语言干预对英语学习者数学成绩的影响:文献荟萃分析

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Genesis D. Arizmendi, Jui-Teng Li, M. Lee Van Horn, Stefania D. Petcu, H. Lee Swanson
{"title":"语言干预对英语学习者数学成绩的影响:文献荟萃分析","authors":"Genesis D. Arizmendi,&nbsp;Jui-Teng Li,&nbsp;M. Lee Van Horn,&nbsp;Stefania D. Petcu,&nbsp;H. Lee Swanson","doi":"10.1111/ldrp.12239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This meta-analysis synthesized research on math performance outcomes for English learners (EL) as a function of language-focused (math vocabulary) interventions. We included group and single-subject design studies with children from kindergarten to 8th grade (3,766 students for group, 30 for single-subject). Group studies yielded a mean Hedges’ <i>g</i> of 0.26 in favor of the interventions relative to the control conditions, whereas single-subject studies yielded a mean Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data of 81.01% and <i>Phi</i> coefficient of .66 relative to baseline. Although group studies yielded small effect sizes (ESs), we found significant moderators for grade level, intervention focus, and length of intervention. Single-subject studies yielded higher ESs than group studies, and were considered generally effective, with a high ES. This finding was attributed to a direct focus on children with math difficulties and one-to-one instruction. The implications for practice and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"36 1","pages":"56-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ldrp.12239","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language-Focused Interventions on Math Performance for English Learners: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Genesis D. Arizmendi,&nbsp;Jui-Teng Li,&nbsp;M. Lee Van Horn,&nbsp;Stefania D. Petcu,&nbsp;H. Lee Swanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ldrp.12239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This meta-analysis synthesized research on math performance outcomes for English learners (EL) as a function of language-focused (math vocabulary) interventions. We included group and single-subject design studies with children from kindergarten to 8th grade (3,766 students for group, 30 for single-subject). Group studies yielded a mean Hedges’ <i>g</i> of 0.26 in favor of the interventions relative to the control conditions, whereas single-subject studies yielded a mean Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data of 81.01% and <i>Phi</i> coefficient of .66 relative to baseline. Although group studies yielded small effect sizes (ESs), we found significant moderators for grade level, intervention focus, and length of intervention. Single-subject studies yielded higher ESs than group studies, and were considered generally effective, with a high ES. This finding was attributed to a direct focus on children with math difficulties and one-to-one instruction. The implications for practice and future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"56-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ldrp.12239\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12239\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本荟萃分析综合了以语言为中心(数学词汇)干预对英语学习者数学表现结果的影响。我们纳入了从幼儿园到8年级儿童的组和单受试者设计研究(组3766名学生,单受试者30名)。相对于对照条件,组研究的平均Hedges ' g为0.26,而单受试者研究的平均非重叠数据百分比为81.01%,相对于基线的Phi系数为0.66。虽然小组研究产生了较小的效应量(ESs),但我们发现年级水平、干预重点和干预时间的显著调节因子。单受试者研究的ES比分组研究高,通常被认为是有效的,具有较高的ES。这一发现归因于对有数学困难的儿童的直接关注和一对一的指导。最后讨论了对实践和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language-Focused Interventions on Math Performance for English Learners: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature

This meta-analysis synthesized research on math performance outcomes for English learners (EL) as a function of language-focused (math vocabulary) interventions. We included group and single-subject design studies with children from kindergarten to 8th grade (3,766 students for group, 30 for single-subject). Group studies yielded a mean Hedges’ g of 0.26 in favor of the interventions relative to the control conditions, whereas single-subject studies yielded a mean Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data of 81.01% and Phi coefficient of .66 relative to baseline. Although group studies yielded small effect sizes (ESs), we found significant moderators for grade level, intervention focus, and length of intervention. Single-subject studies yielded higher ESs than group studies, and were considered generally effective, with a high ES. This finding was attributed to a direct focus on children with math difficulties and one-to-one instruction. The implications for practice and future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信