关于超级资源产品评估的理论和方法方面

Adam Bodayuk
{"title":"关于超级资源产品评估的理论和方法方面","authors":"Adam Bodayuk","doi":"10.33813/2224-1213.24.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study is the value of geological objects investigated for the needs of defining a number of concepts related to economic and fiscal geology.\nThe purpose of this article is to substantiate the nature of resource-resource fiscalization of subsoil use and methods of estimated calculation of its indicators. Methodology of work – the method of monographic analysis (in determining the cost-resource approach); method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of economic and fiscal geology); method of generalization (when forming conclusions and suggestions).\nMethodology of work – method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of fiscal geology, in particular, fiscal subsoil-resource product); monographic analysis (when using the resource-cost approach), volumetric- geochemical method (to quantify the estimated and prospective resources by the results of geochemical studies); comparison and generalization (when forming conclusions and proposals).\nResults of work. According to the results of the conducted researches of the essence, content, processes of subsoil use and methods of determining its cost indicators, according to literature sources and official documents, certain fiscal concepts of fiscal geology are substantiated. The essence of resource-based fiscalisation in subsoil use is defined as the conduct of certain studies of subsoil objects, the allocation of subsoil products, the determination of their resource indicators, and the establishment using official and non-official methods of value of these objects.The value-for-money approach to the evaluation of the subsoil resource product (required) is substantiated. This approach first distinguishes the explorable geological object, further distinguishes it from subsoil resources, then provides these products with specific methods of value estimation. These estimates determine the expected sale price of the property, the cost of renting the property, permanent ownership, permanent use, etc., as well as payments to the state treasury.\nConclusions and suggestions. Cost and resource fiscalisation is interpreted as the determination of the fiscal value of subsoil resources products, on the basis of which the fiscal payments are calculated. The methodologies for calculating the cost of mining are necessary with certain additions and practical calculations combined into a recommendation document, discuss it, check it in practice, make certain adjustments and officially approve it for use in determining the fiscal value.\nKeywords: subsoil, minerals, resources, costs, expenses, extraction, payment.","PeriodicalId":206442,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical and methodological aspects regarding the evaluation of a super-resource product\",\"authors\":\"Adam Bodayuk\",\"doi\":\"10.33813/2224-1213.24.2021.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the study is the value of geological objects investigated for the needs of defining a number of concepts related to economic and fiscal geology.\\nThe purpose of this article is to substantiate the nature of resource-resource fiscalization of subsoil use and methods of estimated calculation of its indicators. Methodology of work – the method of monographic analysis (in determining the cost-resource approach); method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of economic and fiscal geology); method of generalization (when forming conclusions and suggestions).\\nMethodology of work – method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of fiscal geology, in particular, fiscal subsoil-resource product); monographic analysis (when using the resource-cost approach), volumetric- geochemical method (to quantify the estimated and prospective resources by the results of geochemical studies); comparison and generalization (when forming conclusions and proposals).\\nResults of work. According to the results of the conducted researches of the essence, content, processes of subsoil use and methods of determining its cost indicators, according to literature sources and official documents, certain fiscal concepts of fiscal geology are substantiated. The essence of resource-based fiscalisation in subsoil use is defined as the conduct of certain studies of subsoil objects, the allocation of subsoil products, the determination of their resource indicators, and the establishment using official and non-official methods of value of these objects.The value-for-money approach to the evaluation of the subsoil resource product (required) is substantiated. This approach first distinguishes the explorable geological object, further distinguishes it from subsoil resources, then provides these products with specific methods of value estimation. These estimates determine the expected sale price of the property, the cost of renting the property, permanent ownership, permanent use, etc., as well as payments to the state treasury.\\nConclusions and suggestions. Cost and resource fiscalisation is interpreted as the determination of the fiscal value of subsoil resources products, on the basis of which the fiscal payments are calculated. The methodologies for calculating the cost of mining are necessary with certain additions and practical calculations combined into a recommendation document, discuss it, check it in practice, make certain adjustments and officially approve it for use in determining the fiscal value.\\nKeywords: subsoil, minerals, resources, costs, expenses, extraction, payment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33813/2224-1213.24.2021.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33813/2224-1213.24.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的主题是为了确定与经济和财政地质学有关的一些概念的需要而调查的地质对象的价值。本文的目的是论证底土利用资源-资源财政化的性质及其各项指标的估算计算方法。工作方法-专题分析方法(确定成本-资源方法);抽象逻辑分析法(经济财政地质学概念体系的界定)概括的方法(当形成结论和建议时)。工作方法。抽象逻辑分析方法(在确定财政地质学概念系统,特别是财政底土资源产品的概念系统时);专题分析(当使用资源成本方法时),体积-地球化学方法(通过地球化学研究的结果量化估计的和预期的资源);比较和概括(在形成结论和建议时)。工作成果。根据对底土利用的本质、内容、过程和成本指标确定方法的研究结果,根据文献资料和官方文件,充实了财政地质学的一些财政概念。地底利用中资源型财政化的本质是对地底物进行一定的研究,分配地底产品,确定其资源指标,并使用官方和非官方的方法建立这些物体的价值。用物有所值的方法来评价地下资源产品(所需)是有根据的。该方法首先对可勘探地质对象进行区分,并进一步将其与地下资源进行区分,然后为这些产品提供具体的价值估算方法。这些估算决定了房产的预期销售价格、租赁成本、永久所有权、永久使用等,以及向国库的支付。结论与建议。成本和资源财政化被解释为确定地下资源产品的财政价值,并以此为基础计算财政支付。计算采矿成本的方法是必要的,并将某些补充和实际计算结合成建议文件,进行讨论,在实践中进行检查,进行某些调整并正式批准用于确定财政价值。关键词:底土,矿产,资源,成本,费用,开采,支付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical and methodological aspects regarding the evaluation of a super-resource product
The subject of the study is the value of geological objects investigated for the needs of defining a number of concepts related to economic and fiscal geology. The purpose of this article is to substantiate the nature of resource-resource fiscalization of subsoil use and methods of estimated calculation of its indicators. Methodology of work – the method of monographic analysis (in determining the cost-resource approach); method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of economic and fiscal geology); method of generalization (when forming conclusions and suggestions). Methodology of work – method of abstract-logical analysis (in defining the system of concepts of fiscal geology, in particular, fiscal subsoil-resource product); monographic analysis (when using the resource-cost approach), volumetric- geochemical method (to quantify the estimated and prospective resources by the results of geochemical studies); comparison and generalization (when forming conclusions and proposals). Results of work. According to the results of the conducted researches of the essence, content, processes of subsoil use and methods of determining its cost indicators, according to literature sources and official documents, certain fiscal concepts of fiscal geology are substantiated. The essence of resource-based fiscalisation in subsoil use is defined as the conduct of certain studies of subsoil objects, the allocation of subsoil products, the determination of their resource indicators, and the establishment using official and non-official methods of value of these objects.The value-for-money approach to the evaluation of the subsoil resource product (required) is substantiated. This approach first distinguishes the explorable geological object, further distinguishes it from subsoil resources, then provides these products with specific methods of value estimation. These estimates determine the expected sale price of the property, the cost of renting the property, permanent ownership, permanent use, etc., as well as payments to the state treasury. Conclusions and suggestions. Cost and resource fiscalisation is interpreted as the determination of the fiscal value of subsoil resources products, on the basis of which the fiscal payments are calculated. The methodologies for calculating the cost of mining are necessary with certain additions and practical calculations combined into a recommendation document, discuss it, check it in practice, make certain adjustments and officially approve it for use in determining the fiscal value. Keywords: subsoil, minerals, resources, costs, expenses, extraction, payment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信