验证基于Mind maing的技术技术模块

Nanndo Yannuansa, Jati Widyo L, Agung Widyo Samudra
{"title":"验证基于Mind maing的技术技术模块","authors":"Nanndo Yannuansa, Jati Widyo L, Agung Widyo Samudra","doi":"10.31539/judika.v3i2.1672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to see the mind mapping in terms of the quality of the material and media feasibility of validation by module experts. Expert validation is needed in module development so that the module is feasible or not used. Aspects that are validated are aspects of the module material including content, language, and media aspects of the module including presentation, and graphics. In looking at the quality aspect of the need analysis and validation of making a mind mapping based technique mathematics learning module by testing its feasibility before use. The validation analysis in the module uses methods from Crocker and Algina. The data instrument in this study was a validation questionnaire sheet. The results showed that the average feasibility aspect for the media was 89.79% and the material was 86.09, a total of 86.83%. In other words, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module fulfilled the feasibility aspect. In conclusion, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module developed is feasible in terms of media and module material. \nKeywords: Mathematical Techniques, Mind mapping, Modules, Validation","PeriodicalId":177009,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validasi Modul Matematika Teknik Berbasis Mind Mapping\",\"authors\":\"Nanndo Yannuansa, Jati Widyo L, Agung Widyo Samudra\",\"doi\":\"10.31539/judika.v3i2.1672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to see the mind mapping in terms of the quality of the material and media feasibility of validation by module experts. Expert validation is needed in module development so that the module is feasible or not used. Aspects that are validated are aspects of the module material including content, language, and media aspects of the module including presentation, and graphics. In looking at the quality aspect of the need analysis and validation of making a mind mapping based technique mathematics learning module by testing its feasibility before use. The validation analysis in the module uses methods from Crocker and Algina. The data instrument in this study was a validation questionnaire sheet. The results showed that the average feasibility aspect for the media was 89.79% and the material was 86.09, a total of 86.83%. In other words, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module fulfilled the feasibility aspect. In conclusion, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module developed is feasible in terms of media and module material. \\nKeywords: Mathematical Techniques, Mind mapping, Modules, Validation\",\"PeriodicalId\":177009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v3i2.1672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v3i2.1672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是观察思维导图在材料质量和媒介方面的可行性,并由模块专家进行验证。在模块开发中需要专家验证,以确定模块是否可行。被验证的方面是模块材料的各个方面,包括内容、语言和模块的媒体方面,包括演示和图形。在质量方面对基于思维导图技术的数学学习模块进行了需求分析和验证,并在使用前对其可行性进行了测试。模块中的验证分析使用了Crocker和Algina的方法。本研究的数据工具为验证问卷。结果表明,介质的平均可行性系数为89.79%,材料的平均可行性系数为86.09,共为86.83%。也就是说,基于思维导图的工程数学模块满足了可行性方面的要求。综上所述,开发的基于思维导图的工程数学模块在媒介和模块材料方面是可行的。关键词:数学技巧,思维导图,模块,验证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validasi Modul Matematika Teknik Berbasis Mind Mapping
The purpose of this study was to see the mind mapping in terms of the quality of the material and media feasibility of validation by module experts. Expert validation is needed in module development so that the module is feasible or not used. Aspects that are validated are aspects of the module material including content, language, and media aspects of the module including presentation, and graphics. In looking at the quality aspect of the need analysis and validation of making a mind mapping based technique mathematics learning module by testing its feasibility before use. The validation analysis in the module uses methods from Crocker and Algina. The data instrument in this study was a validation questionnaire sheet. The results showed that the average feasibility aspect for the media was 89.79% and the material was 86.09, a total of 86.83%. In other words, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module fulfilled the feasibility aspect. In conclusion, the Mind mapping-based engineering mathematics module developed is feasible in terms of media and module material. Keywords: Mathematical Techniques, Mind mapping, Modules, Validation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信