评价阿拉伯语教师评价学生素养的评价方法

Agus Riwanda, Syahabuddin Nor, M. Ridha, M. Islamy
{"title":"评价阿拉伯语教师评价学生素养的评价方法","authors":"Agus Riwanda, Syahabuddin Nor, M. Ridha, M. Islamy","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.220104.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Arabic online during the COVID-19 pandemic is full of challenges. Educators are required to be selective in choosing assessment methods relevant to the four Arabic language competencies and suitable for use online. This study aims to determine the online assessment methods and assessment media used by Arabic language teachers to evaluate their students’ literacy in Arabic learning. This research is survey research. This study involved 87 Arabic teachers from 45 Public Madrasah Aliyah (Islamic Public Senior High School) in South Kalimantan. Data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires and interviews. The data from close-ended questionnaires were analyzed and presented in descriptive methods. The data from open-ended was analyzed by reviewing each response, discovering themes in the verbatim statement, coding, and grouping the topics. The results of this study indicate that the assessment methods most often used by teachers are multiple-choice, true-false, short answer, and performance. The assessment method most students respond to is multiple-choice, true-false, and short answers. The assessment methods that students respond to the least are performance, products, interviews, and short answers.","PeriodicalId":412358,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Arabic Teachers’ Assessment Methods in Evaluating Students’ Literacy\",\"authors\":\"Agus Riwanda, Syahabuddin Nor, M. Ridha, M. Islamy\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.220104.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning Arabic online during the COVID-19 pandemic is full of challenges. Educators are required to be selective in choosing assessment methods relevant to the four Arabic language competencies and suitable for use online. This study aims to determine the online assessment methods and assessment media used by Arabic language teachers to evaluate their students’ literacy in Arabic learning. This research is survey research. This study involved 87 Arabic teachers from 45 Public Madrasah Aliyah (Islamic Public Senior High School) in South Kalimantan. Data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires and interviews. The data from close-ended questionnaires were analyzed and presented in descriptive methods. The data from open-ended was analyzed by reviewing each response, discovering themes in the verbatim statement, coding, and grouping the topics. The results of this study indicate that the assessment methods most often used by teachers are multiple-choice, true-false, short answer, and performance. The assessment method most students respond to is multiple-choice, true-false, and short answers. The assessment methods that students respond to the least are performance, products, interviews, and short answers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021)\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220104.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220104.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在线学习阿拉伯语充满挑战。教育工作者需要有选择性地选择与四种阿拉伯语能力相关的评估方法,并适合在线使用。本研究旨在确定阿拉伯语教师在评估学生阿拉伯语学习素养时所使用的在线评估方法和评估媒介。本研究为调查研究。本研究涉及南加里曼丹45所公立伊斯兰高中的87名阿拉伯语教师。本研究使用的数据收集技术是问卷调查和访谈。对封闭式问卷的数据进行分析,并以描述性方法呈现。通过回顾每个回答,发现逐字陈述中的主题,编码和分组主题来分析来自开放式的数据。本研究结果显示,教师最常使用的评估方法是选择题、正误、简答和绩效。大多数学生的评估方法是选择题、正题和简答题。学生反应最少的评估方法是表现、产品、访谈和简短回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Arabic Teachers’ Assessment Methods in Evaluating Students’ Literacy
Learning Arabic online during the COVID-19 pandemic is full of challenges. Educators are required to be selective in choosing assessment methods relevant to the four Arabic language competencies and suitable for use online. This study aims to determine the online assessment methods and assessment media used by Arabic language teachers to evaluate their students’ literacy in Arabic learning. This research is survey research. This study involved 87 Arabic teachers from 45 Public Madrasah Aliyah (Islamic Public Senior High School) in South Kalimantan. Data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires and interviews. The data from close-ended questionnaires were analyzed and presented in descriptive methods. The data from open-ended was analyzed by reviewing each response, discovering themes in the verbatim statement, coding, and grouping the topics. The results of this study indicate that the assessment methods most often used by teachers are multiple-choice, true-false, short answer, and performance. The assessment method most students respond to is multiple-choice, true-false, and short answers. The assessment methods that students respond to the least are performance, products, interviews, and short answers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信