在数据驱动的社会中规范“社会分数”

Louis Geoffroy-Terryn
{"title":"在数据驱动的社会中规范“社会分数”","authors":"Louis Geoffroy-Terryn","doi":"10.1145/3326365.3326446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.","PeriodicalId":178287,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating 'Social Scores' in Data-Driven Societies\",\"authors\":\"Louis Geoffroy-Terryn\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3326365.3326446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了“社会分数”在三个有影响力的司法管辖区的发展:欧盟、美国和中国。本文认为,这种做法所处的法律和监管框架是影响潜在成功以及由此产生的危险的一个重要因素。因此,本文采用比较方法,通过跨案例分析,重点介绍三个有影响力的司法管辖区的最新发展。在此过程中,本文试图确定一种创新实践发展中的共同实践和差异,这种创新实践可能对数百万人的生活产生深远影响,而无论其文化、社会和法律背景如何。在这张海报中,从上下文和法律监管的角度提出了论文所依据的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating 'Social Scores' in Data-Driven Societies
This paper investigates the development of 'social scores' in three influential jurisdictions: the EU, the US and China. The paper contends that the legal and regulatory framework in which this practice takes place is a significant factor influencing potential successes as well as perils stemming from it. As such, the paper adopts a comparative approach, through a cross-case analysis introducing recent developments across the three influential jurisdictions in focus. In doing so, the paper seeks to identify common practices as well as differences in the development of an innovative practice with -- potentially -- far reaching consequences onto the lives of millions, irrespective of cultural, social and legal backgrounds. In this poster paper, the bases on which the paper stands from a contextual and legal-regulatory perspectives are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信