{"title":"商用可靠性预测方案的比较","authors":"J. Bowles, L. A. Klein","doi":"10.1109/ARMS.1990.68000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussed are demonstration versions of six reliability prediction software packages: FRATE, MilStress, PC Predictor, REAPmate, ReCalc 2 and RELEX. The programs are compared on the basis of price, data-input process, output-reporting options, error handling, user friendliness, and other options. No attempt is made to rank the programs in any way since any such ranking is highly dependent on the user's perspective and needs. Overall, the programs have many advanced features and provide powerful tools for assessing the reliability of a design.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":383597,"journal":{"name":"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of commercial reliability prediction programs\",\"authors\":\"J. Bowles, L. A. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARMS.1990.68000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussed are demonstration versions of six reliability prediction software packages: FRATE, MilStress, PC Predictor, REAPmate, ReCalc 2 and RELEX. The programs are compared on the basis of price, data-input process, output-reporting options, error handling, user friendliness, and other options. No attempt is made to rank the programs in any way since any such ranking is highly dependent on the user's perspective and needs. Overall, the programs have many advanced features and provide powerful tools for assessing the reliability of a design.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":383597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1990.68000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1990.68000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
讨论了六个可靠性预测软件包的演示版本:FRATE, MilStress, PC Predictor, REAPmate, ReCalc 2和RELEX。这些程序在价格、数据输入过程、输出报告选项、错误处理、用户友好性和其他选项的基础上进行比较。没有尝试以任何方式对程序进行排名，因为任何此类排名都高度依赖于用户的观点和需求。总的来说，这些程序具有许多先进的功能，并为评估设计的可靠性提供了强大的工具。
A comparison of commercial reliability prediction programs
Discussed are demonstration versions of six reliability prediction software packages: FRATE, MilStress, PC Predictor, REAPmate, ReCalc 2 and RELEX. The programs are compared on the basis of price, data-input process, output-reporting options, error handling, user friendliness, and other options. No attempt is made to rank the programs in any way since any such ranking is highly dependent on the user's perspective and needs. Overall, the programs have many advanced features and provide powerful tools for assessing the reliability of a design.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
