2001年世贸中心灾难——经验总结与评价

J. Pryor
{"title":"2001年世贸中心灾难——经验总结与评价","authors":"J. Pryor","doi":"10.1080/15031430310000847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To collect and analyse data from deaths and injuries, and from evaluation of the responses by medical services and by fire-, rescue-, and police services one year after the terror attack on World Trade Center. Methodology Epidemiologic data were collected from all involved agencies and analysed. The authors' personal experience from working at the scene during the event and several other personal testimonies were also included in this analysis. Results Totally 2.762 death certificates were issued by the state of New York for victims of the terror attack. 1.361 (49.9%) of these were issued for victims whose remains could not be identified. All but nine of these died at the day of the attack. 77% of the victims were male, medium age 39 years. Of the dead were 342 fire fighters and paramedics and 60 police officers. A total of 1.103 patients were treated during the first 48 days in five key-hospitals receiving the majority of the injured. 29% of these were rescue workers. 66% of the injured were male, average 39 years. The most common injuries were respiratory impairment (49%) and ocular affection (26%), many severe. The most common trauma was lacerations (14%) and sprains (14%). Of those administered to hospital, 19% had trauma and 19% burns. Head injuries were registered in 6% and crush injuries in 4%. With regard to response from involved agencies, communication failure was the most common and difficulties in command operations and scene control were also prevalent. Conclusions The difficulties encountered were very similar to those commonly seen in major accidents or disasters, although on a great scale. Response plans have to be critically reviewed based on experiences from this and other events, in order to pre-empt difficulties such as here described in future responses to major urban accidents and disasters.","PeriodicalId":257480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2001 World Trade Center disaster - summary and evaluation of experiences\",\"authors\":\"J. Pryor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15031430310000847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives To collect and analyse data from deaths and injuries, and from evaluation of the responses by medical services and by fire-, rescue-, and police services one year after the terror attack on World Trade Center. Methodology Epidemiologic data were collected from all involved agencies and analysed. The authors' personal experience from working at the scene during the event and several other personal testimonies were also included in this analysis. Results Totally 2.762 death certificates were issued by the state of New York for victims of the terror attack. 1.361 (49.9%) of these were issued for victims whose remains could not be identified. All but nine of these died at the day of the attack. 77% of the victims were male, medium age 39 years. Of the dead were 342 fire fighters and paramedics and 60 police officers. A total of 1.103 patients were treated during the first 48 days in five key-hospitals receiving the majority of the injured. 29% of these were rescue workers. 66% of the injured were male, average 39 years. The most common injuries were respiratory impairment (49%) and ocular affection (26%), many severe. The most common trauma was lacerations (14%) and sprains (14%). Of those administered to hospital, 19% had trauma and 19% burns. Head injuries were registered in 6% and crush injuries in 4%. With regard to response from involved agencies, communication failure was the most common and difficulties in command operations and scene control were also prevalent. Conclusions The difficulties encountered were very similar to those commonly seen in major accidents or disasters, although on a great scale. Response plans have to be critically reviewed based on experiences from this and other events, in order to pre-empt difficulties such as here described in future responses to major urban accidents and disasters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disaster Medicine\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disaster Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15031430310000847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15031430310000847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的收集和分析世界贸易中心恐怖袭击一年后的死亡和受伤数据,以及医疗服务、消防、救援和警察服务的反应评估数据。方法从所有相关机构收集流行病学资料并进行分析。作者在事件现场工作的个人经历和其他几个个人证词也包括在本分析中。结果纽约州共为恐怖袭击受害者签发了2762份死亡证明。其中1.361宗(49.9%)是发给遗体无法辨认的受害人。除9人外,其余人都在袭击当天死亡。77%的受害者是男性,中等年龄,39岁。死者中有342名消防员和护理人员以及60名警察。在前48天,共有1.103名患者在接收大多数伤者的5家重点医院接受治疗。其中29%是救援人员。66%的伤者为男性,平均年龄39岁。最常见的损伤是呼吸损伤(49%)和眼部损伤(26%),其中许多是严重的。最常见的创伤是撕裂伤(14%)和扭伤(14%)。在送往医院的患者中,19%有创伤,19%有烧伤。头部受伤占6%,挤压伤占4%。关于有关机构的反应,通讯失败是最常见的,指挥行动和现场控制方面的困难也很普遍。结论遇到的困难与在重大事故或灾害中常见的困难非常相似,尽管规模很大。应对计划必须根据这次和其他事件的经验进行严格审查,以便在今后应对重大城市事故和灾害时,预先防范这里所述的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2001 World Trade Center disaster - summary and evaluation of experiences
Objectives To collect and analyse data from deaths and injuries, and from evaluation of the responses by medical services and by fire-, rescue-, and police services one year after the terror attack on World Trade Center. Methodology Epidemiologic data were collected from all involved agencies and analysed. The authors' personal experience from working at the scene during the event and several other personal testimonies were also included in this analysis. Results Totally 2.762 death certificates were issued by the state of New York for victims of the terror attack. 1.361 (49.9%) of these were issued for victims whose remains could not be identified. All but nine of these died at the day of the attack. 77% of the victims were male, medium age 39 years. Of the dead were 342 fire fighters and paramedics and 60 police officers. A total of 1.103 patients were treated during the first 48 days in five key-hospitals receiving the majority of the injured. 29% of these were rescue workers. 66% of the injured were male, average 39 years. The most common injuries were respiratory impairment (49%) and ocular affection (26%), many severe. The most common trauma was lacerations (14%) and sprains (14%). Of those administered to hospital, 19% had trauma and 19% burns. Head injuries were registered in 6% and crush injuries in 4%. With regard to response from involved agencies, communication failure was the most common and difficulties in command operations and scene control were also prevalent. Conclusions The difficulties encountered were very similar to those commonly seen in major accidents or disasters, although on a great scale. Response plans have to be critically reviewed based on experiences from this and other events, in order to pre-empt difficulties such as here described in future responses to major urban accidents and disasters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信