中美班级PBL比较

Yuh-Mei Chen, Yilun Wang, Qing Ye, Zhihao Zhou
{"title":"中美班级PBL比较","authors":"Yuh-Mei Chen, Yilun Wang, Qing Ye, Zhihao Zhou","doi":"10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem-based learning (PBL) is a teaching model which has been widely applied in class throughout the world. PBL originated in America and developed systematically in western countries. To further the PBL development in China, this paper mainly makes comparison of PBL in class between China and America based on two authentic PBL class cases and finds out that PBL classes differ in process monitoring, project setting, and evaluation of works. At the same time, they are similar in the diversified assignments, project duration, and creative thinking skills. By analyzing these points, this research has three main findings :(1)The American case favors project-based learning more, whereas the Chinese case emphasizes problem-based learning; (2)When delivering the curriculum, it is crucial for teachers to strike a balance between PBL and related subjects, and obstacles, length, or materials should also be taken into account. ; (3)Group collaboration is the primary means of reducing the management challenge in PBL teaching, and strengthening PBL teaching management is a link in the teaching process. The paper contributes to helping teachers who are committed to PBL adopt the good points and avoid shortcomings of the lesson plan and project design.","PeriodicalId":173879,"journal":{"name":"BCP Education & Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing PBL between China and America Class\",\"authors\":\"Yuh-Mei Chen, Yilun Wang, Qing Ye, Zhihao Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem-based learning (PBL) is a teaching model which has been widely applied in class throughout the world. PBL originated in America and developed systematically in western countries. To further the PBL development in China, this paper mainly makes comparison of PBL in class between China and America based on two authentic PBL class cases and finds out that PBL classes differ in process monitoring, project setting, and evaluation of works. At the same time, they are similar in the diversified assignments, project duration, and creative thinking skills. By analyzing these points, this research has three main findings :(1)The American case favors project-based learning more, whereas the Chinese case emphasizes problem-based learning; (2)When delivering the curriculum, it is crucial for teachers to strike a balance between PBL and related subjects, and obstacles, length, or materials should also be taken into account. ; (3)Group collaboration is the primary means of reducing the management challenge in PBL teaching, and strengthening PBL teaching management is a link in the teaching process. The paper contributes to helping teachers who are committed to PBL adopt the good points and avoid shortcomings of the lesson plan and project design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCP Education & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCP Education & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCP Education & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种在世界范围内得到广泛应用的课堂教学模式。PBL起源于美国,在西方国家有系统地发展。为了进一步推动PBL在中国的发展,本文主要基于两个真实的PBL课堂案例,对中美两国的PBL课堂进行比较,发现PBL课堂在过程监控、项目设置和作品评价等方面存在差异。同时,他们在任务的多样化、项目的持续时间、创造性思维能力等方面都是相似的。通过分析这些观点,本研究有三个主要发现:(1)美国案例更倾向于基于项目的学习,而中国案例更倾向于基于问题的学习;(2)教师在实施课程时,在PBL与相关学科之间取得平衡至关重要,同时也要考虑障碍、长度或材料。; (3)小组协作是减少PBL教学管理挑战的主要手段,加强PBL教学管理是教学过程中的一个环节。本文旨在帮助致力于PBL教学的教师吸取教案和项目设计的优点,避免不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing PBL between China and America Class
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a teaching model which has been widely applied in class throughout the world. PBL originated in America and developed systematically in western countries. To further the PBL development in China, this paper mainly makes comparison of PBL in class between China and America based on two authentic PBL class cases and finds out that PBL classes differ in process monitoring, project setting, and evaluation of works. At the same time, they are similar in the diversified assignments, project duration, and creative thinking skills. By analyzing these points, this research has three main findings :(1)The American case favors project-based learning more, whereas the Chinese case emphasizes problem-based learning; (2)When delivering the curriculum, it is crucial for teachers to strike a balance between PBL and related subjects, and obstacles, length, or materials should also be taken into account. ; (3)Group collaboration is the primary means of reducing the management challenge in PBL teaching, and strengthening PBL teaching management is a link in the teaching process. The paper contributes to helping teachers who are committed to PBL adopt the good points and avoid shortcomings of the lesson plan and project design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信