首次安全审计是一个转折点?:工业软件开发团队安全实践的挑战

A. Poller, Laura Kocksch, K. Kinder-Kurlanda, F. A. Epp
{"title":"首次安全审计是一个转折点?:工业软件开发团队安全实践的挑战","authors":"A. Poller, Laura Kocksch, K. Kinder-Kurlanda, F. A. Epp","doi":"10.1145/2851581.2892392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software development is often accompanied by security audits such as penetration tests, usually performed on behalf of the software vendor. In penetration tests security experts identify entry points for attacks in a software product. Many development teams undergo such audits for the first time if their product is attacked or faces new security concerns. The audits often serve as an eye-opener for development teams: they realize that security requires much more attention. However, there is a lack of clarity with regard to what lasting benefits developers can reap from penetration tests. We report from a one-year study of a penetration test run at a major software vendor, and describe how a software development team managed to incorporate the test findings. Results suggest that penetration tests improve developers' security awareness, but that long-lasting enhancements of development practices are hampered by a lack of dedicated security stakeholders and if security is not properly reflected in the communicative and collaborative structures of the organization.","PeriodicalId":285547,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-time Security Audits as a Turning Point?: Challenges for Security Practices in an Industry Software Development Team\",\"authors\":\"A. Poller, Laura Kocksch, K. Kinder-Kurlanda, F. A. Epp\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2851581.2892392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software development is often accompanied by security audits such as penetration tests, usually performed on behalf of the software vendor. In penetration tests security experts identify entry points for attacks in a software product. Many development teams undergo such audits for the first time if their product is attacked or faces new security concerns. The audits often serve as an eye-opener for development teams: they realize that security requires much more attention. However, there is a lack of clarity with regard to what lasting benefits developers can reap from penetration tests. We report from a one-year study of a penetration test run at a major software vendor, and describe how a software development team managed to incorporate the test findings. Results suggest that penetration tests improve developers' security awareness, but that long-lasting enhancements of development practices are hampered by a lack of dedicated security stakeholders and if security is not properly reflected in the communicative and collaborative structures of the organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

软件开发通常伴随着安全审计,例如渗透测试,通常代表软件供应商执行。在渗透测试中,安全专家识别软件产品中的攻击入口点。如果他们的产品受到攻击或面临新的安全问题,许多开发团队都是第一次接受这样的审计。审计通常会让开发团队大开眼界:他们意识到安全性需要更多的关注。然而,对于开发人员可以从渗透测试中获得的持久好处,却缺乏明确的认识。我们报告了在一个主要软件供应商运行的渗透测试的一年研究,并描述了软件开发团队如何设法合并测试结果。结果表明,渗透测试提高了开发人员的安全意识,但是由于缺乏专门的安全涉众,并且如果安全没有在组织的沟通和协作结构中得到适当的反映,那么开发实践的持久增强就会受到阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-time Security Audits as a Turning Point?: Challenges for Security Practices in an Industry Software Development Team
Software development is often accompanied by security audits such as penetration tests, usually performed on behalf of the software vendor. In penetration tests security experts identify entry points for attacks in a software product. Many development teams undergo such audits for the first time if their product is attacked or faces new security concerns. The audits often serve as an eye-opener for development teams: they realize that security requires much more attention. However, there is a lack of clarity with regard to what lasting benefits developers can reap from penetration tests. We report from a one-year study of a penetration test run at a major software vendor, and describe how a software development team managed to incorporate the test findings. Results suggest that penetration tests improve developers' security awareness, but that long-lasting enhancements of development practices are hampered by a lack of dedicated security stakeholders and if security is not properly reflected in the communicative and collaborative structures of the organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信