存在传染风险时形成的网络

L. Blume, D. Easley, J. Kleinberg, Robert D. Kleinberg, É. Tardos
{"title":"存在传染风险时形成的网络","authors":"L. Blume, D. Easley, J. Kleinberg, Robert D. Kleinberg, É. Tardos","doi":"10.1145/1993574.1993576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a number of domains where agents must collectively form a network in the face of the following trade-off: each agent receives benefits from the direct links it forms to others, but these links expose it to the risk of being hit by a cascading failure that might spread over multi-step paths. Financial contagion, epidemic disease, and the exposure of covert organizations to discovery are all settings in which such issues have been articulated.\n Here we formulate the problem in terms of strategic network formation, and provide asymptotically tight bounds on the welfare of both optimal and stable networks. We find that socially optimal networks are, in a precise sense, situated just beyond a phase transition in the behavior of the cascading failures, and that stable graphs lie slightly further beyond this phase transition, at a point where most of the available welfare has been lost. Our analysis enables us to explore such issues as the trade-offs between clustered and anonymous market structures, and it exposes a fundamental sense in which very small amounts of \"over-linking\" in networks with contagious risk can have strong consequences for the welfare of the participants.","PeriodicalId":194623,"journal":{"name":"ACM Trans. Economics and Comput.","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network formation in the presence of contagious risk\",\"authors\":\"L. Blume, D. Easley, J. Kleinberg, Robert D. Kleinberg, É. Tardos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1993574.1993576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are a number of domains where agents must collectively form a network in the face of the following trade-off: each agent receives benefits from the direct links it forms to others, but these links expose it to the risk of being hit by a cascading failure that might spread over multi-step paths. Financial contagion, epidemic disease, and the exposure of covert organizations to discovery are all settings in which such issues have been articulated.\\n Here we formulate the problem in terms of strategic network formation, and provide asymptotically tight bounds on the welfare of both optimal and stable networks. We find that socially optimal networks are, in a precise sense, situated just beyond a phase transition in the behavior of the cascading failures, and that stable graphs lie slightly further beyond this phase transition, at a point where most of the available welfare has been lost. Our analysis enables us to explore such issues as the trade-offs between clustered and anonymous market structures, and it exposes a fundamental sense in which very small amounts of \\\"over-linking\\\" in networks with contagious risk can have strong consequences for the welfare of the participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Trans. Economics and Comput.\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Trans. Economics and Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1993574.1993576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Trans. Economics and Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1993574.1993576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

面对以下权衡,在许多领域中,代理必须集体形成一个网络:每个代理都从它与其他代理形成的直接链接中获益,但这些链接使其面临可能在多步骤路径上传播的级联故障的风险。金融传染、流行病和秘密组织暴露于发现都是这些问题被阐明的背景。在这里,我们从战略网络形成的角度来表述这个问题,并给出了最优和稳定网络的福利的渐近紧界。我们发现,从精确的意义上说,社会最优网络恰好位于级联失效行为的一个相变之外,而稳定图则稍微超出这个相变,在这个点上,大多数可用的福利已经失去了。我们的分析使我们能够探索集群和匿名市场结构之间的权衡等问题,它揭示了一个基本的意义,即在具有传染性风险的网络中,非常少量的“过度连接”可能对参与者的福利产生强烈的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network formation in the presence of contagious risk
There are a number of domains where agents must collectively form a network in the face of the following trade-off: each agent receives benefits from the direct links it forms to others, but these links expose it to the risk of being hit by a cascading failure that might spread over multi-step paths. Financial contagion, epidemic disease, and the exposure of covert organizations to discovery are all settings in which such issues have been articulated. Here we formulate the problem in terms of strategic network formation, and provide asymptotically tight bounds on the welfare of both optimal and stable networks. We find that socially optimal networks are, in a precise sense, situated just beyond a phase transition in the behavior of the cascading failures, and that stable graphs lie slightly further beyond this phase transition, at a point where most of the available welfare has been lost. Our analysis enables us to explore such issues as the trade-offs between clustered and anonymous market structures, and it exposes a fundamental sense in which very small amounts of "over-linking" in networks with contagious risk can have strong consequences for the welfare of the participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信