运用宏观工效学方法开发工作场所检查的综合人为因素和工效学检查表

Shalinda Shafie, Shamsul Bahri Mohd Tamrin, Ng Yee Guan, Dayana Hazwani Mohd Suadi Nata
{"title":"运用宏观工效学方法开发工作场所检查的综合人为因素和工效学检查表","authors":"Shalinda Shafie, Shamsul Bahri Mohd Tamrin, Ng Yee Guan, Dayana Hazwani Mohd Suadi Nata","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lack of time and manpower as well as a fragmented inspection process are some of the challenges faced by industrial hygiene inspectors from the Malaysian Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) in carrying out their duties especially regarding industrial hygiene and ergonomics related workplace inspections. To streamline the inspection process and ensure a comprehensive assessment of the workplace, a study was carried out to develop a comprehensive Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) checklist. To our knowledge, there is no publicly available checklist covering all three ergonomics domains (physical, cognitive and organizational) that is designed to facilitate workplace inspection and regulatory enforcement process by industrial hygienists and inspectors.The study was divided into several phases. During the first phase, a literature review was carried out looking at existing checklists, assessment methods and industrial hygiene and ergonomics standards that fell within the scope of our study. During this phase, the applicable local regulations and current enforcement methods by inspectors were also analyzed. Based on this a draft checklist was developed. The checklist utilizes a macroergonomics approach where the different socio-technical components of the work system are assessed: the design of each task, the personnel carrying out the task, the physical environment the task is being carried out as well as the management systems and culture of the organization. To encourage a more holistic approach to assessing HFE, the checklist also borrows techniques from diverse fields outside of industrial hygiene such as human error engineering, organizational psychology, and industrial design.The second phase of the study involved multiple discussion sessions with DOSH inspectors, academics and professionals in various fields and industry to further refine the checklist so that it can be used both by inspectors carrying out workplace inspections as well industrial hygienists and safety practitioners to identify areas for improvement in their own workplaces. The checklist was also tested at by safety practitioners at 2 workplaces and by DOSH inspectors at 7 workplaces. During the tests, both regulatory inspectors and industry safety practitioners gave positive feedback on the approach and scope of the checklist. The inclusion of lesser-known elements related to cognitive ergonomics and organizational psychology were well-received even though these are not explicitly regulated by local law. However, since a macroergonomics approach was used in the checklist, there were concerns raised regarding the level of detail and time required to complete the checklist.The checklist is still being developed and the next phase of the project which will start in 2023 includes a Pilot Program where in-depth testing of the checklist will be undertaken at multiple workplaces in different industries throughout the country.","PeriodicalId":130337,"journal":{"name":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Comprehensive Human Factor and Ergonomics Checklist for Workplace Inspections Using a Macroergonomics Approach\",\"authors\":\"Shalinda Shafie, Shamsul Bahri Mohd Tamrin, Ng Yee Guan, Dayana Hazwani Mohd Suadi Nata\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lack of time and manpower as well as a fragmented inspection process are some of the challenges faced by industrial hygiene inspectors from the Malaysian Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) in carrying out their duties especially regarding industrial hygiene and ergonomics related workplace inspections. To streamline the inspection process and ensure a comprehensive assessment of the workplace, a study was carried out to develop a comprehensive Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) checklist. To our knowledge, there is no publicly available checklist covering all three ergonomics domains (physical, cognitive and organizational) that is designed to facilitate workplace inspection and regulatory enforcement process by industrial hygienists and inspectors.The study was divided into several phases. During the first phase, a literature review was carried out looking at existing checklists, assessment methods and industrial hygiene and ergonomics standards that fell within the scope of our study. During this phase, the applicable local regulations and current enforcement methods by inspectors were also analyzed. Based on this a draft checklist was developed. The checklist utilizes a macroergonomics approach where the different socio-technical components of the work system are assessed: the design of each task, the personnel carrying out the task, the physical environment the task is being carried out as well as the management systems and culture of the organization. To encourage a more holistic approach to assessing HFE, the checklist also borrows techniques from diverse fields outside of industrial hygiene such as human error engineering, organizational psychology, and industrial design.The second phase of the study involved multiple discussion sessions with DOSH inspectors, academics and professionals in various fields and industry to further refine the checklist so that it can be used both by inspectors carrying out workplace inspections as well industrial hygienists and safety practitioners to identify areas for improvement in their own workplaces. The checklist was also tested at by safety practitioners at 2 workplaces and by DOSH inspectors at 7 workplaces. During the tests, both regulatory inspectors and industry safety practitioners gave positive feedback on the approach and scope of the checklist. The inclusion of lesser-known elements related to cognitive ergonomics and organizational psychology were well-received even though these are not explicitly regulated by local law. However, since a macroergonomics approach was used in the checklist, there were concerns raised regarding the level of detail and time required to complete the checklist.The checklist is still being developed and the next phase of the project which will start in 2023 includes a Pilot Program where in-depth testing of the checklist will be undertaken at multiple workplaces in different industries throughout the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马来西亚职业安全与健康部(DOSH)的工业卫生检查员在履行职责时,特别是在工业卫生和人体工程学相关的工作场所检查方面,面临着缺乏时间和人力以及支离破碎的检查过程的一些挑战。为简化检查程序及确保对工作场所进行全面评估,我们进行了一项研究,以制订一份全面的人因及工效学核对表。据我们所知,没有公开可用的清单涵盖所有三个人体工程学领域(物理,认知和组织),旨在促进工业卫生学家和检查员的工作场所检查和监管执行过程。这项研究分为几个阶段。在第一阶段,我们对研究范围内的现有清单、评估方法以及工业卫生和人体工程学标准进行了文献回顾。在此阶段,还分析了适用的地方法规和检查员目前的执法方法。在此基础上制定了一份清单草案。检查表采用宏观人体工程学方法,对工作系统的不同社会技术组成部分进行评估:每项任务的设计、执行任务的人员、执行任务的物理环境以及组织的管理系统和文化。为了鼓励采用更全面的方法来评估HFE,该清单还借鉴了工业卫生以外的不同领域的技术,如人为错误工程、组织心理学和工业设计。研究的第二阶段包括与健康及卫生局督察、不同领域和业界的学者和专业人士进行多次讨论,以进一步完善核对表,使进行工作场所视察的督察、工业卫生师和安全从业员都能使用该核对表,找出工作场所需要改善的地方。该核对表还由2个工作场所的安全从业员和7个工作场所的健康及卫生局检查员进行了测试。在测试期间,监管检查员和行业安全从业人员都对检查表的方法和范围给予了积极的反馈。其中包含了与认知人体工程学和组织心理学相关的鲜为人知的元素,尽管这些并没有受到当地法律的明确规定,但还是受到了很好的欢迎。但是,由于在核对表中使用了宏观人体工程学方法,因此对详细程度和完成核对表所需的时间提出了关切。清单仍在制定中,项目的下一阶段将于2023年开始,其中包括一个试点方案,将在全国不同行业的多个工作场所对清单进行深入测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Comprehensive Human Factor and Ergonomics Checklist for Workplace Inspections Using a Macroergonomics Approach
Lack of time and manpower as well as a fragmented inspection process are some of the challenges faced by industrial hygiene inspectors from the Malaysian Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) in carrying out their duties especially regarding industrial hygiene and ergonomics related workplace inspections. To streamline the inspection process and ensure a comprehensive assessment of the workplace, a study was carried out to develop a comprehensive Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) checklist. To our knowledge, there is no publicly available checklist covering all three ergonomics domains (physical, cognitive and organizational) that is designed to facilitate workplace inspection and regulatory enforcement process by industrial hygienists and inspectors.The study was divided into several phases. During the first phase, a literature review was carried out looking at existing checklists, assessment methods and industrial hygiene and ergonomics standards that fell within the scope of our study. During this phase, the applicable local regulations and current enforcement methods by inspectors were also analyzed. Based on this a draft checklist was developed. The checklist utilizes a macroergonomics approach where the different socio-technical components of the work system are assessed: the design of each task, the personnel carrying out the task, the physical environment the task is being carried out as well as the management systems and culture of the organization. To encourage a more holistic approach to assessing HFE, the checklist also borrows techniques from diverse fields outside of industrial hygiene such as human error engineering, organizational psychology, and industrial design.The second phase of the study involved multiple discussion sessions with DOSH inspectors, academics and professionals in various fields and industry to further refine the checklist so that it can be used both by inspectors carrying out workplace inspections as well industrial hygienists and safety practitioners to identify areas for improvement in their own workplaces. The checklist was also tested at by safety practitioners at 2 workplaces and by DOSH inspectors at 7 workplaces. During the tests, both regulatory inspectors and industry safety practitioners gave positive feedback on the approach and scope of the checklist. The inclusion of lesser-known elements related to cognitive ergonomics and organizational psychology were well-received even though these are not explicitly regulated by local law. However, since a macroergonomics approach was used in the checklist, there were concerns raised regarding the level of detail and time required to complete the checklist.The checklist is still being developed and the next phase of the project which will start in 2023 includes a Pilot Program where in-depth testing of the checklist will be undertaken at multiple workplaces in different industries throughout the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信