孟加拉国COVID-19大流行的人口统计学、临床特征和住院结果的波浪比较:单中心研究

Fazila-Tun Nesa Malik, M. Kalimuddin, M. Ishraquzzaman, M. Al Mamun, Ashok Dutta, Md Habibur Rahman, Smita Kanungo, N. Laila, Md. Shamim Chowdhury, S. Choudhury
{"title":"孟加拉国COVID-19大流行的人口统计学、临床特征和住院结果的波浪比较:单中心研究","authors":"Fazila-Tun Nesa Malik, M. Kalimuddin, M. Ishraquzzaman, M. Al Mamun, Ashok Dutta, Md Habibur Rahman, Smita Kanungo, N. Laila, Md. Shamim Chowdhury, S. Choudhury","doi":"10.3329/bhj.v38i1.67189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most countries in the world faced two waves of Corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19). But there is a lack of data regarding the wave-wise comparison of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aimed to compare the demographics, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. \nMethods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute. From April 3, 2020, to January 28, 2021, was considered the first wave, and from February 27, 2021, to September 25, 2021, was considered the second wave. COVID-positive patients and all admitted patients who became COVID-19 positive during these periods were included in this study for comparison. \nResults: The first wave included 727 patients, and the second wave included 858 patients. The mean age of the patients in the first wave was 48.11 15.75 years, and in the second wave it was 50.65 16.63 years. Males were predominant in both waves. Healthcare personnel were less affected during the second wave (11.9% vs. 30.7%; p=0.001). Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease were more prevalent in the second wave (p 0.05), and dyslipidemia and obesity in the first wave (p<0.05). During the second wave, 80.5% of patients were unvaccinated. Asymptomatic patients were predominant in the second wave (26.9% vs. 17.5%; p=0.001). COVID-19-related symptoms (fever, body ache, headache, anosmia, sore throat, shortness of breath, and diarrhea) were less prominent during the second wave (p<0.05). Oxygen requirements and IV antibiotic use were higher during the second wave (p<0.05). Asymptomatic & severe disease form were prevalent in second wave (p<0.05). Mortality rate was more during second wave (5.1% vs 3.4%; p=0.1). Age > 50 years, severe left ventricular dysfunction, severe and critically ill patients were the independent predictor of mortality. \nConclusion: In comparison to the first wave, during the second wave symptoms were less prominent, asymptomatic and severe disease forms were more prevalent & mortality rate was high. Unvaccinated persons are more prone to affected by COVID-19. \nBangladesh Heart Journal 2023; 38(1): 13-21","PeriodicalId":247590,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wave-Wise Comparison of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics & In-Hospital Outcome of COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: Single Centre Study\",\"authors\":\"Fazila-Tun Nesa Malik, M. Kalimuddin, M. Ishraquzzaman, M. Al Mamun, Ashok Dutta, Md Habibur Rahman, Smita Kanungo, N. Laila, Md. Shamim Chowdhury, S. Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bhj.v38i1.67189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Most countries in the world faced two waves of Corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19). But there is a lack of data regarding the wave-wise comparison of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aimed to compare the demographics, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. \\nMethods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute. From April 3, 2020, to January 28, 2021, was considered the first wave, and from February 27, 2021, to September 25, 2021, was considered the second wave. COVID-positive patients and all admitted patients who became COVID-19 positive during these periods were included in this study for comparison. \\nResults: The first wave included 727 patients, and the second wave included 858 patients. The mean age of the patients in the first wave was 48.11 15.75 years, and in the second wave it was 50.65 16.63 years. Males were predominant in both waves. Healthcare personnel were less affected during the second wave (11.9% vs. 30.7%; p=0.001). Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease were more prevalent in the second wave (p 0.05), and dyslipidemia and obesity in the first wave (p<0.05). During the second wave, 80.5% of patients were unvaccinated. Asymptomatic patients were predominant in the second wave (26.9% vs. 17.5%; p=0.001). COVID-19-related symptoms (fever, body ache, headache, anosmia, sore throat, shortness of breath, and diarrhea) were less prominent during the second wave (p<0.05). Oxygen requirements and IV antibiotic use were higher during the second wave (p<0.05). Asymptomatic & severe disease form were prevalent in second wave (p<0.05). Mortality rate was more during second wave (5.1% vs 3.4%; p=0.1). Age > 50 years, severe left ventricular dysfunction, severe and critically ill patients were the independent predictor of mortality. \\nConclusion: In comparison to the first wave, during the second wave symptoms were less prominent, asymptomatic and severe disease forms were more prevalent & mortality rate was high. Unvaccinated persons are more prone to affected by COVID-19. \\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2023; 38(1): 13-21\",\"PeriodicalId\":247590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v38i1.67189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v38i1.67189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界上大多数国家都面临两波冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)。但是,缺乏关于COVID-19疫情的流行病学和临床特征的逐波比较的数据。本研究旨在比较孟加拉国两波COVID-19大流行的人口统计学、临床特征和住院结果。方法:本前瞻性横断面研究在国立心脏基金会医院及研究所进行。从2020年4月3日到2021年1月28日,被认为是第一波,从2021年2月27日到2021年9月25日,被认为是第二波。将COVID-19阳性患者和所有在此期间成为COVID-19阳性的住院患者纳入本研究进行比较。结果:第一波纳入727例,第二波纳入858例。第一波患者平均年龄为48.11 ~ 15.75岁,第二波患者平均年龄为50.65 ~ 16.63岁。在两次浪潮中,男性都占主导地位。医务人员在第二波中受影响较小(11.9% vs. 30.7%;p = 0.001)。高血压、慢性肾脏疾病和心血管疾病在第二波中更为普遍(p 0.05),而血脂异常和肥胖在第一波中(p 50年,严重左心室功能障碍,重症和危重症患者是死亡率的独立预测因子。结论:与第一波相比,第二波症状不明显,无症状和严重疾病形式更为普遍,死亡率较高。未接种疫苗的人更容易受到COVID-19的影响。孟加拉国心脏杂志2023;38 (1): 13-21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wave-Wise Comparison of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics & In-Hospital Outcome of COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: Single Centre Study
Background: Most countries in the world faced two waves of Corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19). But there is a lack of data regarding the wave-wise comparison of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aimed to compare the demographics, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute. From April 3, 2020, to January 28, 2021, was considered the first wave, and from February 27, 2021, to September 25, 2021, was considered the second wave. COVID-positive patients and all admitted patients who became COVID-19 positive during these periods were included in this study for comparison. Results: The first wave included 727 patients, and the second wave included 858 patients. The mean age of the patients in the first wave was 48.11 15.75 years, and in the second wave it was 50.65 16.63 years. Males were predominant in both waves. Healthcare personnel were less affected during the second wave (11.9% vs. 30.7%; p=0.001). Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease were more prevalent in the second wave (p 0.05), and dyslipidemia and obesity in the first wave (p<0.05). During the second wave, 80.5% of patients were unvaccinated. Asymptomatic patients were predominant in the second wave (26.9% vs. 17.5%; p=0.001). COVID-19-related symptoms (fever, body ache, headache, anosmia, sore throat, shortness of breath, and diarrhea) were less prominent during the second wave (p<0.05). Oxygen requirements and IV antibiotic use were higher during the second wave (p<0.05). Asymptomatic & severe disease form were prevalent in second wave (p<0.05). Mortality rate was more during second wave (5.1% vs 3.4%; p=0.1). Age > 50 years, severe left ventricular dysfunction, severe and critically ill patients were the independent predictor of mortality. Conclusion: In comparison to the first wave, during the second wave symptoms were less prominent, asymptomatic and severe disease forms were more prevalent & mortality rate was high. Unvaccinated persons are more prone to affected by COVID-19. Bangladesh Heart Journal 2023; 38(1): 13-21
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信