牙科放射学诊断参考水平:系统综述

Alenka Matjašič
{"title":"牙科放射学诊断参考水平:系统综述","authors":"Alenka Matjašič","doi":"10.47724/mirtj.2021.i02.a003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this work was to review published articles in the fi eld of diagnostic reference levels in dental radiology, and to determine which areas have not been covered yet and require further scientifi c studies. The aim was also to determine if there are any dose optimization procedures suggested after DRL establishment. Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed using the Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source (via EBSCOhost) databases, following the Cochrane Network study design guidelines. Articles were analysed and presented by author, year of publication, country of origin, technology (e.g. digital radiography, computed radiography and fi lm-screen), radiographic type (e.g. intraoral, panoramic and CBCT), units of measurement and main conclusions for each study. Results: Thirteen scientifi c articles on dose reference values in dental radiology were evaluated. Full-access articles published between 2001 and 2021 were used, and both reviews and original research articles were included. The studies address the defi nition or analysis of DRLs in intraoral and panoramic dental imaging and in dental CBCT imaging. Many studies report results based on diff erent image-receiving systems (e.g. DR, CR and fi lm-screen). The fi lm-screen system yielded the highest dose values of all three systems. All studies reviewed describe DRLs for the adult population, while only four also describe paediatric DRLs. Conclusion: Most EU countries have not yet set national DRLs for dental radiology. Most studies set or revise DRLs at the national level and compare them with guidelines from literature and from similar studies conducted in other countries. Most of these studies observed DRLs in the adult population. DRLs should also be set in the fi eld of dental CBCT imaging, as the use of this technology is rapidly increasing and the dose levels are incomparably higher than in general dental radiography. Keywords: dental radiography, diagnostic reference levels, intraoral imaging, panoramic dental imaging.","PeriodicalId":271343,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Alenka Matjašič\",\"doi\":\"10.47724/mirtj.2021.i02.a003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this work was to review published articles in the fi eld of diagnostic reference levels in dental radiology, and to determine which areas have not been covered yet and require further scientifi c studies. The aim was also to determine if there are any dose optimization procedures suggested after DRL establishment. Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed using the Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source (via EBSCOhost) databases, following the Cochrane Network study design guidelines. Articles were analysed and presented by author, year of publication, country of origin, technology (e.g. digital radiography, computed radiography and fi lm-screen), radiographic type (e.g. intraoral, panoramic and CBCT), units of measurement and main conclusions for each study. Results: Thirteen scientifi c articles on dose reference values in dental radiology were evaluated. Full-access articles published between 2001 and 2021 were used, and both reviews and original research articles were included. The studies address the defi nition or analysis of DRLs in intraoral and panoramic dental imaging and in dental CBCT imaging. Many studies report results based on diff erent image-receiving systems (e.g. DR, CR and fi lm-screen). The fi lm-screen system yielded the highest dose values of all three systems. All studies reviewed describe DRLs for the adult population, while only four also describe paediatric DRLs. Conclusion: Most EU countries have not yet set national DRLs for dental radiology. Most studies set or revise DRLs at the national level and compare them with guidelines from literature and from similar studies conducted in other countries. Most of these studies observed DRLs in the adult population. DRLs should also be set in the fi eld of dental CBCT imaging, as the use of this technology is rapidly increasing and the dose levels are incomparably higher than in general dental radiography. Keywords: dental radiography, diagnostic reference levels, intraoral imaging, panoramic dental imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47724/mirtj.2021.i02.a003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47724/mirtj.2021.i02.a003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本工作的目的是回顾在牙科放射学诊断参考水平领域发表的文章,并确定哪些领域尚未被涵盖,需要进一步的科学研究。目的还在于确定在DRL建立后是否存在建议的剂量优化程序。材料和方法:根据Cochrane网络研究设计指南,使用Science Direct、PubMed、CINAHL(通过EBSCOhost)和Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source(通过EBSCOhost)数据库进行系统评价。文章按作者、出版年份、原产国、技术(如数字放射照相、计算机放射照相和胶片屏幕)、放射照相类型(如口内、全景和CBCT)、测量单位和每项研究的主要结论进行分析和呈现。结果:对13篇有关口腔放射学剂量参考值的文献进行了评价。使用了2001年至2021年间发表的完整获取文章,包括综述和原创研究文章。这些研究讨论了口腔内、口腔全景成像和牙科CBCT成像中drl的定义或分析。许多研究报告了基于不同图像接收系统(如DR, CR和film -screen)的结果。在所有三种系统中,薄膜屏系统产生的剂量值最高。所有被回顾的研究都描述了成人的drl,而只有四项研究描述了儿科的drl。结论:大多数欧盟国家尚未制定国家口腔放射学的国家级drl。大多数研究在国家层面制定或修订drl,并将其与文献指南和其他国家进行的类似研究进行比较。这些研究大多在成年人中观察到drl。在牙科CBCT成像领域也应该设置drl,因为这项技术的使用正在迅速增加,剂量水平远远高于普通牙科x线摄影。关键词:口腔x线摄影,诊断参考水平,口腔内成像,口腔全景成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to review published articles in the fi eld of diagnostic reference levels in dental radiology, and to determine which areas have not been covered yet and require further scientifi c studies. The aim was also to determine if there are any dose optimization procedures suggested after DRL establishment. Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed using the Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source (via EBSCOhost) databases, following the Cochrane Network study design guidelines. Articles were analysed and presented by author, year of publication, country of origin, technology (e.g. digital radiography, computed radiography and fi lm-screen), radiographic type (e.g. intraoral, panoramic and CBCT), units of measurement and main conclusions for each study. Results: Thirteen scientifi c articles on dose reference values in dental radiology were evaluated. Full-access articles published between 2001 and 2021 were used, and both reviews and original research articles were included. The studies address the defi nition or analysis of DRLs in intraoral and panoramic dental imaging and in dental CBCT imaging. Many studies report results based on diff erent image-receiving systems (e.g. DR, CR and fi lm-screen). The fi lm-screen system yielded the highest dose values of all three systems. All studies reviewed describe DRLs for the adult population, while only four also describe paediatric DRLs. Conclusion: Most EU countries have not yet set national DRLs for dental radiology. Most studies set or revise DRLs at the national level and compare them with guidelines from literature and from similar studies conducted in other countries. Most of these studies observed DRLs in the adult population. DRLs should also be set in the fi eld of dental CBCT imaging, as the use of this technology is rapidly increasing and the dose levels are incomparably higher than in general dental radiography. Keywords: dental radiography, diagnostic reference levels, intraoral imaging, panoramic dental imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信