健康有害,但温石棉不会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asbestos and insurance interests continue to use discredited scientific argument to sell asbestos and to deny justice to asbestos victims
Chrysotile asbestos represents ninety-five percent of all asbestos sold over the past century. For more than two decades the global asbestos trade has consisted entirely of chrysotile asbestos. For this reason, it has been imperative for the asbestos industry, in order to ensure its survival, to claim that chrysotile asbestos can be used safely and that only other amphibole forms of asbestos are harmful. The scientific evidence is overwhelming that chrysotile asbestos causes deadly diseases, such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung, and other cancers, and that use of chrysotile asbestos should stop. The asbestos industry has, therefore, spent millions of dollars paying scientists to carry out a misinformation campaign to deny the scientific evidence and claim that, while amphibole asbestos causes harm to health, chrysotile asbestos does not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信