考虑低碳政策的多级供应链减排决策研究

Yeliang Sun, Dong Mu, Qian Zhang
{"title":"考虑低碳政策的多级供应链减排决策研究","authors":"Yeliang Sun, Dong Mu, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1109/LISS.2015.7369774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along with the trend of low-carbon development, the government adopts a series of measures to control carbon emissions. Here, in the case with constraint of carbon cap and both firms and consumers have low carbon preference, we study the firm production decision problems in a supply chain consists of three firms The latest-firm-dominant situation is discussed by using Stackelberg game and we obtain the optimal output and emission reductions by the converse solution method. It shows that the optimal reduction decision of a firm is to make its marginal emission reduction cost slightly larger than purchase the corresponding emission rights from the carbon transaction market. The emission reduction of one side in a supply chain will motivate the others in the supply chain. With the enhancement of consumer low-carbon preference, the sales price will rise and lead to profits rise of the whole supply chain, but not all firms are profits benefit. Based on the above analysis, we extend the model to n firms aims to make some guideline sense for supply chain firms launching cooperation in areas of emission reduction.","PeriodicalId":124091,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on emission reduction decisions in multi-echelon supply chain with low-carbon policy considered\",\"authors\":\"Yeliang Sun, Dong Mu, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LISS.2015.7369774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Along with the trend of low-carbon development, the government adopts a series of measures to control carbon emissions. Here, in the case with constraint of carbon cap and both firms and consumers have low carbon preference, we study the firm production decision problems in a supply chain consists of three firms The latest-firm-dominant situation is discussed by using Stackelberg game and we obtain the optimal output and emission reductions by the converse solution method. It shows that the optimal reduction decision of a firm is to make its marginal emission reduction cost slightly larger than purchase the corresponding emission rights from the carbon transaction market. The emission reduction of one side in a supply chain will motivate the others in the supply chain. With the enhancement of consumer low-carbon preference, the sales price will rise and lead to profits rise of the whole supply chain, but not all firms are profits benefit. Based on the above analysis, we extend the model to n firms aims to make some guideline sense for supply chain firms launching cooperation in areas of emission reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2015.7369774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2015.7369774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着低碳发展的趋势,政府采取了一系列措施来控制碳排放。本文研究了在有碳限额约束、企业和消费者都具有低碳偏好的情况下,由三家企业组成的供应链上的企业生产决策问题,利用Stackelberg博弈讨论了最新的企业优势情况,并利用逆解方法得到了最优的产量和减排量。研究表明,企业的最优减排决策是使其边际减排成本略大于从碳交易市场购买相应的排放权。供应链中一方的减排将激励供应链中的其他方。随着消费者低碳偏好的增强,销售价格会上升,导致整个供应链的利润上升,但并不是所有的企业都获利。在此基础上,我们将模型扩展到n家企业,以期对供应链企业开展减排合作具有一定的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on emission reduction decisions in multi-echelon supply chain with low-carbon policy considered
Along with the trend of low-carbon development, the government adopts a series of measures to control carbon emissions. Here, in the case with constraint of carbon cap and both firms and consumers have low carbon preference, we study the firm production decision problems in a supply chain consists of three firms The latest-firm-dominant situation is discussed by using Stackelberg game and we obtain the optimal output and emission reductions by the converse solution method. It shows that the optimal reduction decision of a firm is to make its marginal emission reduction cost slightly larger than purchase the corresponding emission rights from the carbon transaction market. The emission reduction of one side in a supply chain will motivate the others in the supply chain. With the enhancement of consumer low-carbon preference, the sales price will rise and lead to profits rise of the whole supply chain, but not all firms are profits benefit. Based on the above analysis, we extend the model to n firms aims to make some guideline sense for supply chain firms launching cooperation in areas of emission reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信