分析学习敏捷开发原则的研讨会的有效性

Shota Suzuki, Ryushi Shiohama, Masashi Kadoya, Kazunori Sakamoto, H. Washizaki, Y. Fukazawa
{"title":"分析学习敏捷开发原则的研讨会的有效性","authors":"Shota Suzuki, Ryushi Shiohama, Masashi Kadoya, Kazunori Sakamoto, H. Washizaki, Y. Fukazawa","doi":"10.1109/AGILE.2013.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workshops are sometimes known as effective ways to learn the human and social factors of software engineering. However, their effectiveness in learning agile development principles in particular has not yet been determined, despite the fact that numerous agile development workshops have been held over the years. In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of agile development workshops through an experiment, and show that one of representative workshops is indeed effective at learning agile principles. Self-study is another commonly used method to learn something new. Therefore, we compare the effectiveness of workshops with that of self-study to better illustrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops. In our experiment, we examine 7 workshop subjects and 8 self-study subjects, and compare their scores on the agile mind check, which is a method used to measure their degree of mastery of agile principles. As a result, we demonstrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops, especially those that simulate actual experiences. We also show that one of workshops is more effective than self-study regarding the agile mind check score.","PeriodicalId":248287,"journal":{"name":"2013 Agile Conference","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Effectiveness of Workshops for Learning Agile Development Principles\",\"authors\":\"Shota Suzuki, Ryushi Shiohama, Masashi Kadoya, Kazunori Sakamoto, H. Washizaki, Y. Fukazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AGILE.2013.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workshops are sometimes known as effective ways to learn the human and social factors of software engineering. However, their effectiveness in learning agile development principles in particular has not yet been determined, despite the fact that numerous agile development workshops have been held over the years. In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of agile development workshops through an experiment, and show that one of representative workshops is indeed effective at learning agile principles. Self-study is another commonly used method to learn something new. Therefore, we compare the effectiveness of workshops with that of self-study to better illustrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops. In our experiment, we examine 7 workshop subjects and 8 self-study subjects, and compare their scores on the agile mind check, which is a method used to measure their degree of mastery of agile principles. As a result, we demonstrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops, especially those that simulate actual experiences. We also show that one of workshops is more effective than self-study regarding the agile mind check score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Agile Conference\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Agile Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2013.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Agile Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2013.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研讨会有时被认为是学习软件工程中人与社会因素的有效途径。然而,尽管多年来已经举办了许多敏捷开发研讨会,但它们在学习敏捷开发原则方面的有效性尚未确定。在本文中,我们通过实验分析了敏捷开发研讨会的有效性,并表明其中一个具有代表性的研讨会在学习敏捷原则方面确实有效。自学是另一种常用的学习新东西的方法。因此,我们将研讨会的有效性与自学的有效性进行比较,以更好地说明敏捷开发研讨会的有效性。在我们的实验中,我们测试了7名工作坊参与者和8名自学参与者,并比较了他们在敏捷思维测试中的得分,这是一种用来衡量他们对敏捷原则掌握程度的方法。因此,我们展示了敏捷开发研讨会的有效性,特别是那些模拟实际经验的研讨会。我们还表明,就敏捷思维检查得分而言,其中一个讲习班比自学更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing Effectiveness of Workshops for Learning Agile Development Principles
Workshops are sometimes known as effective ways to learn the human and social factors of software engineering. However, their effectiveness in learning agile development principles in particular has not yet been determined, despite the fact that numerous agile development workshops have been held over the years. In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of agile development workshops through an experiment, and show that one of representative workshops is indeed effective at learning agile principles. Self-study is another commonly used method to learn something new. Therefore, we compare the effectiveness of workshops with that of self-study to better illustrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops. In our experiment, we examine 7 workshop subjects and 8 self-study subjects, and compare their scores on the agile mind check, which is a method used to measure their degree of mastery of agile principles. As a result, we demonstrate the effectiveness of agile development workshops, especially those that simulate actual experiences. We also show that one of workshops is more effective than self-study regarding the agile mind check score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信