{"title":"在数据驱动的社会中规范“社会分数”","authors":"Louis Geoffroy-Terryn","doi":"10.1145/3326365.3326446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.","PeriodicalId":178287,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating 'Social Scores' in Data-Driven Societies\",\"authors\":\"Louis Geoffroy-Terryn\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3326365.3326446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regulating 'Social Scores' in Data-Driven Societies
This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.