以多学科共识在制度层面发展专业教育框架

Chew-Fei Sow, M. Chandratilake, V. Nadarajah
{"title":"以多学科共识在制度层面发展专业教育框架","authors":"Chew-Fei Sow, M. Chandratilake, V. Nadarajah","doi":"10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing\nprofessionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to\ncultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various\ndisciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism\nframework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning\nand assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand\nprofessionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of\nprofessionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the\nconsensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core\nvalues and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to\ninclude/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this\nframework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Professionalism Education Framework at the Institutional Level with\\nMultidisciplinary Consensus\",\"authors\":\"Chew-Fei Sow, M. Chandratilake, V. Nadarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing\\nprofessionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to\\ncultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various\\ndisciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism\\nframework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning\\nand assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand\\nprofessionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of\\nprofessionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the\\nconsensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core\\nvalues and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to\\ninclude/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this\\nframework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature\",\"PeriodicalId\":130340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2021.13.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对专业精神定义的不同看法制约了医学课程专业精神的教、学和评价。文献表明,专业精神对文化、社会经济因素敏感,不同学科的医疗保健专业之间存在细微差异。因此,在将专业主义概念化的过程中,有必要在制度层面建立一个专业主义框架,以确保专业主义教学、学习和评估的透明度和一致性。虽然机构可以采用各种方法在其社会文化背景下理解专业主义,但他们需要意识到,由于社会环境的变化,专业主义属性的优先级可能会随着时间的推移而改变。使用共识会议方法,我们描述了一个定义框架,该框架与我们机构的核心价值观和各自的卫生专业计划教育成果相一致,并具有包括/排除和定义/重新定义专业属性的灵活性。灵活性是这个框架的关键区别,它不同于文献中的其他框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Professionalism Education Framework at the Institutional Level with Multidisciplinary Consensus
The varying opinions in defining professionalism have constrained teaching, learning and assessing professionalism in the medical curriculum. The literature shows that professionalism is sensitive to cultural, socio-economic factors with subtle differences between healthcare professions from various disciplines. Therefore, in conceptualising professionalism, there is a need to develop a professionalism framework at an institutional level for the basis of transparency and consistency in teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism. While institutions can adopt various methods to understand professionalism within their sociocultural context, they need to be aware that prioritisation of professionalism attributes may change over time due to changes in the social environment. Using the consensus meeting approach, we describe a defining framework that aligns with our institution’s core values and the respective health professions programme educational outcome with the flexibility to include/exclude and define/redefine professionalism attributes. Flexibility is the key difference in this framework, which is different from other frameworks in the literature
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信