高温高压设备优化分析方法

J. Sims, Jay Lefkowitz, David J. Dewees, C. Becht
{"title":"高温高压设备优化分析方法","authors":"J. Sims, Jay Lefkowitz, David J. Dewees, C. Becht","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The American Petroleum Institute (API) is continuing to develop technical reports, guidelines and standards for the construction of high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) equipment for offshore oil and gas exploration and production. HPHT is considered to be equipment with a pressure rating greater than 103 MPa (15,000 psi) and/or a temperature rating greater than 177°C (350°F). One alternative in the evolving API standards is to use the analysis methodology in ASME Section VIII, Division 3, including fracture mechanics, for determination of the static pressure rating and the design fatigue life. However, detailed requirements for finite element analysis (FEA) parameters such as element type and mesh density are not specified. In addition, specific requirements for fracture mechanics analysis are not provided. This paper explores the effect of variations in those parameters on the calculated static pressure rating and the design fatigue life and gives recommendations for optimizing the parameters of the design itself (e.g. blend radii at transitions) and the analysis considering the required accuracy of the result, analysis time and cost.","PeriodicalId":174920,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Analysis Methodology for HPHT Equipment\",\"authors\":\"J. Sims, Jay Lefkowitz, David J. Dewees, C. Becht\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2019-93901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The American Petroleum Institute (API) is continuing to develop technical reports, guidelines and standards for the construction of high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) equipment for offshore oil and gas exploration and production. HPHT is considered to be equipment with a pressure rating greater than 103 MPa (15,000 psi) and/or a temperature rating greater than 177°C (350°F). One alternative in the evolving API standards is to use the analysis methodology in ASME Section VIII, Division 3, including fracture mechanics, for determination of the static pressure rating and the design fatigue life. However, detailed requirements for finite element analysis (FEA) parameters such as element type and mesh density are not specified. In addition, specific requirements for fracture mechanics analysis are not provided. This paper explores the effect of variations in those parameters on the calculated static pressure rating and the design fatigue life and gives recommendations for optimizing the parameters of the design itself (e.g. blend radii at transitions) and the analysis considering the required accuracy of the result, analysis time and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国石油协会(API)正在继续制定用于海上油气勘探和生产的高压、高温(HPHT)设备的技术报告、指南和标准。高压高压被认为是额定压力大于103 MPa (15,000 psi)和/或额定温度大于177°C(350°F)的设备。在不断发展的API标准中,另一种选择是使用ASME第VIII节第3部分的分析方法,包括断裂力学,来确定静压等级和设计疲劳寿命。然而,对有限元分析(FEA)参数(如单元类型和网格密度)的详细要求没有规定。此外,没有提供断裂力学分析的具体要求。本文探讨了这些参数的变化对计算的静压额定值和设计疲劳寿命的影响,并提出了优化设计本身的参数(例如过渡时的混合半径)和考虑结果精度、分析时间和成本的分析建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Analysis Methodology for HPHT Equipment
The American Petroleum Institute (API) is continuing to develop technical reports, guidelines and standards for the construction of high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) equipment for offshore oil and gas exploration and production. HPHT is considered to be equipment with a pressure rating greater than 103 MPa (15,000 psi) and/or a temperature rating greater than 177°C (350°F). One alternative in the evolving API standards is to use the analysis methodology in ASME Section VIII, Division 3, including fracture mechanics, for determination of the static pressure rating and the design fatigue life. However, detailed requirements for finite element analysis (FEA) parameters such as element type and mesh density are not specified. In addition, specific requirements for fracture mechanics analysis are not provided. This paper explores the effect of variations in those parameters on the calculated static pressure rating and the design fatigue life and gives recommendations for optimizing the parameters of the design itself (e.g. blend radii at transitions) and the analysis considering the required accuracy of the result, analysis time and cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信