高等教育慈善事业的角色转换:慈善政策策略的网络分析

N. Haddad, S. Reckhow
{"title":"高等教育慈善事业的角色转换:慈善政策策略的网络分析","authors":"N. Haddad, S. Reckhow","doi":"10.2979/PHILEDUC.2.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Newer foundations have ushered in a novel approach to higher education philanthropy, which many observers call “advocacy philanthropy.” Have older, more traditional foundations also shifted toward advocacy? Drawing on longitudinal data, social network analysis, and semi-structured interviews, this paper investigates the extent of advocacy philanthropy among four major higher education funders—the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lumina Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the Kresge Foundation. We examine over 4,000 grants directed toward higher education from 2003 to 2012, representing over $3.5 billion. We find that older funders, like Kellogg and Kresge, have adopted some of the advocacy strategies brought in by the newer foundations, like Gates and Lumina, and that all four funders have increasingly funded the same grantees over time. However, there are still some strategic differences between older and newer foundations in higher education.","PeriodicalId":343186,"journal":{"name":"Philanthropy & Education","volume":"14 5 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shifting Role of Higher Education Philanthropy: A Network Analysis of Philanthropic Policy Strategies\",\"authors\":\"N. Haddad, S. Reckhow\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/PHILEDUC.2.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Newer foundations have ushered in a novel approach to higher education philanthropy, which many observers call “advocacy philanthropy.” Have older, more traditional foundations also shifted toward advocacy? Drawing on longitudinal data, social network analysis, and semi-structured interviews, this paper investigates the extent of advocacy philanthropy among four major higher education funders—the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lumina Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the Kresge Foundation. We examine over 4,000 grants directed toward higher education from 2003 to 2012, representing over $3.5 billion. We find that older funders, like Kellogg and Kresge, have adopted some of the advocacy strategies brought in by the newer foundations, like Gates and Lumina, and that all four funders have increasingly funded the same grantees over time. However, there are still some strategic differences between older and newer foundations in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philanthropy & Education\",\"volume\":\"14 5 Pt 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philanthropy & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/PHILEDUC.2.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philanthropy & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/PHILEDUC.2.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要:较新的基金会开创了一种新的高等教育慈善方式,被许多观察家称为“倡导慈善”。更老、更传统的基金会是否也转向了倡导?利用纵向数据、社会网络分析和半结构化访谈,本文调查了四个主要高等教育资助者——比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会、卢米纳基金会、W.K.凯洛格基金会和克雷斯基基金会——倡导慈善事业的程度。我们调查了从2003年到2012年的4000多笔高等教育拨款,总额超过35亿美元。我们发现,凯洛格(Kellogg)和克雷斯基(Kresge)等较老的资助机构采用了盖茨(Gates)和卢米纳(Lumina)等较新基金会引入的一些倡导策略,而且随着时间的推移,这四家资助机构对同一受资助者的资助越来越多。然而,在高等教育中,新旧基金会之间仍然存在一些战略差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Shifting Role of Higher Education Philanthropy: A Network Analysis of Philanthropic Policy Strategies
Abstract:Newer foundations have ushered in a novel approach to higher education philanthropy, which many observers call “advocacy philanthropy.” Have older, more traditional foundations also shifted toward advocacy? Drawing on longitudinal data, social network analysis, and semi-structured interviews, this paper investigates the extent of advocacy philanthropy among four major higher education funders—the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lumina Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the Kresge Foundation. We examine over 4,000 grants directed toward higher education from 2003 to 2012, representing over $3.5 billion. We find that older funders, like Kellogg and Kresge, have adopted some of the advocacy strategies brought in by the newer foundations, like Gates and Lumina, and that all four funders have increasingly funded the same grantees over time. However, there are still some strategic differences between older and newer foundations in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信