政策制定的背景弹性:资本利得和收入最大化税率

T. Dowd, Z. Richards
{"title":"政策制定的背景弹性:资本利得和收入最大化税率","authors":"T. Dowd, Z. Richards","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3767121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital gains revenue estimates rely on a long history of research empirically estimating the tax elasticity of capital gains realizations. These elasticity estimates have varied from zero to well over 3 in absolute value depending on numerous factors, such as the time frame studied, the type of capital asset, and the estimation strategy employed. Often, the headline elasticity from a study of this nature is used to calculate the implied revenue-maximizing capital gains tax rate. Unfortunately, this last, policy-relevant step has received insufficient scrutiny. The standard approach fails to sufficiently acknowledge that the estimates of the revenue-maximizing rate are a product of the estimation procedure used and the context of the tax system from which the data were generated. Such an approach yields a single capital gains tax rate which applies to all realized gains and mechanically overstates the resulting revenue-maximizing rate.","PeriodicalId":428959,"journal":{"name":"Household Finance eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextualizing Elasticities for Policymaking: Capital Gains and Revenue-Maximizing Tax Rates\",\"authors\":\"T. Dowd, Z. Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3767121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capital gains revenue estimates rely on a long history of research empirically estimating the tax elasticity of capital gains realizations. These elasticity estimates have varied from zero to well over 3 in absolute value depending on numerous factors, such as the time frame studied, the type of capital asset, and the estimation strategy employed. Often, the headline elasticity from a study of this nature is used to calculate the implied revenue-maximizing capital gains tax rate. Unfortunately, this last, policy-relevant step has received insufficient scrutiny. The standard approach fails to sufficiently acknowledge that the estimates of the revenue-maximizing rate are a product of the estimation procedure used and the context of the tax system from which the data were generated. Such an approach yields a single capital gains tax rate which applies to all realized gains and mechanically overstates the resulting revenue-maximizing rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Household Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Household Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3767121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Household Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3767121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

资本利得收入估计依赖于长期的研究历史经验估计资本利得实现的税收弹性。这些弹性估计的绝对值从0到超过3不等,这取决于许多因素,例如研究的时间框架、资本资产的类型和所采用的估计策略。通常,这种性质的研究的标题弹性被用来计算隐含的收入最大化资本利得税率。不幸的是,最后这一与政策相关的步骤没有得到足够的审查。标准方法没有充分认识到,对收入最大化率的估计是所使用的估计程序和产生数据的税收制度背景的产物。这种方法产生了单一的资本利得税率,适用于所有已实现的收益,并机械地夸大了由此产生的收入最大化税率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contextualizing Elasticities for Policymaking: Capital Gains and Revenue-Maximizing Tax Rates
Capital gains revenue estimates rely on a long history of research empirically estimating the tax elasticity of capital gains realizations. These elasticity estimates have varied from zero to well over 3 in absolute value depending on numerous factors, such as the time frame studied, the type of capital asset, and the estimation strategy employed. Often, the headline elasticity from a study of this nature is used to calculate the implied revenue-maximizing capital gains tax rate. Unfortunately, this last, policy-relevant step has received insufficient scrutiny. The standard approach fails to sufficiently acknowledge that the estimates of the revenue-maximizing rate are a product of the estimation procedure used and the context of the tax system from which the data were generated. Such an approach yields a single capital gains tax rate which applies to all realized gains and mechanically overstates the resulting revenue-maximizing rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信