{"title":"宇宙学的历史偶然性[1]——在托勒密模型和哥白尼模型之间的选择","authors":"Yeuncheol Jeong","doi":"10.52267/ijaser.2022.3302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Scientific Revolution, Copernican Sun-centered Universe had replaced Ptolemy’s Earth-centered Universe. However, this was not made possible due to scientific rationality and objectivity based on the best available sets of empirical evidence at the time. The transition from Ptolemy’s to Copernican model was aesthetic and psychological in nature rather than rational and objective.","PeriodicalId":153802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HISTORICAL CONTINGENCIES FOR COSMOLOGY [1] -A CHOICE BETWEEN PTOLEMY’S AND COPERNICAN MODEL\",\"authors\":\"Yeuncheol Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.52267/ijaser.2022.3302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the Scientific Revolution, Copernican Sun-centered Universe had replaced Ptolemy’s Earth-centered Universe. However, this was not made possible due to scientific rationality and objectivity based on the best available sets of empirical evidence at the time. The transition from Ptolemy’s to Copernican model was aesthetic and psychological in nature rather than rational and objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52267/ijaser.2022.3302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52267/ijaser.2022.3302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
HISTORICAL CONTINGENCIES FOR COSMOLOGY [1] -A CHOICE BETWEEN PTOLEMY’S AND COPERNICAN MODEL
During the Scientific Revolution, Copernican Sun-centered Universe had replaced Ptolemy’s Earth-centered Universe. However, this was not made possible due to scientific rationality and objectivity based on the best available sets of empirical evidence at the time. The transition from Ptolemy’s to Copernican model was aesthetic and psychological in nature rather than rational and objective.