GCSC-BtA杀菌剂对东南菜地害虫及其天敌种群动态的影响

C. Sengonca , B. Liu
{"title":"GCSC-BtA杀菌剂对东南菜地害虫及其天敌种群动态的影响","authors":"C. \n Sengonca\n \n ,&nbsp;B. \n Liu","doi":"10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present paper deals with the effect of the biocide GCSC-BtA on population dynamics of cabbage pests, i. e., <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae), <i>Brevicoryne brassicae</i> (L.) (Hom., Aphididae), <i>Liriomyza sativae</i> Blanch. (Dip., Agromyzidae), <i>Phyllotreta vittata</i> Fabric. (Col., Chrysomelidae) and their natural enemies, i. e., <i>Apanteles plutellae</i> Kurdj. (Hym., Braconidae), <i>Erigonidium graminicola</i> (Sundv.) (Araneida, Linyphiidae), <i>Coccinella septempunctata</i> L. (Col., Coccinellidae), in common head cabbage (<i>Brassica oleracea var. capitata</i>) fields in the southeastern China. The experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, PR China in April – June, 2001.\n\nThe results showed that, at the end of sampling, the pest populations of <i>P. xylostella, B. brassicae</i> and <i>P. vittata</i> reached averages of 39.7, 68.3 and 6.2 ind. / 30 plants in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, which were about 1.5, 11 and 0.7 times lower than those treated with methomyl, respectively. In contrast, the natural enemy populations were, on average, 23.5 ind./30 plants for <i>A. plutellae</i>, 24.6 ind./30 plants for <i>E. graminicol</i> and 12.2 ind./30 plants for <i>C. septempunctata</i> in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, about 6, 5 and 3 times higher than for those treated with methomyl, respectively. The GCSC-BtA biocide demonstrated greater effectiveness in controlling the cabbage pests, e. g., <i>P. xylostella, B. brassicae</i> and <i>P. vittata</i>, having final decreasing ratios of 83.60, 97.05 and 53.67 % compared to 57.63, 64.89 and 30.88 % with the methomyl insecticide. However, it was less toxic to natural enemies, e. g., <i>A. plutellae, E. graminicola</i> and <i>C. septempunctata</i>, final decreasing ratios being 47.68, 17.84, 27.81 %, than methomyl, with 90.94, 80.80, 74.55 %, in comparison to the populations in the control plots, respectively. So, because of the low toxicity of GCSC-BtA to the natural enemies, it is recommended that, on one hand, its application should be carried out after mass migration of the pests to the fields, on the other hand, the alternative agent GCSC-BtA should be used with the aim of minimizing the harmfulness to the natural enemies in the whole program of integrated pest management in cabbage fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":100103,"journal":{"name":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of GCSC-BtA biocide on population dynamics of cabbage pests and their natural enemies from fields in southeastern China\",\"authors\":\"C. \\n Sengonca\\n \\n ,&nbsp;B. \\n Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present paper deals with the effect of the biocide GCSC-BtA on population dynamics of cabbage pests, i. e., <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae), <i>Brevicoryne brassicae</i> (L.) (Hom., Aphididae), <i>Liriomyza sativae</i> Blanch. (Dip., Agromyzidae), <i>Phyllotreta vittata</i> Fabric. (Col., Chrysomelidae) and their natural enemies, i. e., <i>Apanteles plutellae</i> Kurdj. (Hym., Braconidae), <i>Erigonidium graminicola</i> (Sundv.) (Araneida, Linyphiidae), <i>Coccinella septempunctata</i> L. (Col., Coccinellidae), in common head cabbage (<i>Brassica oleracea var. capitata</i>) fields in the southeastern China. The experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, PR China in April – June, 2001.\\n\\nThe results showed that, at the end of sampling, the pest populations of <i>P. xylostella, B. brassicae</i> and <i>P. vittata</i> reached averages of 39.7, 68.3 and 6.2 ind. / 30 plants in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, which were about 1.5, 11 and 0.7 times lower than those treated with methomyl, respectively. In contrast, the natural enemy populations were, on average, 23.5 ind./30 plants for <i>A. plutellae</i>, 24.6 ind./30 plants for <i>E. graminicol</i> and 12.2 ind./30 plants for <i>C. septempunctata</i> in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, about 6, 5 and 3 times higher than for those treated with methomyl, respectively. The GCSC-BtA biocide demonstrated greater effectiveness in controlling the cabbage pests, e. g., <i>P. xylostella, B. brassicae</i> and <i>P. vittata</i>, having final decreasing ratios of 83.60, 97.05 and 53.67 % compared to 57.63, 64.89 and 30.88 % with the methomyl insecticide. However, it was less toxic to natural enemies, e. g., <i>A. plutellae, E. graminicola</i> and <i>C. septempunctata</i>, final decreasing ratios being 47.68, 17.84, 27.81 %, than methomyl, with 90.94, 80.80, 74.55 %, in comparison to the populations in the control plots, respectively. So, because of the low toxicity of GCSC-BtA to the natural enemies, it is recommended that, on one hand, its application should be carried out after mass migration of the pests to the fields, on the other hand, the alternative agent GCSC-BtA should be used with the aim of minimizing the harmfulness to the natural enemies in the whole program of integrated pest management in cabbage fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2002.02014.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文研究了杀菌剂GCSC-BtA对白菜害虫种群动态的影响。小菜蛾(L.);,锦菜科),芸苔科(L.)(蚜虫科);(下降。,稻蚜科),叶根跳甲。(Col.,金凤花科)和它们的天敌;;;;;(Hym。中国东南部普通头白菜田(甘蓝科)、禾草小孢子虫(小孢子虫科)、七星瓢虫(瓢虫科)。试验于2001年4 - 6月在福建省农业科学院福州试验场进行。结果表明,取样结束时,小菜蛾、芸苔蛾和维塔蛾的平均种群数量分别为39.7、68.3和6.2只/ 30株,分别比灭多威低1.5倍、11倍和0.7倍。施用gcs - bta后,小菜蛾、禾草蛾和七星蛾的天敌种群数量分别为23.5个/30株、24.6个/30株和12.2个/30株,分别是灭多威处理的6倍、5倍和3倍。GCSC-BtA杀菌剂对白菜病虫害的防治效果较好。对小菜蛾、芸苔蛾和维塔蛾的最终降低率分别为83.60、97.05和53.67%,对灭多威的最终降低率分别为57.63、64.89和30.88%。然而,它对天敌的毒性较小,例如:对小菜蛾、禾草蛾和七星蛾的最终降低率分别为47.68、17.84、27.81%,分别比对照区降低90.94、80.80、74.55%。因此,由于GCSC-BtA对害虫的毒性较低,建议在害虫大量迁移到田间后进行施用,另一方面,在白菜田害虫综合治理的整个方案中,应以尽量减少对天敌的危害为目标,使用GCSC-BtA替代药剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of GCSC-BtA biocide on population dynamics of cabbage pests and their natural enemies from fields in southeastern China

The present paper deals with the effect of the biocide GCSC-BtA on population dynamics of cabbage pests, i. e., Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae), Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hom., Aphididae), Liriomyza sativae Blanch. (Dip., Agromyzidae), Phyllotreta vittata Fabric. (Col., Chrysomelidae) and their natural enemies, i. e., Apanteles plutellae Kurdj. (Hym., Braconidae), Erigonidium graminicola (Sundv.) (Araneida, Linyphiidae), Coccinella septempunctata L. (Col., Coccinellidae), in common head cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) fields in the southeastern China. The experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, PR China in April – June, 2001. The results showed that, at the end of sampling, the pest populations of P. xylostella, B. brassicae and P. vittata reached averages of 39.7, 68.3 and 6.2 ind. / 30 plants in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, which were about 1.5, 11 and 0.7 times lower than those treated with methomyl, respectively. In contrast, the natural enemy populations were, on average, 23.5 ind./30 plants for A. plutellae, 24.6 ind./30 plants for E. graminicol and 12.2 ind./30 plants for C. septempunctata in the plot treated with GCSC-BtA, about 6, 5 and 3 times higher than for those treated with methomyl, respectively. The GCSC-BtA biocide demonstrated greater effectiveness in controlling the cabbage pests, e. g., P. xylostella, B. brassicae and P. vittata, having final decreasing ratios of 83.60, 97.05 and 53.67 % compared to 57.63, 64.89 and 30.88 % with the methomyl insecticide. However, it was less toxic to natural enemies, e. g., A. plutellae, E. graminicola and C. septempunctata, final decreasing ratios being 47.68, 17.84, 27.81 %, than methomyl, with 90.94, 80.80, 74.55 %, in comparison to the populations in the control plots, respectively. So, because of the low toxicity of GCSC-BtA to the natural enemies, it is recommended that, on one hand, its application should be carried out after mass migration of the pests to the fields, on the other hand, the alternative agent GCSC-BtA should be used with the aim of minimizing the harmfulness to the natural enemies in the whole program of integrated pest management in cabbage fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信