英国新自由主义和紧缩政策的女权主义分析

R. Pearson
{"title":"英国新自由主义和紧缩政策的女权主义分析","authors":"R. Pearson","doi":"10.3898/SOUN.71.02.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Economic decisions-such as where investment is increased and or withdrawn, which services will flourish and which will be run down, whose living standards will be protected or boosted and whose reduced-are not gender neutral. Neoliberal policies in particular have disproportionately affected women, particularly lowincome and BAME women, through their lack of interest in social investment and the cuts they are making to the resources and public services that sustain life. They treat women's unpaid labour as an expandable and costless resource that can absorb all the extra work that results from these cuts. This article discusses some of these effects, drawing in particular on data from the Women's Budget Group and work by feminist political economists. It also makes the case for investment in the social infrastructure as an engine of sustainable economic growth, and argues against a focus solely on investment in physical infrastructure and the creation of paid employment.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feminist analysis of neoliberalism and austerity policies in the UK\",\"authors\":\"R. Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/SOUN.71.02.2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Economic decisions-such as where investment is increased and or withdrawn, which services will flourish and which will be run down, whose living standards will be protected or boosted and whose reduced-are not gender neutral. Neoliberal policies in particular have disproportionately affected women, particularly lowincome and BAME women, through their lack of interest in social investment and the cuts they are making to the resources and public services that sustain life. They treat women's unpaid labour as an expandable and costless resource that can absorb all the extra work that results from these cuts. This article discusses some of these effects, drawing in particular on data from the Women's Budget Group and work by feminist political economists. It also makes the case for investment in the social infrastructure as an engine of sustainable economic growth, and argues against a focus solely on investment in physical infrastructure and the creation of paid employment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.71.02.2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.71.02.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

摘要:经济决策——例如增加或减少投资,哪些服务将蓬勃发展,哪些服务将减少,哪些人的生活水平将得到保护或提高,哪些人的生活水平将降低——并不是性别中立的。新自由主义政策对妇女的影响尤其严重,尤其是低收入妇女和BAME妇女,因为她们对社会投资缺乏兴趣,并且削减了维持生活的资源和公共服务。他们将妇女的无偿劳动视为一种可扩展和无成本的资源,可以吸收因这些削减而产生的所有额外工作。本文讨论了其中的一些影响,特别引用了妇女预算小组的数据和女权主义政治经济学家的工作。它还论证了社会基础设施投资是可持续经济增长的引擎,反对只关注有形基础设施投资和创造有偿就业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A feminist analysis of neoliberalism and austerity policies in the UK
Abstract:Economic decisions-such as where investment is increased and or withdrawn, which services will flourish and which will be run down, whose living standards will be protected or boosted and whose reduced-are not gender neutral. Neoliberal policies in particular have disproportionately affected women, particularly lowincome and BAME women, through their lack of interest in social investment and the cuts they are making to the resources and public services that sustain life. They treat women's unpaid labour as an expandable and costless resource that can absorb all the extra work that results from these cuts. This article discusses some of these effects, drawing in particular on data from the Women's Budget Group and work by feminist political economists. It also makes the case for investment in the social infrastructure as an engine of sustainable economic growth, and argues against a focus solely on investment in physical infrastructure and the creation of paid employment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信