组织激进的海运工人

{"title":"组织激进的海运工人","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004463288_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maritime workers constituted a multifaceted group, e.g. the seamen and stokers of many nationalities hired on the various national merchant fleets as well as the dockers and stevedores working in the harbours. Working conditions both on board and on land were tough and worsened due to the economic depression from the late 1920s onwards. The organisation of seamen in trade unions, especially, was a challenge as union activity was mainly landbased while seamen worked on ships that seldom called at their homeports. In addition, seamen were for long regarded as an unruly, individualistic and internationalist group who had few interests in organised union activities. Socialist party and labour leaders regarded the waterfront as a secondary field of work – in sheer numbers, the maritime workers constituted but a small portion of the work force.1 Also, as Peter Cole and David Featherstone have underlined, apart from the 1913established Marine Transport Workers’ Industrial Union, the official maritime labour unions in the USA, Britain and elsewhere where preominantly exclusionary and segregationist.2 It comes therefore as no surprise that many of the leading figures in the radical waterfront both in Europe and the Americas had a background in the ‘revolutionary industrial unionism’ and the radical international syndicalism of the ‘Wobblies’, the Industrial Workers of the World, before and during the Great War.3 A further challenge were the unemployed seamen living ashore. Especially during the 1920s and 1930s, they constituted a problematic group for the existing socialistled maritime labour unions: receptive for radical, i.e., communist, agitation and propaganda, they could turn into a ‘fifth column’ at union meetings and push for a politicisation of trade union activities.","PeriodicalId":142090,"journal":{"name":"A Global Radical Waterfront","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organising the Radical Maritime Transport Workers\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004463288_004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maritime workers constituted a multifaceted group, e.g. the seamen and stokers of many nationalities hired on the various national merchant fleets as well as the dockers and stevedores working in the harbours. Working conditions both on board and on land were tough and worsened due to the economic depression from the late 1920s onwards. The organisation of seamen in trade unions, especially, was a challenge as union activity was mainly landbased while seamen worked on ships that seldom called at their homeports. In addition, seamen were for long regarded as an unruly, individualistic and internationalist group who had few interests in organised union activities. Socialist party and labour leaders regarded the waterfront as a secondary field of work – in sheer numbers, the maritime workers constituted but a small portion of the work force.1 Also, as Peter Cole and David Featherstone have underlined, apart from the 1913established Marine Transport Workers’ Industrial Union, the official maritime labour unions in the USA, Britain and elsewhere where preominantly exclusionary and segregationist.2 It comes therefore as no surprise that many of the leading figures in the radical waterfront both in Europe and the Americas had a background in the ‘revolutionary industrial unionism’ and the radical international syndicalism of the ‘Wobblies’, the Industrial Workers of the World, before and during the Great War.3 A further challenge were the unemployed seamen living ashore. Especially during the 1920s and 1930s, they constituted a problematic group for the existing socialistled maritime labour unions: receptive for radical, i.e., communist, agitation and propaganda, they could turn into a ‘fifth column’ at union meetings and push for a politicisation of trade union activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Global Radical Waterfront\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Global Radical Waterfront\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004463288_004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Global Radical Waterfront","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004463288_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海事工人是一个多元化的群体,例如受雇于各国商船队的许多国籍的海员和加炉工,以及在港口工作的码头工人和装卸工人。由于20世纪20年代末以来的经济萧条,船上和陆地上的工作条件都很艰苦,而且更糟。海员在工会中的组织尤其具有挑战性,因为工会活动主要是在陆地上进行的,而海员在很少停靠母港的船上工作。此外,海员长期以来被认为是一个不守规矩、个人主义和国际主义的群体,他们对有组织的工会活动几乎没有兴趣。社会党和劳工领袖把海滨地区视为次要的工作领域——就绝对数量而言,海事工人只占劳动力的一小部分此外,正如彼得·科尔和大卫·费瑟斯通所强调的那样,除了1913年成立的海运工人产业工会外,美国、英国和其他地方的官方海事工会主要是排他性的和种族隔离主义者因此,毫不奇怪,在欧洲和美洲的激进滨水区,许多领导人物都有“革命工业工会主义”和“世界产业工人”的激进国际工团主义背景,在第一次世界大战之前和期间。3进一步的挑战是生活在岸上的失业海员。特别是在20世纪20年代和30年代,他们对现有的社会主义海事工会构成了一个有问题的群体:接受激进的,即共产主义的鼓动和宣传,他们可以在工会会议上变成“第五纵队”,推动工会活动的政治化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organising the Radical Maritime Transport Workers
Maritime workers constituted a multifaceted group, e.g. the seamen and stokers of many nationalities hired on the various national merchant fleets as well as the dockers and stevedores working in the harbours. Working conditions both on board and on land were tough and worsened due to the economic depression from the late 1920s onwards. The organisation of seamen in trade unions, especially, was a challenge as union activity was mainly landbased while seamen worked on ships that seldom called at their homeports. In addition, seamen were for long regarded as an unruly, individualistic and internationalist group who had few interests in organised union activities. Socialist party and labour leaders regarded the waterfront as a secondary field of work – in sheer numbers, the maritime workers constituted but a small portion of the work force.1 Also, as Peter Cole and David Featherstone have underlined, apart from the 1913established Marine Transport Workers’ Industrial Union, the official maritime labour unions in the USA, Britain and elsewhere where preominantly exclusionary and segregationist.2 It comes therefore as no surprise that many of the leading figures in the radical waterfront both in Europe and the Americas had a background in the ‘revolutionary industrial unionism’ and the radical international syndicalism of the ‘Wobblies’, the Industrial Workers of the World, before and during the Great War.3 A further challenge were the unemployed seamen living ashore. Especially during the 1920s and 1930s, they constituted a problematic group for the existing socialistled maritime labour unions: receptive for radical, i.e., communist, agitation and propaganda, they could turn into a ‘fifth column’ at union meetings and push for a politicisation of trade union activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信