整合文字处理与写作教学:研究与实践回顾

Amy L. Heebner
{"title":"整合文字处理与写作教学:研究与实践回顾","authors":"Amy L. Heebner","doi":"10.1145/382236.382858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is complex work with physical, cognitive, and social dimensions (Daiute, 1985b). In the days before word processing, writers endured the physical burdens of typing on stiff typewriter keyboards and pushing pencil points. Computer tools such as word processors, electronic mail, and desk top publishing programs dramatically enhanced the physical aspects of writing, and some observers speculated that electronic tools would transform the entire act of writing. Current academic literature suggests that computer tools may indeed affect the writing process as a whole, but that the effect is subtle and difficult to separate from other variables. Researchers have found that young writers are highly enthusiastic about word processors, and that they edit their writing more carefully with word processors than with traditional writing tools. Some teachers and researchers claim that word processing enhances fluency and, indirectly, young writers' design decisions. However, these observations require more extensive investigation in order to qualify as findings. This article focuses on the combination of word processing tools with a process-oriented approach to the teaching of writing, and assumes that these are minimum requirements for a preservice course. However, other computer writing tools could be integrated with this approach. Researchers have described the enthusiastic response of young writers to electronic mail and to electronic publishing programs (Levin, Riel, Miyake, & Cohen, in press; Levin, 1983; Riel, 1983). In order to maximize the value of these computer tools for classroom use, teachers need to understand the cognitive and social aspects of writing in classrooms, as well as the technical requirements of the computer programs they choose.","PeriodicalId":299906,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigcue Outlook","volume":"23 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating word processing with writing instruction: a review of research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Amy L. Heebner\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/382236.382858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing is complex work with physical, cognitive, and social dimensions (Daiute, 1985b). In the days before word processing, writers endured the physical burdens of typing on stiff typewriter keyboards and pushing pencil points. Computer tools such as word processors, electronic mail, and desk top publishing programs dramatically enhanced the physical aspects of writing, and some observers speculated that electronic tools would transform the entire act of writing. Current academic literature suggests that computer tools may indeed affect the writing process as a whole, but that the effect is subtle and difficult to separate from other variables. Researchers have found that young writers are highly enthusiastic about word processors, and that they edit their writing more carefully with word processors than with traditional writing tools. Some teachers and researchers claim that word processing enhances fluency and, indirectly, young writers' design decisions. However, these observations require more extensive investigation in order to qualify as findings. This article focuses on the combination of word processing tools with a process-oriented approach to the teaching of writing, and assumes that these are minimum requirements for a preservice course. However, other computer writing tools could be integrated with this approach. Researchers have described the enthusiastic response of young writers to electronic mail and to electronic publishing programs (Levin, Riel, Miyake, & Cohen, in press; Levin, 1983; Riel, 1983). In order to maximize the value of these computer tools for classroom use, teachers need to understand the cognitive and social aspects of writing in classrooms, as well as the technical requirements of the computer programs they choose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigcue Outlook\",\"volume\":\"23 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigcue Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/382236.382858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigcue Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/382236.382858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

写作是一项复杂的工作,涉及身体、认知和社会维度(Daiute, 1985)。在文字处理出现之前的日子里,作家们忍受着在僵硬的打字机键盘上打字和推铅笔尖的体力负担。诸如文字处理器、电子邮件和桌面出版程序等计算机工具极大地增强了写作的物理方面,一些观察家推测,电子工具将改变整个写作行为。目前的学术文献表明,计算机工具可能确实会影响整个写作过程,但这种影响是微妙的,很难与其他变量分开。研究人员发现,年轻作家对文字处理器非常热衷,他们使用文字处理器比使用传统写作工具更仔细地编辑他们的作品。一些教师和研究人员声称,文字处理可以提高写作的流畅性,并间接提高年轻作家的设计决策。然而,这些观察结果需要更广泛的调查才能成为研究结果。本文重点介绍文字处理工具与面向过程的写作教学方法的结合,并假设这些是职前课程的最低要求。然而,其他计算机写作工具可以与此方法集成。研究人员描述了年轻作家对电子邮件和电子出版程序的热情反应(Levin, Riel, Miyake, & Cohen, in press;莱文,1983;里尔,1983)。为了最大限度地发挥这些计算机工具在课堂上的价值,教师需要了解课堂写作的认知和社会方面,以及他们选择的计算机程序的技术要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating word processing with writing instruction: a review of research and practice
Writing is complex work with physical, cognitive, and social dimensions (Daiute, 1985b). In the days before word processing, writers endured the physical burdens of typing on stiff typewriter keyboards and pushing pencil points. Computer tools such as word processors, electronic mail, and desk top publishing programs dramatically enhanced the physical aspects of writing, and some observers speculated that electronic tools would transform the entire act of writing. Current academic literature suggests that computer tools may indeed affect the writing process as a whole, but that the effect is subtle and difficult to separate from other variables. Researchers have found that young writers are highly enthusiastic about word processors, and that they edit their writing more carefully with word processors than with traditional writing tools. Some teachers and researchers claim that word processing enhances fluency and, indirectly, young writers' design decisions. However, these observations require more extensive investigation in order to qualify as findings. This article focuses on the combination of word processing tools with a process-oriented approach to the teaching of writing, and assumes that these are minimum requirements for a preservice course. However, other computer writing tools could be integrated with this approach. Researchers have described the enthusiastic response of young writers to electronic mail and to electronic publishing programs (Levin, Riel, Miyake, & Cohen, in press; Levin, 1983; Riel, 1983). In order to maximize the value of these computer tools for classroom use, teachers need to understand the cognitive and social aspects of writing in classrooms, as well as the technical requirements of the computer programs they choose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信