{"title":"加州旧金山湾浅水测速记录仪的比较","authors":"J. Gartner, R. Oltmann","doi":"10.1109/OCEANS.1985.1160148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several recording current meters were field tested in South San Francisco Bay, California to determine their effectiveness for use in shallow (tidally effected) waters under the influence of wind-generated waves. Speed sensors employed by the meters included a horizontal-axis ducted impeller (Endeco-174), vertical-axis rotor (Aanderaa RCM-4), inclinometer (General Oceanics 6011 MKII), and electromagnetic sensor (InterOcean Systems S4). Meters were deployed from June to September 1984 at 1.2 m above bottom using bottom platforms and a taut-wire mooring. Water depth ranged between 2.0 and 5.1 m during the study. Comparison of velocity records showed that near slack water when wind speed was about 5 m/s or greater and water depth was about 3.5 m or less, Aanderaa and General Oceanics meters recorded higher current speeds than did Endeco and InterOcean meters. Endeco and InterOcean meters recorded speeds that approached zero near slack water regardless of wind and water depth. However, as current speeds increased after slack water, speeds recorded by the InterOcean meter were 20 to 50 percent higher than those recorded by the Endeco meter. During low wind periods or when water depth exceeded about 3.5 m, speed readings from Endeco and Aanderaa meters showed close agreement even at slack water. At higher current speeds, InterOcean and General Oceanics meters recorded consistently higher speeds than did the Endeco or Aanderaa meters. Directional data differences were insignificant. Whereas the Endeco and InterOcean meters (as tested) appear suitable for measuring low velocities in the wind wave zone, further testing is required to determine which meter type records mere accurately at higher current speeds.","PeriodicalId":437366,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS '85 - Ocean Engineering and the Environment","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of recording current meters used for measuring velocities in shallow waters of San Francisco Bay, California\",\"authors\":\"J. Gartner, R. Oltmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OCEANS.1985.1160148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several recording current meters were field tested in South San Francisco Bay, California to determine their effectiveness for use in shallow (tidally effected) waters under the influence of wind-generated waves. Speed sensors employed by the meters included a horizontal-axis ducted impeller (Endeco-174), vertical-axis rotor (Aanderaa RCM-4), inclinometer (General Oceanics 6011 MKII), and electromagnetic sensor (InterOcean Systems S4). Meters were deployed from June to September 1984 at 1.2 m above bottom using bottom platforms and a taut-wire mooring. Water depth ranged between 2.0 and 5.1 m during the study. Comparison of velocity records showed that near slack water when wind speed was about 5 m/s or greater and water depth was about 3.5 m or less, Aanderaa and General Oceanics meters recorded higher current speeds than did Endeco and InterOcean meters. Endeco and InterOcean meters recorded speeds that approached zero near slack water regardless of wind and water depth. However, as current speeds increased after slack water, speeds recorded by the InterOcean meter were 20 to 50 percent higher than those recorded by the Endeco meter. During low wind periods or when water depth exceeded about 3.5 m, speed readings from Endeco and Aanderaa meters showed close agreement even at slack water. At higher current speeds, InterOcean and General Oceanics meters recorded consistently higher speeds than did the Endeco or Aanderaa meters. Directional data differences were insignificant. Whereas the Endeco and InterOcean meters (as tested) appear suitable for measuring low velocities in the wind wave zone, further testing is required to determine which meter type records mere accurately at higher current speeds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCEANS '85 - Ocean Engineering and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCEANS '85 - Ocean Engineering and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1985.1160148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS '85 - Ocean Engineering and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1985.1160148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
在加利福尼亚的南旧金山湾对几台记录电流计进行了现场测试,以确定它们在风力产生的波浪影响下在浅水(受潮汐影响)中使用的有效性。仪表采用的速度传感器包括水平轴导管叶轮(Endeco-174)、垂直轴转子(Aanderaa RCM-4)、倾角仪(General Oceanics 6011 MKII)和电磁传感器(InterOcean Systems S4)。1984年6月至9月期间,在距海底1.2米的地方安装了测量仪,使用底部平台和钢丝绳系泊。在研究期间,水深在2.0至5.1米之间。速度记录的比较表明,当风速约为5米/秒或更高,水深约为3.5米或更低时,Aanderaa和General Oceanics仪器记录的流速比Endeco和InterOcean仪器记录的流速要高。Endeco和InterOcean测量仪记录的速度在松弛水域接近零,而不考虑风和水深。然而,在淡水期过后,随着水流速度的增加,InterOcean测量仪记录的速度比Endeco测量仪记录的速度高20%到50%。在低风期或水深超过3.5米时,Endeco和Aanderaa的速度读数即使在淡水期也非常一致。在较高的航速下,InterOcean和General Oceanics的测速仪记录的航速始终高于Endeco和Aanderaa的测速仪。方向性数据差异不显著。尽管Endeco和InterOcean仪表(经测试)似乎适合测量风浪带的低速,但需要进一步测试以确定哪种仪表类型在较高的流速下仅能准确记录。
Comparison of recording current meters used for measuring velocities in shallow waters of San Francisco Bay, California
Several recording current meters were field tested in South San Francisco Bay, California to determine their effectiveness for use in shallow (tidally effected) waters under the influence of wind-generated waves. Speed sensors employed by the meters included a horizontal-axis ducted impeller (Endeco-174), vertical-axis rotor (Aanderaa RCM-4), inclinometer (General Oceanics 6011 MKII), and electromagnetic sensor (InterOcean Systems S4). Meters were deployed from June to September 1984 at 1.2 m above bottom using bottom platforms and a taut-wire mooring. Water depth ranged between 2.0 and 5.1 m during the study. Comparison of velocity records showed that near slack water when wind speed was about 5 m/s or greater and water depth was about 3.5 m or less, Aanderaa and General Oceanics meters recorded higher current speeds than did Endeco and InterOcean meters. Endeco and InterOcean meters recorded speeds that approached zero near slack water regardless of wind and water depth. However, as current speeds increased after slack water, speeds recorded by the InterOcean meter were 20 to 50 percent higher than those recorded by the Endeco meter. During low wind periods or when water depth exceeded about 3.5 m, speed readings from Endeco and Aanderaa meters showed close agreement even at slack water. At higher current speeds, InterOcean and General Oceanics meters recorded consistently higher speeds than did the Endeco or Aanderaa meters. Directional data differences were insignificant. Whereas the Endeco and InterOcean meters (as tested) appear suitable for measuring low velocities in the wind wave zone, further testing is required to determine which meter type records mere accurately at higher current speeds.