{"title":"重塑神圣:科学、理性和宗教的新观点","authors":"J. Goldstein","doi":"10.5860/choice.46-0844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion written by Stuart Kauffman reviewed by Jeffrey A. Goldstein published by Basic Books ISBN 9780465003006 (2008) [YHVH says to all of you]: 'Look, I am doing something new It is emerging right now, Can't y ou see it? I am creating a path in the wilderness, And rivers out of the desert ' Isaiah 43: 19: I quote from the book of Isaiah to open this review because I see it as a counterpoint to Kauffman's opening of his book with a poetic excerpt from the English metaphysical poet John Donne, a selection that strikes me as an exceedingly odd choice given that Donne's poem not only involved a Trinitarian conception of God (a view of the sacred that Kauffman himself later repudiates, as we'll see) but also an intense and paradoxical depiction of a clash between faith and reason. Yet, this latter theme just doesn't mesh with Kauffman's book since, rather than delving into any sort of spiritual crisis, it comes down squarely on the side of secular humanism with the little he actually does devote to faith and the sacred never rising above the banal, something that could certainly never be said of Donne's poetry. The above quote from Isaiah, in contrast, points to the possibility of there being a sacred source of emergent novelty, indeed this was the basis of an entire theological interpretation of emergence that was one of the most important trends in twentieth century theology, namely, the movement known as Process Theology based on the metaphysics of emergence expounded by the mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead in his magnum opus, Process and Reality (1979); a theology of emergence about which Kauffman has nary a word to say. Because of my own high regard for Kauffman's Origins of Order (1993), which had a deep influence on my own thinking about emergence and other complexity constructs, I wanted to give the current book an honest read, but that initial intention quickly devolved into a painful chore. Certainly, the sentiments seemed right and laudable: an ecologically-friendly \"Green\" Theology and one coming from complexity science and one of its gurus! This enticing prospect, though, quickly evaporated since what little this book actually has to say about the sacred/spirituality/morality turns out to be surprisingly sparse and mostly platitudinous. Instead, the greater part of the book is given over to musings on a variety of subjects, most of which will be easily recognizable as concerns Kauffman has dealt with in the past, but a few of which are new such as his theory of the quantum brain which I'll be getting into in some detail below. To be sure Chapters Six and Ten present familiar Kauffman-style anti-reductionism arguments which are well-written, interesting, with important things to say about what I think we could call a failure of the imagination on the part of many scientists. However, in general, it's hard to know what to make of this book for most of it is given over to ruminations which seem, to this reviewer at least, as largely uninformed, many times as patently errant, and for the most part lacking cogency. Indeed, it makes me wonder if there are any genuine editors left, and please don't believe the testimonies on the back cover-one would have to be a total fool nowadays to give any credence to the blatant favor-swappings found on back covers! Much of Kauffman's speculations on such subjects as the \"quantum brain\" are even more far-fetched and poorly argued than most other utterances emanating from scientists during the \"philosopause\" phase of their careers. But before we get to them, first, let's go over the little that Kauffman does have to say about the sacred. What kind of \"sacred\" is Kauffman talking about? Although Kauffman's book purports to be about the sacred, this is the most arid and least interesting aspect of the book. …","PeriodicalId":240163,"journal":{"name":"Emergence: Complexity and Organization","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"199","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion\",\"authors\":\"J. Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.46-0844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion written by Stuart Kauffman reviewed by Jeffrey A. Goldstein published by Basic Books ISBN 9780465003006 (2008) [YHVH says to all of you]: 'Look, I am doing something new It is emerging right now, Can't y ou see it? I am creating a path in the wilderness, And rivers out of the desert ' Isaiah 43: 19: I quote from the book of Isaiah to open this review because I see it as a counterpoint to Kauffman's opening of his book with a poetic excerpt from the English metaphysical poet John Donne, a selection that strikes me as an exceedingly odd choice given that Donne's poem not only involved a Trinitarian conception of God (a view of the sacred that Kauffman himself later repudiates, as we'll see) but also an intense and paradoxical depiction of a clash between faith and reason. Yet, this latter theme just doesn't mesh with Kauffman's book since, rather than delving into any sort of spiritual crisis, it comes down squarely on the side of secular humanism with the little he actually does devote to faith and the sacred never rising above the banal, something that could certainly never be said of Donne's poetry. The above quote from Isaiah, in contrast, points to the possibility of there being a sacred source of emergent novelty, indeed this was the basis of an entire theological interpretation of emergence that was one of the most important trends in twentieth century theology, namely, the movement known as Process Theology based on the metaphysics of emergence expounded by the mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead in his magnum opus, Process and Reality (1979); a theology of emergence about which Kauffman has nary a word to say. Because of my own high regard for Kauffman's Origins of Order (1993), which had a deep influence on my own thinking about emergence and other complexity constructs, I wanted to give the current book an honest read, but that initial intention quickly devolved into a painful chore. Certainly, the sentiments seemed right and laudable: an ecologically-friendly \\\"Green\\\" Theology and one coming from complexity science and one of its gurus! This enticing prospect, though, quickly evaporated since what little this book actually has to say about the sacred/spirituality/morality turns out to be surprisingly sparse and mostly platitudinous. Instead, the greater part of the book is given over to musings on a variety of subjects, most of which will be easily recognizable as concerns Kauffman has dealt with in the past, but a few of which are new such as his theory of the quantum brain which I'll be getting into in some detail below. To be sure Chapters Six and Ten present familiar Kauffman-style anti-reductionism arguments which are well-written, interesting, with important things to say about what I think we could call a failure of the imagination on the part of many scientists. However, in general, it's hard to know what to make of this book for most of it is given over to ruminations which seem, to this reviewer at least, as largely uninformed, many times as patently errant, and for the most part lacking cogency. Indeed, it makes me wonder if there are any genuine editors left, and please don't believe the testimonies on the back cover-one would have to be a total fool nowadays to give any credence to the blatant favor-swappings found on back covers! Much of Kauffman's speculations on such subjects as the \\\"quantum brain\\\" are even more far-fetched and poorly argued than most other utterances emanating from scientists during the \\\"philosopause\\\" phase of their careers. But before we get to them, first, let's go over the little that Kauffman does have to say about the sacred. What kind of \\\"sacred\\\" is Kauffman talking about? Although Kauffman's book purports to be about the sacred, this is the most arid and least interesting aspect of the book. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":240163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergence: Complexity and Organization\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"199\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergence: Complexity and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-0844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergence: Complexity and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-0844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 199
摘要
《重新发明神圣:科学、理性和宗教的新观点》书评,斯图尔特·考夫曼著,杰弗里·A·戈德斯坦评论,Basic Books ISBN 9780465003006(2008)[耶和华对你们所有人说]:“看,我正在做一些新的事情,它正在出现,你看不见吗?赛43:19我要在旷野开道路、在旷野开江河。我引用从以赛亚书打开这个评论,因为我认为这是一个与考夫曼的打开他的书从英国玄学派诗人约翰·多恩诗歌摘录,一个选择,给我的印象是一个非常奇怪的选择考虑到多恩的诗歌不仅涉及上帝的三位一体的概念(一个视图的神圣,考夫曼本人后来否定,我们会看到)也强烈的信仰和理性之间的冲突和矛盾的描述。然而,后一个主题与考夫曼的书并不相符,因为它没有深入探讨任何精神危机,而是直接站在世俗人文主义的一边,他实际上对信仰和神圣的贡献很少,从来没有超越平庸,这当然是多恩的诗所不能说的。与此相反,以上引用以赛亚的话,指出了出现新奇事物的神圣来源的可能性,事实上,这是对出现的整个神学解释的基础,这是20世纪神学中最重要的趋势之一,即数学家和哲学家阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特黑德(Alfred North Whitehead)在其代表作《过程与现实》(1979)中阐述的基于出现形而上学的过程神学运动;一种涌现神学,考夫曼对此只字未提。由于我自己对考夫曼的《秩序的起源》(1993)的高度推崇,它对我自己对涌现和其他复杂性结构的思考产生了深刻的影响,我想诚实地阅读这本书,但最初的意图很快就变成了一件痛苦的苦事。当然,这种观点似乎是正确的,值得称赞:一种生态友好的“绿色”神学,一种来自复杂性科学及其大师之一的神学!然而,这种诱人的前景很快就消失了,因为这本书中关于神圣/灵性/道德的内容少得惊人,而且大多是陈词滥调。相反,这本书的大部分都是对各种主题的思考,其中大部分很容易被认出是考夫曼过去处理过的问题,但其中一些是新的,比如他的量子大脑理论,我将在下面详细介绍。可以肯定的是,第六章和第十章呈现了我们熟悉的考夫曼式的反还原论论点,写得很好,很有趣,有很多重要的东西要讲,我认为我们可以称之为许多科学家想象力的失败。然而,总的来说,很难知道如何理解这本书,因为它的大部分内容都是关于思考的,至少在这个评论家看来,这些思考在很大程度上是无知的,很多时候明显是错误的,而且在很大程度上缺乏说服力。事实上,这让我怀疑是否还有真正的编辑,请不要相信封底上的证词——现在只有大傻瓜才会相信封底上明目张胆的人情交换!考夫曼关于“量子大脑”等主题的许多推测甚至比科学家在其职业生涯的“哲学”阶段发表的大多数其他言论更牵强,更缺乏说服力。但在我们讨论它们之前,首先让我们回顾一下考夫曼关于神圣的一些观点。考夫曼说的是什么样的“神圣”?虽然考夫曼的书声称是关于神圣的,但这是这本书最枯燥、最无趣的方面。…
Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion
A Review of Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion written by Stuart Kauffman reviewed by Jeffrey A. Goldstein published by Basic Books ISBN 9780465003006 (2008) [YHVH says to all of you]: 'Look, I am doing something new It is emerging right now, Can't y ou see it? I am creating a path in the wilderness, And rivers out of the desert ' Isaiah 43: 19: I quote from the book of Isaiah to open this review because I see it as a counterpoint to Kauffman's opening of his book with a poetic excerpt from the English metaphysical poet John Donne, a selection that strikes me as an exceedingly odd choice given that Donne's poem not only involved a Trinitarian conception of God (a view of the sacred that Kauffman himself later repudiates, as we'll see) but also an intense and paradoxical depiction of a clash between faith and reason. Yet, this latter theme just doesn't mesh with Kauffman's book since, rather than delving into any sort of spiritual crisis, it comes down squarely on the side of secular humanism with the little he actually does devote to faith and the sacred never rising above the banal, something that could certainly never be said of Donne's poetry. The above quote from Isaiah, in contrast, points to the possibility of there being a sacred source of emergent novelty, indeed this was the basis of an entire theological interpretation of emergence that was one of the most important trends in twentieth century theology, namely, the movement known as Process Theology based on the metaphysics of emergence expounded by the mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead in his magnum opus, Process and Reality (1979); a theology of emergence about which Kauffman has nary a word to say. Because of my own high regard for Kauffman's Origins of Order (1993), which had a deep influence on my own thinking about emergence and other complexity constructs, I wanted to give the current book an honest read, but that initial intention quickly devolved into a painful chore. Certainly, the sentiments seemed right and laudable: an ecologically-friendly "Green" Theology and one coming from complexity science and one of its gurus! This enticing prospect, though, quickly evaporated since what little this book actually has to say about the sacred/spirituality/morality turns out to be surprisingly sparse and mostly platitudinous. Instead, the greater part of the book is given over to musings on a variety of subjects, most of which will be easily recognizable as concerns Kauffman has dealt with in the past, but a few of which are new such as his theory of the quantum brain which I'll be getting into in some detail below. To be sure Chapters Six and Ten present familiar Kauffman-style anti-reductionism arguments which are well-written, interesting, with important things to say about what I think we could call a failure of the imagination on the part of many scientists. However, in general, it's hard to know what to make of this book for most of it is given over to ruminations which seem, to this reviewer at least, as largely uninformed, many times as patently errant, and for the most part lacking cogency. Indeed, it makes me wonder if there are any genuine editors left, and please don't believe the testimonies on the back cover-one would have to be a total fool nowadays to give any credence to the blatant favor-swappings found on back covers! Much of Kauffman's speculations on such subjects as the "quantum brain" are even more far-fetched and poorly argued than most other utterances emanating from scientists during the "philosopause" phase of their careers. But before we get to them, first, let's go over the little that Kauffman does have to say about the sacred. What kind of "sacred" is Kauffman talking about? Although Kauffman's book purports to be about the sacred, this is the most arid and least interesting aspect of the book. …