{"title":"以多学科共识在制度层面发展专业教育框架","authors":"Chew-Fei Sow, M. Chandratilake, V. Nadarajah","doi":"10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing\nprofessionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to\ncultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various\ndisciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism\nframework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning\nand assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand\nprofessionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of\nprofessionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the\nconsensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core\nvalues and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to\ninclude/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this\nframework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Professionalism Education Framework at the Institutional Level with\\nMultidisciplinary Consensus\",\"authors\":\"Chew-Fei Sow, M. Chandratilake, V. Nadarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing\\nprofessionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to\\ncultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various\\ndisciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism\\nframework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning\\nand assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand\\nprofessionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of\\nprofessionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the\\nconsensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core\\nvalues and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to\\ninclude/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this\\nframework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature\",\"PeriodicalId\":130340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing a Professionalism Education Framework at the Institutional Level with
Multidisciplinary Consensus
The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing
professionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to
cultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various
disciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism
framework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning
and assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand
professionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of
professionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the
consensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core
values and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to
include/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this
framework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature