鲁棒报头压缩(ROHC) ROHCv1和ROHCv2多媒体传输性能评价与比较

Mate Tomoskozi, P. Seeling, F. Fitzek
{"title":"鲁棒报头压缩(ROHC) ROHCv1和ROHCv2多媒体传输性能评价与比较","authors":"Mate Tomoskozi, P. Seeling, F. Fitzek","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOMW.2013.6825044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the two implementations of RObust Header Compression (ROHC), namely ROHCv1 (RFC 3095) and ROHCv2 (RFC 5225), are evaluated in terms of potential throughput increase and complexity for wireless IP networks and compared with each other for different multimedia streams. In order to compress the header information to a minimum, RoHCv1 has been proposed some years back and recently RoHCv2 has been proposed with a complete redesign compared to its predecessor. The novelty of this paper is the presentation of the performance evaluation of ROHCv2 as well as a comparison between the two approaches that have never been published before. In addition, this paper presents real-world performance measurements of ROHCv2 for the first time. Our findings show that both versions have great potential in saving bandwidth for multimedia traffic in wireless networks, even with varying channel conditions by an IP/UDP/RTP header a compression gain of 83% and 86% is possible for ROHCv1 and ROHCv2, respectively. While the second version of ROHC is giving generally slightly better compression ratios than the first version, we found situations where the first version performs better.","PeriodicalId":174992,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and comparison of RObust Header Compression (ROHC) ROHCv1 and ROHCv2 for multimedia delivery\",\"authors\":\"Mate Tomoskozi, P. Seeling, F. Fitzek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOCOMW.2013.6825044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the two implementations of RObust Header Compression (ROHC), namely ROHCv1 (RFC 3095) and ROHCv2 (RFC 5225), are evaluated in terms of potential throughput increase and complexity for wireless IP networks and compared with each other for different multimedia streams. In order to compress the header information to a minimum, RoHCv1 has been proposed some years back and recently RoHCv2 has been proposed with a complete redesign compared to its predecessor. The novelty of this paper is the presentation of the performance evaluation of ROHCv2 as well as a comparison between the two approaches that have never been published before. In addition, this paper presents real-world performance measurements of ROHCv2 for the first time. Our findings show that both versions have great potential in saving bandwidth for multimedia traffic in wireless networks, even with varying channel conditions by an IP/UDP/RTP header a compression gain of 83% and 86% is possible for ROHCv1 and ROHCv2, respectively. While the second version of ROHC is giving generally slightly better compression ratios than the first version, we found situations where the first version performs better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2013.6825044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2013.6825044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文对两种鲁棒报头压缩(ROHC)的实现,即ROHCv1 (RFC 3095)和ROHCv2 (RFC 5225),在无线IP网络的潜在吞吐量增加和复杂性方面进行了评估,并对不同的多媒体流进行了比较。为了将报头信息压缩到最小,RoHCv1在几年前就被提出了,最近RoHCv2已经被提出,与它的前身相比,进行了彻底的重新设计。本文的新颖之处在于介绍了ROHCv2的性能评估以及之前从未发表过的两种方法之间的比较。此外,本文还首次给出了ROHCv2的实际性能测量结果。我们的研究结果表明,这两个版本在节省无线网络多媒体流量带宽方面都有很大的潜力,即使在IP/UDP/RTP报头不同的信道条件下,ROHCv1和ROHCv2的压缩增益分别为83%和86%。虽然第二个版本的ROHC通常比第一个版本提供更好的压缩比,但我们发现第一个版本的性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation and comparison of RObust Header Compression (ROHC) ROHCv1 and ROHCv2 for multimedia delivery
In this paper the two implementations of RObust Header Compression (ROHC), namely ROHCv1 (RFC 3095) and ROHCv2 (RFC 5225), are evaluated in terms of potential throughput increase and complexity for wireless IP networks and compared with each other for different multimedia streams. In order to compress the header information to a minimum, RoHCv1 has been proposed some years back and recently RoHCv2 has been proposed with a complete redesign compared to its predecessor. The novelty of this paper is the presentation of the performance evaluation of ROHCv2 as well as a comparison between the two approaches that have never been published before. In addition, this paper presents real-world performance measurements of ROHCv2 for the first time. Our findings show that both versions have great potential in saving bandwidth for multimedia traffic in wireless networks, even with varying channel conditions by an IP/UDP/RTP header a compression gain of 83% and 86% is possible for ROHCv1 and ROHCv2, respectively. While the second version of ROHC is giving generally slightly better compression ratios than the first version, we found situations where the first version performs better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信